S
Sirk
Guest
There are far too many posts here with a "I'm not condoning what the shooter did BUT..." vibe to them.
Perhaps you could look at it like he was just aborting people in their 30th and beyond trimester.
There are far too many posts here with a "I'm not condoning what the shooter did BUT..." vibe to them.
Perhaps you could look at it like he was just aborting people in their 30th and beyond trimester.
Well I guess thats one way of looking at it.
Obvious solution: ban abortion and guns.
Islam and guns. Abortion and guns.
You want to run a country like christianchat?
Obvious solution: ban abortion and guns.
What about "stones?" People were stoned to death for years. What about "ropes?" Hung by the neck until dead. What about alcohol? People killed by drunk drivers. What about "knives?" Anyone ever been stabbed to death? What about sticks/clubs/hammers and what not? People ever been bludgeoned to death? What about.............aw.........well.......
Why not just BAN PEOPLE? No, wait, that's what the abortion rights people want.......sigh
I see. So basically both women, she on the right and she on the left, will to let the child be divided in two so long as they get to keep their piece.
Great sorrow this is for the land and this people is then condemned to be consumed with famine and sword. May God protect the child and nourish him.
Wait..........WHUT? Did you post your comment to the wrong "quoted post?" It makes no sense whatsoever with regards to what I posted about your comment to "ban all guns."
Nope, that was the reply to you.
Two women, the rightist and the leftist. One child, America. Both would rather cut the child in twain than spare his life by giving up their guns and abortions. Therefore sterility and violence they themselves condemn their own land and children to. I will not divide the child so I will hope God will protect and nourish him because these two women will not.
Nope, that was the reply to you.
Two women, the rightist and the leftist. One child, America. Both would rather cut the child in twain than spare his life by giving up their guns and abortions. Therefore sterility and violence they themselves condemn their own land and children to. I will not divide the child so I will hope God will protect and nourish him because these two women will not.
What? Did you just equate gun control with abortion....like....if we give up our guns they'll give up abortion? Or...if the gun control people just walk away the judge will know who the child really belongs too and will give the child back to the one who walks away? Your post is a mess man. Just sayin.
You're closer than he got. It's not about who will pretend to and would walk away, but who would actually give up their tool of mass death. Indeed, if the rightist gave up the devil's bow and arrow (and I did not make that term up btw), then I would know they are the true Christians and were willing to do whatever it takes to save the people and indeed truly the authority over America would be commended into their hands.
Your comment/example makes no sense whatsoever with my comment.................either you are confused, or simply did not understand what I said........either way, your comment is in no way reflective of what I stated............Here, read it again............
What about "stones?" People were stoned to death for years. What about "ropes?" Hung by the neck until dead. What about alcohol? People killed by drunk drivers. What about "knives?" Anyone ever been stabbed to death? What about sticks/clubs/hammers and what not? People ever been bludgeoned to death? What about.............aw.........well.......
Why not just BAN PEOPLE? No, wait, that's what the abortion rights people want.......sigh
There............now try to read it with understanding
You're closer than he got. It's not about who will pretend to and would walk away, but who would actually give up their tool of mass death. Indeed, if the rightist gave up the devil's bow and arrow (and I did not make that term up btw), then I would know they are the true Christians and were willing to do whatever it takes to save the people and indeed truly the authority over America would be commended into their hands.
No I got what you're saying the first time, it's a very cliché and old argument of excuses to not do that which is right. Just thought I'd change it up a bit rather than tell you to go ahead and ban all that you request.
You're closer than he got. It's not about who will pretend to and would walk away, but who would actually give up their tool of mass death. Indeed, if the rightist gave up the devil's bow and arrow (and I did not make that term up btw), then I would know they are the true Christians and were willing to do whatever it takes to save the people and indeed truly the authority over America would be commended into their hands.
What kind of tools of mass death do Gods armies have? Are they used for benevolence or malevolence? I think that is the distinction you miss....there is nothing good about killing babies....there is nothing good about murdering with a gun....but a gun in the hands of many righteous men will keep many babies and mommies off the berm of a ditch.
Getting rid of guns is something for the wicked to fear, not the righteous.
Isaiah 54:17
[SUP]17 [/SUP]No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord, and their righteousness is of me, saith the Lord.