I do not get my bible doctrinal beliefs from Wikipedia. not form any english dictionary.
The basis of the argument about repentance was saying what the greek meant.
My point is you need to look at where repentance comes from in the law.
It is the response to guilt, finding out you have sinned. In the law it is by offering a sacrifice.
For those like in Nineveh it was sackcloth and ashes.
Now words in the christian church have been used for thousands of years and their intent is the same.
But the attempt here is to say we should not feel bad about sin, but acknowledge we are forgiven and walk on.
Now this is a simple lie.
The law was given and instruction of sacrifice for sin, which took effort and cost money was to underline recognition of sin is important to God and putting it right, crucial.
But this hyper grace approach is actually to ignore sin, not even mention it and just focus on forgiveness.
What is being missed is everyone is focusing on forgiveness as well, and confession. But most churches deny sin even exists and want to hide it when it does, and appear ok or perfect. Hyper grace claim sin is bringing condemnation so there must be nothing said about it, which is just brushing issues under the carpet.
After listening to the preachers, I have no desire to change my life or understand even a word they are expressing. It is like they are following a different God, and there is no brokeness or help to see my true self before the Lord and make progress.
Most people are desperate for deep seated problems to be resolved, yet what is being shared is nothing to do with resolution only further chaos.