A Study of Torah from Gen. - Rev.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

NayborBear

Banned Serpent Seed Heresy
why does it matter if we call God HaShem?

for me, it would be breaking with the inspired tradition of the apostles

and replacing it with a Jewish tradition.

for me, that would be a dangerous path to start on.

I'm not going to pin point every instance in the N.T. where the Apostle Paul, among others, OFT TIMES, (if not every time) started their writings like: "Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, CALLED to be an apostle, SET APART UNTO the "Gospel OF God" (HaShem, in the Hebrew), (Which He (HaShem) had PROMISED afore by His (HaShem's) prophets in the Holy Scriptures).

CONCERNING His (HaSham's) Son
Jesus Christ our Lord, Who was BORN OF the seed of David, according to human nature, and DECLARED to be the "Son OF God (HaShem) WITH power according to the "Spirit of Holiness", by the (His Jesus's being) Resurrected from the dead:......Romans 1: 1-4 (KJV)

Do you see the discernment regarding the differenceBETWEEN God (HaShem), and His Son here? Or, is this merely falling on a deaf ear? Or are you simply interested in what Paul, and others say CONCERNING "doctrine/s according to human nature", and not from whence it comes? Thinking it is good in your eyes, that trusting in Paul's and the other's doctrinal expressions, are going to save yer gentile arse?

Yet, I suppose you are correct (but probably not in the way you were thinking), in that it is INDEED a very dangerous path to travel! Dangerous for the kingdom of darkness, and the spirit of antichrist, which are, and have been amongst us, for such a very long time!
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,534
87
48
Gen 14:1 And it came to pass in the days of Amraphel king of Shinar, Arioch king of Ellasar, Chedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal king of nations;
Gen 14:2 That these made war with Bera king of Sodom, and with Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, and Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela, which is Zoar.
Gen 14:3 All these were joined together in the vale of Siddim, which is the salt sea.



Gen 14:2 That these made war with Bera king of Sodom, and with Birsha king of Gomorrah, Shinab king of Admah, and Shemeber king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela, which is Zoar.
Gen 14:3 All these were joined together in the vale of Siddim, which is the salt sea.
Gen 14:4 Twelve years they served Chedorlaomer, and in the thirteenth year they rebelled.

Some say that Amraphel is Nimrod. That he was mad that Abram wouldn't follow idol warship. Chedorlaomer AKA Elam son of Shem, was the leader of this alliance,
For 12 years Chedorlaomer and his allies dominated the regain and a wide array of lesser kings paid them tribute, or taxes.
Some think the rebellion lasted 13 years. Only in the 13th year, did the alliance asserted their authority, and crushed the the revolt.
others say it was not until the 13th year that the rebellion started. They point to the gathering of the 9 kings as a sort of peace conference. Where knowing they were out numbered, and lest able to fight, the 4 kings, gave in and paid the tribute demanded by Nimrod.

Gen 14:5 And in the fourteenth year came Chedorlaomer, and the kings that were with him, and smote the Rephaims in Ashteroth Karnaim, and the Zuzims in Ham, and the Emims in Shaveh Kiriathaim,
Gen 14:6 And the Horites in their mount Seir, unto Elparan, which is by the wilderness.
Gen 14:7 And they returned, and came to Enmishpat, which is Kadesh, and smote all the country of the Amalekites, and also the Amorites, that dwelt in Hazezontamar.

As this would seen to back the idea that for a time, everyone paid their tribute, for at lest 13 years, Most do follow that this was following a peace treaty, and when it was broken war soon followed. They returned, points to the idea that when they opened this war to crush the rebellion, they went to the furthers point first. This does help one to understand the meted of war they had in mind. To start further from home, would mean they couldn't pull back and join with their friends. True they could still do this, only if we are looking at the stronger nation being the furthest away, they would not be building in strength. Numbers maybe, that doesn't mean they are stronger.

Gen 14:8 And there went out the king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, and the king of Admah, and the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (the same is Zoar;) and they joined battle with them in the vale of Siddim;
Gen 14:9 With Chedorlaomer the king of Elam, and with Tidal king of nations, and Amraphel king of Shinar, and Arioch king of Ellasar; four kings with five.
Gen 14:10 And the vale of Siddim was full of slimepits; and the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled, and fell there; and they that remained fled to the mountain.
Gen 14:11 And they took all the goods of Sodom and Gomorrah, and all their victuals, and went their way.
Gen 14:12 And they took Lot, Abram's brother's son, who dwelt in Sodom, and his goods, and departed.

When picking your feild of batle, the terain is always tacken into account. It can be used for or againest you. Here it would seem they intended to use the pits, to their advantage. Yet when they lost ground, or the will to fight, they ran. This lead to the pits being used againest them, and not in their faver. So the stronger of the alliances won the war, and took what they wanted. However, takeing Lot, turned into a bad move on their part. Yet why would they think that a small people like Abram had at hand would have any chance at defeating them?

I can't speak for any of you, yet had it been me leading an alliance of 5 kings, with an untold number of fighting men. Then I look up and find that 318 men were after me, I would have had a good lauigh. Even if it was my last.

Gen 14:13 And there came one that had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew; for he dwelt in the plain of Mamre the Amorite, brother of Eshcol, and brother of Aner: and these were confederate with Abram.
Gen 14:14 And when Abram heard that his brother was taken captive, he armed his trained servants, born in his own house, three hundred and eighteen, and pursued them unto Dan.

He armed his trained survents. One may note that even in the Hebrew, we are not told what they are trained in. Some think it was HaShems Law, and this is why Isreal spent 400 yers of servitude in Egypt. Others say they were trained in war, as haveing trained fighting nem was not just a want, it was a need. If one wished to stay safe, and keep their family safe, they had to know how to fight, and other nations had to understand you are good at it. Think about it, in a dog eat dog world, onlythe meanest dog eats.

Gen 14:15 And he divided himself against them, he and his servants, by night, and smote them, and pursued them unto Hobah, which is on the left hand of Damascus.

Though this tells us little of what happened, we can get the idea that it was resounding win for Abram. He freed Lot as was his intent. Why Lot was not killed out right, we may never know. Yet we can say for sure that HaShem didn't want that, He had a use for Lot. And so useing Lot, HaShem had something to teach us.

Gen 14:17 And the king of Sodom went out to meet him after his return from the slaughter of Chedorlaomer, and of the kings that were with him, at the valley of Shaveh, which is the king's dale.
Gen 14:18 And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God.

Though little is ever said about Melchizedek, we are told he was king of Selam. This today is known as Jeruasmel. Some say he was Yeshua, a tail I will not debate. Yet others think this may have been Shem, the most honored of Noah's sons. As we know, Shem was given the highest blessing, and from that one can assume that he followed after HaShem in all his ways. Thus when we see that Melchisedek was a priest of the most high, this story comes to mind. Also one can look at the world as it was then, and see that to follow HaShem was not a common thing to do.

Gen 14:19 And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth:
Gen 14:20 And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all.

And he gave him tithes. Though we are not told who gave the tithes, the most common teaching is that Abram, gave tithes to Melchizedek. In so doing, Abram gave us a hint as to the Law he lived by. As we will see, HaShem did give the order that a tithe was to be given to the Levits. In this case, the priest was not a Levit, as they had yet come to be, still it was given to a priest.

Gen 14:21 And the king of Sodom said unto Abram, Give me the persons, and take the goods to thyself.
Gen 14:22 And Abram said to the king of Sodom, I have lift up mine hand unto the LORD, the most high God, the possessor of heaven and earth,
Gen 14:23 That I will not take from a thread even to a shoelatchet, and that I will not take any thing that is thine, lest thou shouldest say, I have made Abram rich:
Gen 14:24 Save only that which the young men have eaten, and the portion of the men which went with me, Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre; let them take their portion.

The king of Sodom, would may have meant well his offer. Yet Abram, understanding men, seen that it may someday be used to place guilt on him, refused to take any part, no matter how small it was. This is made clealr in Abram's reply. He lifted up his hand to HaShem. This makes it clear to anyone around that Abram is for real. When he tells the king, lest you say you made me ritch. He letting it be known that the king now has no hold over Abram, and will not have one at time in life. This also frees His blood line of an obligation, weath real or implied.
Abram does how ever say that the men that went with him, (thoughs not of his own house anyway) should get what they have earned.
 

NayborBear

Banned Serpent Seed Heresy
I suppose that a man may believe that Melchizedek, aka/Shem was a son of Noah. I'd rather believe that Ha Shem, at that time, and who knows, probably still does, place parts of Himself, like the 3 who dined with Abram, right before, they went into soddom n gommorah, to warn Lot. Also, like the wrestling match Jacob had with "some" angel. Seems "scary" to people these days to even consider a mind set, such as this, yet, there it is....in black and white for all to read!
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
Genealogy isn't my thing. Though it can help with knowing a bit more about the peoples, There is however one of interest.
We are told of three sons of Noah.

The names of the sons means---Shem means glory, Japheth means fruitfulness, and Ham means hot.

Canaan is Ham's son. Ham was cursed, Seth was blessed although the blessing was split between Seth and Japhetht Seth received the authority and Japheth received the wealth, but this is as long as the people of Japheth is "in his tent". This saying for the men of those times means something like we say peas in a pod, or birds of a feather.

Shem's children will follow God, Ham's will go in another direction.

Shem's descendants became the Hebrews, the Arabs and most of the Orientals.

Scripture says :May God enlarge Japheth and let him dwell in the tents of Shem.

Ham's people went to Africa, Egypt, and people of the Philistines.

Japheth's went to Spain, Germany, the Celts, Wales, Britain, and Russia.
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
I suppose that a man may believe that Melchizedek, aka/Shem was a son of Noah. I'd rather believe that Ha Shem, at that time, and who knows:2, probably still does, place parts of Himself, like the 3 who dined with Abram, right before, they went into soddom n gommorah, to warn Lot. Also, like the wrestling match Jacob had with "some" angel. Seems "scary" to people these days to even consider a mind set, such as this, yet, there it is....in black and white for all to read!
In Hebrews 13:2 it says: Do not forget to show hospitality to strangers, for by doing so some people have shown hospitality to angels without knowing it.

There are different kinds of angels with different duties, one can take on human form. An angel isn't scary.

Melchizedek was a king and a High priest, as Jesus was.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
Wheren't the Apostles Jewish? Being as they lived as Jewish people, and used Hebrew as their first language, how can we say they didn't follow Jewish tradition, to a large %. After all, it was their life, what they did before Yeshua, and for many I am sure it was their life after as well.

Like you I see no reason to try to force others to follow a habit that comes from Years of study under the Rabbi's I have spent time under. After as I said, HaShem created all languages on earth, He also knows ones heart. So He does know what we say, no matter what words are used.
MARK 7:6 He answered them, “Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written, ‘This people honors me with their lips,

but their heart is far from me.


if you follow Jewish traditions, you are following a people whose hearts are far from God.




no one knows what the apostles spoke regarding God's name


but when they wrote, the spirit never inspired them to use it, or HaShem.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
I have seen many times where people try to say the people in Israel now are not from the family of Abraham. They use many things to show this, yet as DNA is used to find out if a person is or isn't, that has dropped off a lot.
Israel is what it is. They are His people, no matter what they do with government.
I don't question they are Abraham's, and Jacob's, children,


just whether the current nation of Israel is the same as the Biblical nation of Israel.




I'm sure you've heard that some Jewish people don't think Biblical Israel can be re-established until the Messiah comes.

trying to do so by human means will just lead to strife, as it is today.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113

I'm not going to pin point every instance in the N.T. where the Apostle Paul, among others, OFT TIMES, (if not every time) started their writings like: "Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, CALLED to be an apostle, SET APART UNTO the "Gospel OF God" (HaShem, in the Hebrew), (Which He (HaShem) had PROMISED afore by His (HaShem's) prophets in the Holy Scriptures).

CONCERNING His (HaSham's) Son
Jesus Christ our Lord, Who was BORN OF the seed of David, according to human nature, and DECLARED to be the "Son OF God (HaShem) WITH power according to the "Spirit of Holiness", by the (His Jesus's being) Resurrected from the dead:......Romans 1: 1-4 (KJV)

Do you see the discernment regarding the differenceBETWEEN God (HaShem), and His Son here? Or, is this merely falling on a deaf ear? Or are you simply interested in what Paul, and others say CONCERNING "doctrine/s according to human nature", and not from whence it comes? Thinking it is good in your eyes, that trusting in Paul's and the other's doctrinal expressions, are going to save yer gentile arse?

Yet, I suppose you are correct (but probably not in the way you were thinking), in that it is INDEED a very dangerous path to travel! Dangerous for the kingdom of darkness, and the spirit of antichrist, which are, and have been amongst us, for such a very long time!
Paul wrote Romans in Greek, and the spirit inspired him to write

theos

not 'ho onoma', which would be greek for 'the name'.
 
Feb 28, 2016
11,311
2,973
113
how are you meaning this Dan? is this a 'trick' question???

'just whether the current nation of Israel is the same as the Biblical nation of Israel.'

=====================================================

blood is blood, if you know your Bible, you will learn that God has always had a way
to KEEP His chosen 'PURE', then or now... believe what you will...He NEVER changes...
 
Last edited:

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,534
87
48
I suppose that a man may believe that Melchizedek, aka/Shem was a son of Noah. I'd rather believe that Ha Shem, at that time, and who knows, probably still does, place parts of Himself, like the 3 who dined with Abram, right before, they went into soddom n gommorah, to warn Lot. Also, like the wrestling match Jacob had with "some" angel. Seems "scary" to people these days to even consider a mind set, such as this, yet, there it is....in black and white for all to read!
When one sees Melchizedek as Yeshua, do they not see Him has HaShem? I would think so, being as Yeshua is in fact HaShem manifest in human form.
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,534
87
48
MARK 7:6 He answered them, “Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written, ‘This people honors me with their lips,

but their heart is far from me.


if you follow Jewish traditions, you are following a people whose hearts are far from God.




no one knows what the apostles spoke regarding God's name


but when they wrote, the spirit never inspired them to use it, or HaShem.
Please don't take this the wrong way. I am asking so that we may find something out.
Are you going from what you read in your Bible, or have you taken the time to look through the Hebrew and Greek it came from? The reason I ask is, that unless we know for sure what the original text says, can we do more than assume?
Take the word Easter. It only shows once and only in one translation. A person can take that one showing of the word, and build a case for the keeping of pagan holidays. Yet if one was to look at the history of that word, and what word was used in the oldest available text, they would soon find that it was not Easter, rather Passover.
Am I making any kind sense at all?
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,534
87
48
I don't question they are Abraham's, and Jacob's, children,


just whether the current nation of Israel is the same as the Biblical nation of Israel.




I'm sure you've heard that some Jewish people don't think Biblical Israel can be re-established until the Messiah comes.

trying to do so by human means will just lead to strife, as it is today.
I got you now. Sorry I was misunderstanding what you were saying, my bad.
The Israel of the Bile is notr the one we see today. As with any people, they have been heavily influenced by the nations they were in for close to 2000 years. That is why, as you pointed out, many don't think we will see the Israel HaShem intended from the onset. Although in truth, this question has also been placed before us many times over. Was Israel ever what HaShem wanted them to be?

Any one that has read the OT, knows that Israel was always turning away from HaShem. True they walked with Him for a time, then fell into idolatry, and back and forth. They were to be a light unto the world, teaching the ways of HaShem, and living by the same teachings. As they never really seemed to do so for long, one may say that yes the Israel of today is the same as that of OT times. A discussion I myself would set away from for many reason.
 
Apr 15, 2017
2,867
653
113
I got you now. Sorry I was misunderstanding what you were saying, my bad.
The Israel of the Bile is notr the one we see today. As with any people, they have been heavily influenced by the nations they were in for close to 2000 years. That is why, as you pointed out, many don't think we will see the Israel HaShem intended from the onset. Although in truth, this question has also been placed before us many times over. Was Israel ever what HaShem wanted them to be?

Any one that has read the OT, knows that Israel was always turning away from HaShem. True they walked with Him for a time, then fell into idolatry, and back and forth. They were to be a light unto the world, teaching the ways of HaShem, and living by the same teachings. As they never really seemed to do so for long, one may say that yes the Israel of today is the same as that of OT times. A discussion I myself would set away from for many reason.
But that will all change soon,and Israel will be back right with God.

Rom 11:25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
Rom 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
Rom 11:27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
Rom 11:28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
Rom 11:29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.

Eze 39:21 And I will set my glory among the heathen, and all the heathen shall see my judgment that I have executed, and my hand that I have laid upon them.
Eze 39:22 So the house of Israel shall know that I am the LORD their God from that day and forward.
Eze 39:23 And the heathen shall know that the house of Israel went into captivity for their iniquity: because they trespassed against me, therefore hid I my face from them, and gave them into the hand of their enemies: so fell they all by the sword.
Eze 39:24 According to their uncleanness and according to their transgressions have I done unto them, and hid my face from them.
Eze 39:25 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Now will I bring again the captivity of Jacob, and have mercy upon the whole house of Israel, and will be jealous for my holy name;
Eze 39:26 After that they have borne their shame, and all their trespasses whereby they have trespassed against me, when they dwelt safely in their land, and none made them afraid.
Eze 39:27 When I have brought them again from the people, and gathered them out of their enemies' lands, and am sanctified in them in the sight of many nations;
Eze 39:28 Then shall they know that I am the LORD their God, which caused them to be led into captivity among the heathen: but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there.
Eze 39:29 Neither will I hide my face any more from them: for I have poured out my spirit upon the house of Israel, saith the Lord GOD.

Israel is blinded in part,they accept the Old Testament,but not the New,for the majority,but Israel as a nation must come to the truth that Jesus is their Messiah,until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in,when salvation is no longer available to the Gentiles,and so all Israel shall be saved,and physical Israel will become spiritual,and acknowledge the truth.

The man of sin will establish peace in the Middle East,which will pave the way for all Jews to go back to Israel,which God said He will leave none of the Jews in the nations,and the Gentiles will come together,and say,Peace and safety,and will try to establish peace on earth,and the Jews and Gentiles will be separated.

The Jews will split Jerusalem with the Palestinians,and the Jews will rebuild their temple with no hassle from the Palestinians,and since they are blinded in part will go back to animal sacrifices.

The man of sin will step in to their temple and claim to be God and their Messiah,and addresses the world that He is God by harnessing the power of nature,and obtaining power,and has the solution to achieve peace on earth,and when the world takes the mark of the beast then repentance,and salvation,is no longer available to the Gentiles,and the fulness of the Gentiles will be come in.

God will send the Jews 2 witnesses and turn them to the truth that Jesus is their Messiah,and the man of sin,and the world,will attack Israel,and Jesus comes with His saints,and defeats the world,and saves Israel,and so all Israel shall be saved,and physical Israel shall be spiritual,and right with God.

Jer 46:27 But fear not thou, O my servant Jacob, and be not dismayed, O Israel: for, behold, I will save thee from afar off, and thy seed from the land of their captivity; and Jacob shall return, and be in rest and at ease, and none shall make him afraid.
Jer 46:28 Fear thou not, O Jacob my servant, saith the LORD: for I am with thee; for I will make a full end of all the nations whither I have driven thee: but I will not make a full end of thee, but correct thee in measure; yet will I not leave thee wholly unpunished.

Jer 31:35 Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name:
Jer 31:36 If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever.
Jer 31:37 Thus saith the LORD; If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel for all that they have done, saith the LORD.

Jer 33:23 Moreover the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah, saying,
Jer 33:24 Considerest thou not what this people have spoken, saying, The two families which the LORD hath chosen, he hath even cast them off? thus they have despised my people, that they should be no more a nation before them.
Jer 33:25 Thus saith the LORD; If my covenant be not with day and night, and if I have not appointed the ordinances of heaven and earth;
Jer 33:26 Then will I cast away the seed of Jacob, and David my servant, so that I will not take any of his seed to be rulers over the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: for I will cause their captivity to return, and have mercy on them.
 

Gabriel2020

Senior Member
May 6, 2017
1,099
41
48
God has many names given by man concerning incidents and encounters. things he did, and promised., but he has only one name that he calls himself. ISRAEL!! His chosen are called by his name. That is why he labeled Jacob with it. To identify his people, he put his name on them.
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,534
87
48
God has many names given by man concerning incidents and encounters. things he did, and promised., but he has only one name that he calls himself. ISRAEL!! His chosen are called by his name. That is why he labeled Jacob with it. To identify his people, he put his name on them.
Yet in Torah, He calls Him Self I am. Or YHVH
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
how are you meaning this Dan? is this a 'trick' question???

'just whether the current nation of Israel is the same as the Biblical nation of Israel.'

=====================================================

blood is blood, if you know your Bible, you will learn that God has always had a way
to KEEP His chosen 'PURE', then or now... believe what you will...He NEVER changes...
Biblical Israel must always have a son of David on the throne.

does the current nation of Israel have a throne?

or a prime minister, Knesset, etc?

I'm not sure.
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
Please don't take this the wrong way. I am asking so that we may find something out.
Are you going from what you read in your Bible, or have you taken the time to look through the Hebrew and Greek it came from? The reason I ask is, that unless we know for sure what the original text says, can we do more than assume?
Take the word Easter. It only shows once and only in one translation. A person can take that one showing of the word, and build a case for the keeping of pagan holidays. Yet if one was to look at the history of that word, and what word was used in the oldest available text, they would soon find that it was not Easter, rather Passover.
Am I making any kind sense at all?
definitely the original languages.

did you want more details about the nt Greek?
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
I got you now. Sorry I was misunderstanding what you were saying, my bad.
The Israel of the Bile is notr the one we see today. As with any people, they have been heavily influenced by the nations they were in for close to 2000 years. That is why, as you pointed out, many don't think we will see the Israel HaShem intended from the onset. Although in truth, this question has also been placed before us many times over. Was Israel ever what HaShem wanted them to be?

Any one that has read the OT, knows that Israel was always turning away from HaShem. True they walked with Him for a time, then fell into idolatry, and back and forth. They were to be a light unto the world, teaching the ways of HaShem, and living by the same teachings. As they never really seemed to do so for long, one may say that yes the Israel of today is the same as that of OT times. A discussion I myself would set away from for many reason.
a similar idea

can the UN simply declare the state of Israel?

then Poof there is the state of Israel?




can any group of Jewish people decide to make a state of Israel, and it is?
 

Blik

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2016
7,312
2,428
113
Please don't take this the wrong way. I am asking so that we may find something out.
Are you going from what you read in your Bible, or have you taken the time to look through the Hebrew and Greek it came from? The reason I ask is, that unless we know for sure what the original text says, can we do more than assume?
Take the word Easter. It only shows once and only in one translation. A person can take that one showing of the word, and build a case for the keeping of pagan holidays. Yet if one was to look at the history of that word, and what word was used in the oldest available text, they would soon find that it was not Easter, rather Passover.
Am I making any kind sense at all?
All scripture is a translation from the language of God into the language of man except when scripture states "the Lord says".

The language of earth that the Lord uses iHebrew. If it is written in Greek, it is still almost always written by men who are Hebrew in culture and training. Alexander the Great introduced a different way of thinking, but the Hebrews kept to their culture.

I am studying the book of Romans as written by Paul as a rabbi, and a Jew. We often think of Paul as becoming gentile instead of a Jewish rabbi who met Christ and was chosen to teach the gentiles.

r
 

NayborBear

Banned Serpent Seed Heresy
When one sees Melchizedek as Yeshua, do they not see Him has HaShem? I would think so, being as Yeshua is in fact HaShem manifest in human form.
No?....Melchizadek, it is written is a priest of
the Most High God. One may well could think of Yeshua as Melchizadek. But not as HaShem! Son of Hashem? Yes! HaShem?...No!