That was his second go at it in 1968.
But Nixon became president anyway, didn't he?
But Nixon became president anyway, didn't he?
And an unattractive, anti-American, anti-Christian, cigarette smoking, metrosexual, homosexual, islamic communist at that. Did I mention he's a treason punk?
That was his second go at it in 1968.
Then wasn't Nixon involved with the whole Watergate ordeal?
Let it gooo... Let it gooo...
reading a few comments there is one conversation I'd like to approach about Trickle Down economics.
It only works in a truly Free Market Capitalist economy. when those "dogs" want to keep all 10 "bones", the other "dogs" keep them in check. The weakness of a Free Market Capitalist economy is Laziness, irresponsibility, and Lack of entrepeneurial spirit from the majority or the whole population.
And that introduces Crony Capitalism which introduced Socialism which will introduce Communism.
I've never understood the whole free market economy = no compassion thing. Are other economic systems really any more compassionate?
they really aren't and I don't understand how that applies to my statement.
It's 3:00AM and you mentioned economics systems. My brain answered accordingly. I should sleep.
Sing it, brother.
Imagine the long, acrimonious argument that would've gone on for pages and pages. That said, it would be in perfect keeping with the spirit of the OP.
People are changing after debating here (News Forum) for some period of time. Some for the better, some for the worse. I know I have changed for the worse. Yet, there are people, where you after debating them for some time wouldn't think would change. Whenever they do, it's surprising, and as for you, disappointing. I may be stupid, but for some reason I thought you were above all this bickering and name calling business.
I've made it very clear that my quarrel is not with you, but the monstrosity that is this thread. I'm disappointed because the whole spirit of this thing is beneath you and that you responded by saying you're tired elevating your argument.
I understand where this thread comes from- probably a deeply personal place. Which probably makes it rather difficult for you to understand that this is not a merciless pounding of you personally. I have not so far nor will I ever call you names or indicate your value as a person and a Christian is any less than any other poster on this forum. Calling out salvation or questioning motives is not a game I play.
It is, however, a merciless pounding of a thread that started as contemptuous rant devoid of reason or any real discussion point. If I were a mod, I would have stricken this one from the news subforum by page 2 for the good of the site and the poster.
What happened to CharlieGrown?
Mr Desdichado, your take on the thread is your personal view on it. As goes for your assertion that it was a contemptuous rant devoid of reason. There's a lot conservatives that agree with what I wrote.
Please don't resort to acting like an amateur psychologist, it doesn't look good on your part.
I don't want to argue, but instead of using language like in your response, why don't you just disagree, plain and simple? Why this urge to add highly charged rhetoric to the debate?.
As I said, I know I sometimes can be quite a bee etch, so you might could be right.
Are we good?
So the take-away from all this is that, in a true free market capitalist society, everyone should be a successful entrepreneur and/or corporate executive, and if God didn't give you the skill set to pull that off you deserve to be sick and live under a bridge.
Hokay, good to know...
Sheesh. Jesus must be rolling over in His grave.