Interestingly, you do not get the same "effects" at both 'poles'. If the Earth were as modern 'science' suggests -- within the 1 year cycle of the orbit of the Earth around the sun - every place on Earth would receive the same light and heat from the sun as the corresponding place on the other side of the globe, at the same distance from the equator. For example, 75 degrees north of the equator would be like 75 degrees south of the equator. However, that is not the reality. While plenty of plant and animal life flourishes in the far northern regions, such hardly exists at all in the comparable south regions - both being the same distance from the equator - at 75 degrees, both north and south, for example.
The north 'pole' is so incredibly and vastly different than the south 'pole'. Why is that, if the Earth is a spinning ball?
The far-more-frigid cold in the south does not match what is found in the north at the same distance from the equator.
These things do not fit the Ball Earth model at all - it makes no sense; however, they fit the Flat Earth model perfectly.
I find the north-vs-south comparison to be one of the most compelling evidences that the Earth is not a spinning ball.