F
FreeNChrist
Guest
I think you are probably right. you are not under good, just, & holy. you said it. not me.
God has said that Christians are not under the Law. He said it, not me.
I think you are probably right. you are not under good, just, & holy. you said it. not me.
It's like a knee-jerk reaction almost to call law-keepers "anti-Christ"? You can' lump all the laws articulated by Paul together because you cause confusion. When Paul says "law" he's not always talking about the same law. So let's simplify it (although we can get even more specific if we need to), all of the things God told the levites to do were a placeholder and never meant to be the true ministration because they represented what Christ would do. It's those things ya don't wanna go back to. To go back to those things are indeed "anti-Christ". Not talking about going back to those things.
Ok, now that that's been established lets speak on the commandments, which are ALSO called "Law" but you know we mean the commandments:
"The law was made for the unrighteous". Exactly true. This is exactly what both yours and my list explaining the function of the law describes. Society's law shows what a crime is so to God's law shows was a sin is. But these laws are NOT Moses' laws but God's laws given through Moses.
The Holy Spirit was given on the same holy day as the laws written on the tables of stone. The Holy Spirit is the embodiment of those same laws. Those tables were a representation of the Holy Spirit. The difference between the tablets and The Holy Spirit is you can't place stone tablets in a person's heart; they're always on the outside of a person, never entering in. Thus the Holy Spirit is the fulfillment of God's promise in Jeremiah:
Jeremiah 31:33
For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my (GOD'S, NOT MOSES') law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
...and of Ezekiel
Ezekiel 36:27
And I will put my Spirit in you and move you to follow my decrees and be careful to keep my (GOD'S, NOT MOSES') laws.
These are the same laws, just made alive by the Spirit of God. They're not dead on a block of stone unable to affect a change. But I haven't pick which ones I want to follow and which ones I don't want to follow. God's law does that all on it's on because NOT every laws was for everyone. For instance,
There were laws for the priests which other people couldn't do. There were law for when one is in the promised land which can't be don't when someone is away. There are laws just meant to be placeholders until the proper person could come and do them correctly (like in the case of animal sacrifices & Christ's ministry). So there's no picking and choosing I'm guilty of when I follow the scriptures that says "the blood of bulls and goats can't take away sins", that means I don't do those.
1) the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus IS the Holy Spirit who will take you back to Ezekiel 36:27
2) the law of love which will take you back to Ezekiel 36:27
3) the law of faith ( the Law is NOT of faith Gal. 3:12 ) is Justification. And once we are justified, we're taken back to Ezekiel 36:27
4) the law of liberty in Christ Jesus - is freedom; Justified. And once we are justified, we're taken back to Ezekiel 36:27
5) the law of Christ - Himself - saves us from the condemnation of the Law, so that now we can obey in love
But we are LITERALLY obeying the law to not have sex with animals because of the spirit in us. It makes no sense to say we don't have to obey. The fact that we don't want to means we automatically "are".
As to seeing Christ in the OT; that's exactly what I was getting at in my first post on this thread. Do you see Christ in the sapphire stones? Descending from heaven and being broken for man's sin?
Christ showed God's laws in their true form. To "go back" that Paul was referring to was to sacrifice for sin.
Gen 26:5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.
Luk 1:6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.
I find it strange and confusing when people say nobody could obey the commands, that's simply not in the scriptures, think about it, would you command your child to do something you knew they could never do, and then appoint condemnation when they don't? I just don't get it.....
Galatians 2:16 (NASB)
[SUP]16 [/SUP] nevertheless knowing thata man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified.
John tells us exactly what God's commandments are in the "New Covenant" and His commandments are not burdensome!
1 John 3:22-23 (NASB)
[SUP]22 [/SUP] and whatever we ask we receive from Him, because we keep His commandments and do the things that are pleasing in His sight.
[SUP]23 [/SUP] This is His commandment, that we believe in the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, just as He commanded us.
God's commandments in the New Covenant are to believe in the name of His Son Jesus Christ and to love one another. This means to believe in everything that the Lord Jesus did for us in His finished work.
The Old Covenant is now obsolete and is now gone ( Hebrews 8:13 ) - the last temple sacrifices stopped in 70 AD when Titus came in and destroyed the city of Jerusalem.
We now live by the life of Christ in us and not in the oldness of the letter. People are not going to commit spiritual adultery on the Lord Jesus by going back to the law for living. His life by the Holy Spirit being manifested in and through us is how the true Christian lives now.
(I mean this seriously, honestly, gently...)
I think I understand the attraction of Hebrew Roots
it's fun to pretend to be Jewish
(I mean this seriously, honestly, gently...)
I think I understand the attraction of Hebrew Roots
it's fun to pretend to be Jewish
Would giving away your wife to another man to have sex with her count as being "lawful"? This is exactly what Abraham did - twice. We have just been religiously programmed to think whenever we see "commandment" - we think of the Law only.
All men have sinned and sin is the transgression of the Law - so it's easy "to get".....if we don't think of commandments as only the "Law" given by Moses.
God dealt with Abraham through a covenant of grace - not the Law as given by Moses.
In Luke 1 - they were blameless because they kept the temple sacrifices.
Here is Paul talking about being blameless too as to his interpretation of the Law. Phil 3:2-9 ( Notice Paul deals with the dogs - the evil workers - those trying to get people to go back to the Law for living in verse 2-3 ..Paul calls them the false circumcision)
Philippians 3:6 (NASB)
[SUP]6 [/SUP] as to zeal, a persecutor of the church; as to the righteousness which is in the Law, found blameless.
And yet Paul said that he was the chief of sinners and a coveter.
Paul who knew the Law better then anyone had this to say about the purpose of the law.
The purpose of the law was :
1) To reveal our sinful state. Rom 3:20
2) To inflame sin Rom 7:8
3) To minister death in us Rom 7:10-11
4) To lead us to Christ Gal 3:24
The law is good, holy and spiritual but we are in the flesh. Jesus fulfilled all the law! When we read the law we should be seeing Jesus in it. Jesus did not save us so that we could go back to the law.
But the purpose of the law was not for righteousness or salvation at all, it was to manifest sin in our lives, so that the purpose of grace which is in Jesus is to manifest salvation. Grace does not set aside the law, but completely satisfied it
Gen 26:5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.
Luk 1:6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.
I find it strange and confusing when people say nobody could obey the commands, that's simply not in the scriptures, think about it, would you command your child to do something you knew they could never do, and then appoint condemnation when they don't? I just don't get it.....
I like the way you stated that.
Yes, we are all sinners. I often think about David and His adultery and murder. There was no sacrifice at the temple he could make to God for a wilful sinning. His only recourse was to repent, confess his sins, and accept God's forgiveness. Can anyone say "that's grace" before Jesus came?
seriously? did you even read the account of which you speak? do you really think Abraham did as you said? or what the bible actually says, and none of what you wrote properly addressed my question... its ok I didn't expect it would....Would giving away your wife to another man to have sex with her count as being "lawful"? This is exactly what Abraham did - twice. We have just been religiously programmed to think whenever we see "commandment" - we think of the Law only.
All men have sinned and sin is the transgression of the Law - so it's easy "to get".....if we don't think of commandments as only the "Law" given by Moses.
God dealt with Abraham through a covenant of grace - not the Law as given by Moses.
In Luke 1 - they were blameless because they kept the temple sacrifices.
Here is Paul talking about being blameless too as to his interpretation of the Law. Phil 3:2-9 ( Notice Paul deals with the dogs - the evil workers - those trying to get people to go back to the Law for living in verse 2-3 ..Paul calls them the false circumcision)
Philippians 3:6 (NASB)
[SUP]6 [/SUP] as to zeal, a persecutor of the church; as to the righteousness which is in the Law, found blameless.
And yet Paul said that he was the chief of sinners and a coveter.
Paul who knew the Law better then anyone had this to say about the purpose of the law.
The purpose of the law was :
1) To reveal our sinful state. Rom 3:20
2) To inflame sin Rom 7:8
3) To minister death in us Rom 7:10-11
4) To lead us to Christ Gal 3:24
The law is good, holy and spiritual but we are in the flesh. Jesus fulfilled all the law! When we read the law we should be seeing Jesus in it. Jesus did not save us so that we could go back to the law.
But the purpose of the law was not for righteousness or salvation at all, it was to manifest sin in our lives, so that the purpose of grace which is in Jesus is to manifest salvation. Grace does not set aside the law, but completely satisfied it
I think you may have made a few erroneous assumptions here.
1st Is your argument that Abraham sinned. Well that is true as all have sinned, Yet of Abraham it is said he obeyed. Thus we find that Gods love and Grace was in action even in His day. So much so that a sinner was transformed and seen by God as fully obedient.
You said "God dealt with Abraham through a covenant of grace - not the Law as given by Moses."
First problem here is you seem to be making out that God gave Grace to Abraham and then did not to those of Moses.
God actually gave the same covenant that He gave to Abraham to Israel through Moses because of his promise to Abraham.
Second you need to see that the law is not one book but 5, which includes the story of Abraham. That this law/5 books were written by Moses for Israel who had the law. Genesis was and should be read in light of all that took place in the day of Moses. When it says that Abraham obeyed Gods laws and commandments it is written for Israel who know the law and the commandments. The difference is that Abraham was taught them on a personal level. like Moses. Abraham commanded His household after him while Moses commanded a nation.
When we disconnect them we come up with funny and faulty views.
Here is the problem that I see you making, You argue from a legal perspective. But are you sure that those who argue with are keeping the law in the way you assume?
Or do they do it as Abraham and Paul did, by faith in God, a loving relationship that transformed them. Thus they both did not strive at the law Yet kept it. Unlike those who stirved at the law and could not keep it.
I like how Paul showed the mistake here:
Rom 9:30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.
Rom 9:31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.
Rom 9:32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;
Rom 9:33 As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
Blessings
my beloved brethren, in God's economy, there's no us! we are death (Col 3:3-5) how can someone who is death continues to keep any law whatsoever? The Son has replaced us!!!!(Gal 2 ;20). This is the mystery of God that He hid even before the foundations of the world!!! That we will live the life of another; that we will be defined by another!!Its not about the Laws that are in question, its where your Heart is that is in question. Are you keeping the Laws because you believe its mandatory for entrance into Heaven? Or are you keeping the Laws because you Love Jesus?
Gen 6:8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.
Exo 33:12 And Moses said unto the LORD, See, thou sayest unto me, Bring up this people: and thou hast not let me know whom thou wilt send with me. Yet thou hast said, I know thee by name, and thou hast also found grace in my sight.
amazing isn't it?
I argue from New Covenant perspective. The real Christian is not under the Law in any capacity.
of course it wouldn't be the same word in Hebrew as it is in koine greek but the meaning is essentially the same, as usuall no scripture whatsoever in proper context to even begin to back up what you claim. the Father does NOT change and as such His grace changes not as well. too much twistianity going on... this is why manys faith is so weak and ineffective in the face of the darkness of this age...Gods graciousness (hen) in the OT, is not new covenant grace (charis). The new covenant concept of grace did not exist in the context of the old covenant. "Grace...was realized in Jesus Christ" (John 1:17). IOW new covenant grace "came into being," "came to pass," "happened" historically in Jesus Christ.
of course it wouldn't be the same word in Hebrew as it is in koine greek but the meaning is essentially the same, as usuall no scripture whatsoever in proper context to even begin to back up what you claim. the Father does NOT change and as such His grace changes not as well. too much twistianity going on... this is why manys faith is so weak and ineffective in the face of the darkness of this age...
of course it wouldn't be the same word in Hebrew as it is in koine greek but the meaning is essentially the same, as usuall no scripture whatsoever in proper context to even begin to back up what you claim. the Father does NOT change and as such His grace changes not as well. too much twistianity going on... this is why manys faith is so weak and ineffective in the face of the darkness of this age...
I argue from New Covenant perspective. The real Christian is not under the Law in any capacity. The Law did it's job and now we are in Christ. To go back to the Law for living is committing spiritual adultery on our Lord Jesus. Romans 7:1-6. We have died to the Law SO THAT we can be joined to Another - Christ Himself.
Paul who knew the Law better then anyone had this to say about the purpose of the law.
The purpose of the law was :
1) To reveal our sinful state. Rom 3:20
2) To inflame sin Rom 7:8
3) To minister death in us Rom 7:10-11
4) To lead us to Christ Gal 3:24
The law is good, holy and spiritual but we are in the flesh. Jesus fulfilled all the law! When we read the law we should be seeing Jesus in it. Jesus did not save us so that we could go back to the law.
But the purpose of the law was not for righteousness or salvation at all, it was to manifest sin in our lives, so that the purpose of grace which is in Jesus is to manifest salvation. Grace does not set aside the law, but completely satisfied it.
If people want to be "law-keepers" then that is your choice but it is not the New Covenant no matter how much you try to make it. There are modern day Judaizers trying to get Christians to go back to keeping the Law just like they tried when Paul preached the gospel.
It is anti-Christ in it's belief system and denies the Lord Jesus Christ and what He did in His work on the cross and resurrection.
Remember Paul said in the last days people would be "anti-Christ" NOT "anti-God".
This describes the modern day Judaizers trying to pervert the gospel of the grace of Christ. Paul had some very harsh words to say about these Judaizers. Repent and trust in Christ's work - He is more then enough! You can trust His life in us to lead us now because we eat from the tree of Life now - which is Christ Himself.