Not By Works

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
and therein lies your error.....Then kingdom of God is within us...Jesus said so in Luke 17.21....

Luke 17.21

[SUP]21 [/SUP]Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

Perhaps you could instruct your followers here?
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
Here's an artists rendition of the "not by works thread".


Hi Allen

I got to thinking about this yesterday and realized that the world doesn't debate us. Unless atheists come to the forum. Only believers who have different opinions.

So perhaps this is the correct thing to do? Am conflicted now.
 
Mar 7, 2016
4,678
24
0
Ive been doing research on what the workers against are declaring that no-one had faith until after the cross..

Ok heres a nugget for you...

[h=1]Matthew 13:58Amplified Bible, Classic Edition (AMPC)[/h] [SUP]58 [/SUP]And He did not do many works of power there, because of their unbelief (their lack of faith [SUP][a][/SUP]in the divine mission of Jesus).


ps i havent bracketed this out ....... this is how it is written
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
Back to my housework. Am surprised at how the thread dissolved again.

Then again, why not?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest

A sinner can't draw back.

"CLAIMS" don't do anything for a sinner. A sinner is a sinner.

What spirit would say "there's __ types of sinners in the Bible"?

The same spirit that twists scripture to verify false doctrine.

A demonic spirit.

Lol. The author said we are not of those, that WE (as apposed to them) believe UNTO THE SAVING of THE SOUL (something they have not done, )

He left not room that they could fall
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
As I already explained, the reference to "the blood of the covenant that sanctified him" in verse 29 seems to be referring to a Christian, but this overlooks the fact that the word translated "sanctified" (which is the verb form of the adjective "holy") which means "set apart," and doesn't necessarily refer to salvation.
You're overlooking all those meanings in Greek to justify yourself.

That is sinful.

*In 1 Corinthians 7:14, Paul uses it to specifically refer to non-Christians who are "sanctified" or "set apart" by their believing spouse. (And by this Paul does not mean that they are saved). A non-Christian can be "set apart" from other non-Christians without experiencing salvation as Paul clearly explained. So the word "sanctified" means to be "set apart."
That's the ONLY scripture that does this, PLUS, it's the only scripture saying the "sanctifier" is the spouse. Disqualified.
If the word "sanctified" simply meant saved, then you would have to say that the Sabbath was saved (Genesis 2:3), the tabernacle was saved (Exodus 29:43), the Lord was saved (Leviticus 10:3), the Father saved the Son (John 10:36) which does not line up with scripture.
I never said that.:)
In verse 39, the writer of Hebrews sets up the CONTRAST that makes it clear to me that he was referring to unbelievers, not saved people: But we are not of those who draw back to perdition, but of those who believe to the saving of the soul. Those who draw back to perdition do not believe to the saving of the soul and those who believe to the saving of the soul do not draw back to perdition.
The CONTRAST is faithful christians vs. drawing back, rebellious, willful sinning christians.
So after considering the context, it seems most likely that "he was sanctified" should be understood in the sense of someone who had been "set apart" or identified as an active participant in the Hebrew Christian community of believers, but who has committed apostasy by renouncing his identification with other believers, by rejecting the "knowledge of the truth" that he had received, and trampling under foot the work and the person of Christ himself. This gives evidence that his identification with the Hebrew Christian community was merely superficial (nominal Christian) and that he was not a genuine believer.
There's no such thing as a "superficial, nominal christian". You just made that up.

You would do well to quit using eisegesis & writing your personal meanings into scripture. It makes you a hoax.
 
Mar 7, 2016
4,678
24
0
nuggets dont disolve they shine forever more :)
Gold, as a metal, is generally considered to be “permanent” because it is resistant to degradation by air, water, or aerobic bacteria. Pure gold, however, is very soft. Therefore, the gold that we handle in daily life, in coins or jewelry, has mostly been alloyed, or combined, with other metals to make it stronger. Dissolving gold requires the application of aqua regia, a specific combination of nitric and hydrochloric acids.
 
S

sevenseas

Guest
Here's an artists rendition of the "not by works thread".



I don't like it

where's the white horse then?

looks more like the final episode of GOT

which we have not yet seen
 
S

sevenseas

Guest
who gets to define 'real' Christian?

is it the opposite of superficial, nominal Christian?

 
S

sevenseas

Guest




and would you believe they spelled you're, your?

memes these days. humph!
 
Mar 7, 2016
4,678
24
0
Gold, as a metal, is generally considered to be “permanent” because it is resistant to degradation by air, water, or aerobic bacteria. Pure gold, however, is very soft. Therefore, the gold that we handle in daily life, in coins or jewelry, has mostly been alloyed, or combined, with other metals to make it stronger. Dissolving gold requires the application of aqua regia, a specific combination of nitric and hydrochloric acids.
yup and 24 carrot gold can never tarnish :cool:..
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,460
13,399
113
58
You're overlooking all those meanings in Greek to justify yourself.

That is sinful.
Not at all. The same Greek word is used in 1 Corinthians 7:14 and the unbelieving husband who was "sanctified" was not saved and neither were these Hebrews that drew back to perdition and did not believe to the saving of the soul.

That's the ONLY scripture that does this, PLUS, it's the only scripture saying the "sanctifier" is the spouse. Disqualified.
Doesn't matter. I only need one example in scripture to prove my point. In 1 Corinthians 7:14, it says "the unbelieving husband is sanctified by his wife, just as these Hebrew "nominal" Christians were sanctified or "set apart" or identified as an active participant in the Hebrew Christian community of believers, but the writer of Hebrews NEVER specifically said they were "saved." It's not hard at all to find "nominal" Christians mixed in with a group of genuine Christians. Why do you think Paul says to examine ourselves to see whether we are in the faith? (2 Corinthians 13:5) Paul mentions false brethren in 2 Corinthians 11:26 and Galatians 2:4. We also have disciples who are not truly His disciples (John 8:31) because they get offended by the words of Jesus, turned back and walked with Him no more/no longer followed Him (John 6:66) and Jesus knew from the beginning who is was that did not truly believe (John 6:64).

I never said that.:)
The CONTRAST is faithful christians vs. drawing back, rebellious, willful sinning christians.
There's no such thing as a "superficial, nominal christian". You just made that up.
Willful sinning Christians is an oxymoron according to John. 1 John 3:9 - No one who is born of God practices sin.. That is willful and habitual sin (which is what the writer of Hebrews is addressing in Hebrews 10:26) willful rejection of Christ that is continuous action. But according to you, those who are born of God, practice sin and lose their salvation. Should I believe you or John? Check.

You would do well to quit using eisegesis & writing your personal meanings into scripture. It makes you a hoax.
I have simply harmonized scripture with scripture in order to reach the proper conclusion. You should do the same, instead of giving the word "sanctified" a broad brushed definition of saved, when that does not fit the context (Genesis 2:3; Exodus 29:43; Leviticus 10:3; 1 Corinthians 7:14; Hebrews 10:29-39). Check mate.
;)
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,833
29,206
113
truly glad you asked that question and thanks for the return hug :)

I just ate lunch and just want to answer yr question before I get back to work.

this experience was totally against my will, I did nothing to make it happen and I don't know what happened...I was not aware...only aware I was OBE as you say

I was saved and desiring to 'serve' God but quite young. through a family member, we became involved with a well known 'evangelist' (at the time and I won't name him...no purpose to it now and I'm really a pretty private person)

there were suspicions about this individual, but he had hundreds...literally hundreds...of invitations to conduct 'crusades' in Pentecostal churches across the US and some in Canada

I got to know him very well. he was thrown out of his denom and excommunicated. he was a practicing sexual deviant (no...he never touched me but he did slap me across the face one time when I innocently said he looked tired)

there were plenty of strange goings on. my experience was one and many other people suffered things while being involved

years later, when I was counselling with someone and praying with them, another woman and it was just the 2 of us...she had asked for help but I will never go alone again..not even same sex..as I was reading from the Bible and asking her to participate (she was a believer) I felt strange all of a sudden. we were across the living room from each other and I don't remember what she was saying...but I remember the look on her face.

I started to feel as I had when I had the OBE. I immediately shut it all down. She was involved in sexual fantasies and imagined someone in love with her. I was trying to bring her out of that deception. The man whom she fancied in love with her, thought she had mental problems.

it is my experience that those that have sexual demons attached to them have influence over others and some know they have this influence and enjoy it and others are oblivious and as much a victim of the demon as the ones bothered by it. not everyone will be 'bothered'. the Bible is clear that we should run from sexual sins. that is my best advice also

this is not an isolated thing. people are embarrassed to talk about this kind of thing but it is actually common.

I am not saying people are demon possessed. I do not see in scripture where believers are possessed by the devil. Influenced, bothered, even directed by...whatever, but we do know our enemies are spiritual and far more cunning then many will concede.

I don't make it my business to look into things like that, but if you do know something, sometimes someone will ask for help or need counselling.

now that's a long answer and maybe more than you would want to hear, but that's what happened

this same woman that I tried to help was involved in extra-biblical beliefs and loved how so called special knowledge made her feel superior and important. it also turned out that she had had several so called 'spiritual' involvements with men, thinking they were attracted to her or in love with her
You are welcome, and thank you for answering. I found that paranormal experiences increased when I was with certain people, but I was not saved at the time, as far as I know. I am uncertain as to the exact date of my being saved, for I had multiple supernatural encounters with God before surrendering/submitting to Him :)
 
Aug 15, 2009
9,745
179
0
Not at all. The same Greek word is used in 1 Corinthians 7:14 and the unbelieving husband who was "sanctified" was not saved and neither were these Hebrews that drew back to perdition and did not believe to the saving of the soul.

Doesn't matter. I only need one example in scripture to prove my point. In 1 Corinthians 7:14, it says "the unbelieving husband is sanctified by his wife, just as these Hebrew "nominal" Christians were sanctified or "set apart" or identified as an active participant in the Hebrew Christian community of believers, but the writer of Hebrews NEVER specifically said they were "saved." It's not hard at all to find "nominal" Christians mixed in with a group of genuine Christians. Why do you think Paul says to examine ourselves to see whether we are in the faith? (2 Corinthians 13:5) Paul mentions false brethren in 2 Corinthians 11:26 and Galatians 2:4. We also have disciples who are not truly His disciples (John 8:31) because they get offended by the words of Jesus, turned back and walked with Him no more/no longer followed Him (John 6:66) and Jesus knew from the beginning who is was that did not truly believe (John 6:64).

Willful sinning Christians is an oxymoron according to John. 1 John 3:9 - No one who is born of God practices sin.. That is willful and habitual sin (which is what the writer of Hebrews is addressing in Hebrews 10:26) willful rejection of Christ that is continuous action. But according to you, those who are born of God, practice sin and lose their salvation. Should I believe you or John? Check.

I have simply harmonized scripture with scripture in order to reach the proper conclusion. You should do the same, instead of giving the word "sanctified" a broad brushed definition of saved, when that does not fit the context (Genesis 2:3; Exodus 29:43; Leviticus 10:3; 1 Corinthians 7:14; Hebrews 10:29-39). Check mate.
;)
When the Bible shows you're wrong, you're wrong. All the writing with your eisegesis won't change a thing.
 

BillG

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2017
9,020
4,439
113
Gold, as a metal, is generally considered to be “permanent” because it is resistant to degradation by air, water, or aerobic bacteria. Pure gold, however, is very soft. Therefore, the gold that we handle in daily life, in coins or jewelry, has mostly been alloyed, or combined, with other metals to make it stronger. Dissolving gold requires the application of aqua regia, a specific combination of nitric and hydrochloric acids.
What I find amazing Jimbo is this.

I can't recall the verses to hand but I'm sure there is something in the bible that talks about the refining fire of God in our lives.
Its a process that continues to happen so that all the crap is removed and the nuggets you talk about start to shine through.

Its a process. As a God refines us more and more the dross that in our lives starts to fall away.

People think that diamonds come from compressed coal but my understanding is that they don't.
A diamond in order to become one has to go through a process to become one.

I would say, you me and others are diamonds. All the elements are there and it's God who refines us and takes us through the process.

Refiners fire, my hearts one desire, is to be Holy and set apart for you Lord.

Jimbo my friend you are a nugget and a diamond.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,460
13,399
113
58
When the Bible shows you're wrong, you're wrong. All the writing with your eisegesis won't change a thing.
The Bible has not shown me to be wrong through harmonizing scripture with scripture and the Bible has not shown me a specific verse that says a really "saved" person really "lost their salvation," so that settles it for me. :)

I clearly made my point in post #24413, but you can believe whatever tickles your ears.
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
I have wondered about a verse for a long time so I may as well ask the opinions of all of you since I am finding you all to be a great help while we walk well in here. :)

It is the verses that say: Woe...it will be more tolerable or better for these or those unbelievers than it will be for you on the day of judgement. (My paraphrase).

The verse astounds me.
I have thought of it together with: If you didn't say you could see, you would have no sin, but since you say you can see...

I can't quite glean it though.
Hi SG

I'm just getting here and you might have received an answer by now.

You're referring to Mathew 10:15

Jesus was instructing His 12 Apostles as to how they should go out and preach. He was telling them how they were to behave when accepted and when not accepted.

In Mathew 10:14 Jesus tells the Apostles that whoever does not receive them and heed their words, they are to shake the dust off their feet. IOW, they were to leave and not to worry about it further.


In Mathew 10:15 Jesus tells the Apostles that Sodom and Gomorrah will be judged less harshly on Judgement day than the cities that do not accept and heed the words of the Apostles.

In Genesis 19, God destroyed S and G because they were cities full of sin.

So why would the cities the Apostles visited by judged MORE harshly?
Because they had the Apostles that were speaking to them.
They heard the witnesses of Jesus.
They heard the actual teachings and the good news of Jesus.

It was as if they were denying not the Apostles, but Jesus Himself.

The unpardonable sin.
The great sin.
Unbelief.
 
Mar 7, 2016
4,678
24
0
Not at all. The same Greek word is used in 1 Corinthians 7:14 and the unbelieving husband who was "sanctified" was not saved and neither were these Hebrews that drew back to perdition and did not believe to the saving of the soul.

Doesn't matter. I only need one example in scripture to prove my point. In 1 Corinthians 7:14, it says "the unbelieving husband is sanctified by his wife, just as these Hebrew "nominal" Christians were sanctified or "set apart" or identified as an active participant in the Hebrew Christian community of believers, but the writer of Hebrews NEVER specifically said they were "saved." It's not hard at all to find "nominal" Christians mixed in with a group of genuine Christians. Why do you think Paul says to examine ourselves to see whether we are in the faith? (2 Corinthians 13:5) Paul mentions false brethren in 2 Corinthians 11:26 and Galatians 2:4. We also have disciples who are not truly His disciples (John 8:31) because they get offended by the words of Jesus, turned back and walked with Him no more/no longer followed Him (John 6:66) and Jesus knew from the beginning who is was that did not truly believe (John 6:64).

Willful sinning Christians is an oxymoron according to John. 1 John 3:9 - No one who is born of God practices sin.. That is willful and habitual sin (which is what the writer of Hebrews is addressing in Hebrews 10:26) willful rejection of Christ that is continuous action. But according to you, those who are born of God, practice sin and lose their salvation. Should I believe you or John? Check.

I have simply harmonized scripture with scripture in order to reach the proper conclusion. You should do the same, instead of giving the word "sanctified" a broad brushed definition of saved, when that does not fit the context (Genesis 2:3; Exodus 29:43; Leviticus 10:3; 1 Corinthians 7:14; Hebrews 10:29-39). Check mate.
;)
wrongggggggggggg you forgot about the scripture that says if there is one believer in a house the whole house is sanctified
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
Are we in the kingdom of God or is it yet to come?

The subject is not me but the kingdom of God. All sin is banished from the presence of God. In the kingdom of God there is no sin therefore there is no need of the law. The law shows transgression and there will be no transgression in the kingdom of God.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
Do you not know that the Kingdom starts here?
The Kingdom is NOW.
John 3:3