The law of Christ is the sermon on the mount plus particular emphasis as on love, lovingWhat are the commandments in the New Covenant?
your enemies, loving each other.
The law of Christ is the sermon on the mount plus particular emphasis as on love, lovingWhat are the commandments in the New Covenant?
this is correct. but, if you do not keep these standards every hour of every day, then you fall short. this makes you a sinner. you need grace and forgiveness.The law of Christ is the sermon on the mount plus particular emphasis as on love, loving
your enemies, loving each other.
First, you didn't prove anything.
Yes, that is the issue, whether you want to acknowledge it or not. When a person is born again, he/she becomes a child of God by birth. 1 Peter 1:23 says we are born again of incorruptible seed. That incorruptible seed is eternal life. Eternal is eternal.
Well, then, let's look at the actions of the father …
Luke 15:20 And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him.
The father saw his son, when he was yet a great way off. Please note the father was not sitting in sackcloth and ashes mourning the death of his son. The father was waiting for his son to return.
The sermon on the mount are descriptions of how the kingdom of God works and operates when the life of Christ is manifesting His fruit in our lives.
Trying to mimic good moral living is the hallmark of all the religions of the world and there is a religion called Christianity that attempts to do the same thing. They think that if they mimic the descriptions of the kingdom of God - that makes them righteous. It's a deception. Only Christ makes us righteous.
The message of the righteousness of God in Christ in the gospel is a stumbling block to all that think trying to mimic good morals creates righteousness and thus makes them acceptable to God.
Romans 10:2-4 (NASB)
[SUP]2 [/SUP] For I testify about them that they have a zeal for God, but not in accordance with knowledge.
[SUP]3[/SUP] For not knowing about God's righteousness and seeking to establish their own, they did not subject themselves to the righteousness of God.
[SUP]4 [/SUP] For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.
The law represents man's attempts of being righteous by what they do or don't do. All works-based/works-righteousness belief systems are based on this principle.
The Judas who was present was not IscariotSagart said:John 14:15. “If you love Me, you will keep My commandments.
16. “I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever;
17. that is the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see Him or know Him, but you know Him because He abides with you and will be in you. (NASB, 1995)
To whom was Jesus speaking? He was speaking to His twelve disciples—one of whom was Judas (v. 22).
John 13:30-31 tell us that Judas had left: He then having received the sop went immediately out: and it was night. Therefore, when he was gone out, Jesus said, Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him.Sagart said:Was Jesus telling the truth to all twelve of his disciples, or was He pretending that Judas was not there?
What the father didn't do was put on sackcloth and ashes and mourn as a father would if his son had died. The father watched for his son to return. If he thought his son was truly dead, he would not have watched for his son to return. Luke 15:20 But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him. When the son was a great way off ...Stephen63 said:What you did show, however, is that the Father DIDN'T GO AFTER THE SON & MAKE HIM COME HOME. The father didn't MAKE him nor FORCE him to do anything.
What the father DID DO was watch & wait, hoping he'd come back. That is the context of the parable.
You just took Romans 10 outta context to say Paul was speaking about the whole worldly religious system, when he was only speaking of the JEWS.
but Israel, pursuing a law of righteousness, did not arrive at that law. 32Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as though it were by works. They stumbled over the stumbling stone,33just as it is written,
“BEHOLD, I LAY IN ZION A STONE OF STUMBLING AND A ROCK OF OFFENSE,
AND HE WHO BELIEVES IN HIM WILL NOT BE DISAPPOINTED.”
You lie every time you use a scripture against a so-called "works-salvation".
E V E R Y time Paul speaks against works, it's against THE WORKS OF THE
LAW.
My turn.....
What the father didn't do was put on sackcloth and ashes and mourn as a father would if his son had died. The father watched for his son to return. If he thought his son was truly dead, he would not have watched for his son to return. Luke 15:20 But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him. When the son was a great way off ...
Paul was talking ABOUT the Jews to the Romans, and comparing their attitude with what it should have been.
Sure he would. Especially given the mode of travel back in those days.My turn.....
If the father knew his son was coming back, he wouldn't have been standing out there every day looking for him at all!
Your turn.![]()
Originally Posted by Stephen63 What you did show, however, is that the Father DIDN'T GO AFTER THE SON & MAKE HIM COME HOME. The father didn't MAKE him nor FORCE him to do anything.
What the father DID DO was watch & wait, hoping he'd come back. That is the context of the parable
You have to take the three parable together. In the first the shepherd sought the lost sheep until He found it and put it on His shoulder and brought it home. He didn't leave it much choice there. The woman sought the coin until she found it. The thought was of persistence in seeking. The parable of the prodigal son was the other side of the story.
You indicate "some are told to depart because they are worker of iniquity". Please provide the Scripture reference for your statement.
And in Romans 1, where does God state that those who are turned over to a reprobate mind were at any time born again children of God?
The Lord loses "none" that belong to Him.
I asked because you could be referencing Matthew 7 or Luke 13.Rockrz said:Go to your favorite search engine and search for it... if you read Jesus much, you'd already know about this.reneweddaybyday said:You indicate "some are told to depart because they are worker of iniquity". Please provide the Scripture reference for your statement.
In Romans 1:21, the word "knew" is the Greek word gnontes which means to perceive, be acquainted with. They have a natural knowledge of God as God is revealed in creation.Rockrz said:In Romans 1:21 it says they they knew God and became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
...
and in Romans 1:28 He said they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind...