Trinity haters on CC

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 7, 2015
6,057
78
0
#21
So for the sake of confusion, you DO agree with the illustration that I posted?
I believe the illustration you posted teaches confusion, what I posted in post #2 is as simple as it can be said. People who do not understand who the Son is tend to make it more confusing than it has to be.


What I said is shown here.... 1 John 5:7 "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."

But even many will say "no" to this Truth as well because the Son has not been revealed in them.
 
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
#22
Well, I'll chip in my thoughts.

The word 'Trinity' is not 'Biblical'. The word used in the NT is translated 'Godhead'. A previous poster has already said this.

The NT writers clearly believed (as do I) that the Father is God, the Son, Jesus Christ is God and the Holy Spirit is God. They also believed that God is one God.

Then they went on to state various stuff about Father, Son and Holy Spirit, even at some points saying that One did the same as another One.

They didn't try - at any time - to define 'Godhead' (certainly not by the word 'Trinity'). They just spoke about it/Him (the Godhead word is not personal but a label although God is so I use both pronouns so you can use your preference).

Then came along the early Church fathers who found that this wasn't a very good state of affairs and began formulating theology and theory - instead of just accepting what the early Church believed. They then coined the translated word 'Trinity'.

And that's where it went very pear-shaped. It really would be much easier if we just talked about the Godhead and accepted what the NT says about it/Him without trying to go *too much* further.

What word would you prefer for describing the triune nature of God?
 
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
#23
I believe the illustration you posted teaches confusion, what I posted in post #2 is as simple as it can be said. People who do not understand who the Son is tend to make it more confusing than it has to be.


What I said is shown here.... 1 John 5:7 "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."

But even many will say "no" to this Truth as well because the Son has not been revealed in them.
There is nothing "simple" about understanding the nature of God. Which is why the language we use in trying to do so is so important.
 

Zmouth

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2012
3,391
134
63
#26
I would be interested in hearing someone explain how did they came to believe in the Trinity, did they hear about in Church or did they learn some other way?
 
Y

yoninah

Guest
#28
It does not describe His nature as 'Triune'.
My original post on this subject is that the Biblical writers didn't refer to a definition to describe God except Godhead. It's best to read what I wrote there to save me repeating much in this post. They said 'Godhead' and described what the Godhead did/does and is. It was good enough for them. It's good enough for me.
 

prove-all

Senior Member
May 16, 2014
5,977
400
83
63
#29
What I said is shown here.... 1 John 5:7
"For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost:
and these three are one."

.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comma_Johanneum

The Comma Johanneum (or Johannine Comma or Heavenly Witnesses) is a comma
(a short clause) in the First Epistle of John, 1 John 5:7–8.


The scholarly consensus is that that passage is a Latin corruption that entered
the Greek manuscript tradition in subsequent copies.
 
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
#30
My original post on this subject is that the Biblical writers didn't refer to a definition to describe God except Godhead. It's best to read what I wrote there to save me repeating much in this post. They said 'Godhead' and described what the Godhead did/does and is. It was good enough for them. It's good enough for me.
And my question remains. Trinity is just a word for the Christian understanding of the triune nature of God. What word would you prefer? And Godhead won't cut it.
 
Y

yoninah

Guest
#31
And my question remains. Trinity is just a word for the Christian understanding of the triune nature of God. What word would you prefer? And Godhead won't cut it.
It will. It's fine. And that will be as far as I go as we're going round in circles. The NT used 'Godhead', they didn't use 'Trinity'. I shall do the same. Thanks for the discussion...
 
Jan 7, 2015
6,057
78
0
#32

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,769
3,678
113
#33
I would be interested in hearing someone explain how did they came to believe in the Trinity, did they hear about in Church or did they learn some other way?
I was shown various Scriptures pointing to the fact that each Person was addressed as God either directly or indirectly.
 
F

FreeNChrist

Guest
#34
I would be interested in hearing someone explain how did they came to believe in the Trinity, did they hear about in Church or did they learn some other way?
For me it was seeing Jesus as God, just as it was for those very first Christians. It was Jesus revelation of Himself as God that neccessitated a drastic change in their thinking about the nature of God as it had been thought of up to that point.
 
S

skylove7

Guest
#35
That's just sad people hatin' on Trinity
You would think they would use that negativity toward the devil where it belongs!
 
S

sparkman

Guest
#36
Well, I'll chip in my thoughts.

The word 'Trinity' is not 'Biblical'. The word used in the NT is translated 'Godhead'. A previous poster has already said this.

The NT writers clearly believed (as do I) that the Father is God, the Son, Jesus Christ is God and the Holy Spirit is God. They also believed that God is one God.

Then they went on to state various stuff about Father, Son and Holy Spirit, even at some points saying that One did the same as another One.

They didn't try - at any time - to define 'Godhead' (certainly not by the word 'Trinity'). They just spoke about it/Him (the Godhead word is not personal but a label although God is so I use both pronouns so you can use your preference).

Then came along the early Church fathers who found that this wasn't a very good state of affairs and began formulating theology and theory - instead of just accepting what the early Church believed. They then coined the translated word 'Trinity'.

And that's where it went very pear-shaped. It really would be much easier if we just talked about the Godhead and accepted what the NT says about it/Him without trying to go *too much* further.
"Godhead" is an English word, and the Bible is written in Greek. Therefore, Godhead is not a biblical word either.

If you want to be precise, use the word theotēs. If you insist upon precision, then be fully precise. I know that KJV people insist on the word Godhead but the apostles didn't use King Jimmy..it didn't drop out of Jesus' sleeve as he ascended.

The word Trinity or Triune is a word used to confine a concept, so it is not wrong in itself. For example, we don't find the word Bible in the Bible either, but we know it's a "collection of 66 books that comprise the Old and New Testament canon". The Bible doesn't use the word Millennium either, but we know it refers to the "1000 year reign of Jesus Christ". If I held a similar position regarding those concepts, I'd simply use the phrases in quotes instead of the short descriptive word of Bible and Millennium. That would get tiring though.

Words which describe concepts are not wrong, else we need to revamp much of our vocabulary.

Rapture is another such word. The word actually comes from the Latin translation of the Greek word harpagisometha. Yet, we use the word Rapture in order to describe this concept, and not many people have problems with that.

Godhead is just an old English word. I personally don't like to use it and use Triune or Trinity. Also, it sounds nasty to me so I don't like to use it in reference to God. Triunity might be a better word but Trinity suits me fine. I don't cater to KJVers or cultists.
 
Last edited:
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#37
Perhaps this has not been revealed to you. :)

Matthew 11:27
All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.


God the Father,Jesus the Son and the Holy Ghost. That is what Scripture says.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,431
0
#39
me too!..lol..me thinks he hath a forward spirit abouteth him ( just kidding Sparkman..playin' on a King Jimmie talk )
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#40
I would be interested in hearing someone explain how did they came to believe in the Trinity, did they hear about in Church or did they learn some other way?
Its in the Bible,three in one.The word trinity isn't in the Bible,but the concept is there. The Father,Son,Holy Spirit all referred to in the Word. All you got to do is read it for yourself.