Catholic Heresy (for the record)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Feb 26, 2015
737
7
0
Exodus 20:3-5
[SUP]3 [/SUP] You shall have no other gods before Me.
[SUP]4 [/SUP] "You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth;
[SUP]5 [/SUP] you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me,

John 14:15
[SUP]15 [/SUP] "If you love Me, keep My commandments.

1 John 2:3-5
[SUP]3 [/SUP] Now by this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments.
[SUP]4 [/SUP] He who says, "I know Him," and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.
[SUP]5 [/SUP] But whoever keeps His word, truly the love of God is perfected in him. By this we know that we are in Him.

We have tons of pictures of Pope John Paul II BOWING DOWN to a image, a statue, of Mary. We are explicitly told not to make any statues of Mary nor are we to bow down to them.

Pope John Paul II loved Mary more than he Loved God. Jesus clearly said "If you LOVE me you will keep my Commandments. Clearly Pope John Paul II had no Love for God, his love was for Mary instead. How can one claim to have received Salvation and Worship a false God at the same time? You cannot. Therefore by his very actions of Pope John Paul II proves one does not need to be a Born Again Christian to be a Pope of the Roman Catholic Church.

If the Pope John Paul II was never a Christian following God, then how can he speak for God? How can Pope John Paul II ever claim he spoke for God when he had not accepted salvation from God?

Therefore everything Pope John Paul II said was not from God and needs to tossed out of the Roman Catholic Church.
 
Feb 26, 2015
737
7
0
The Gates of Hell will never prevail against God's True Church the Protestant Church!

The Roman Catholic Church is Satan's Church.
 
Feb 26, 2015
737
7
0
I find it interesting mwc68 you seem to have no problem with fighting against God and His Children!
 
Feb 6, 2015
381
2
0
And you are another brainwashed, willing to follow a MAN MADE organization instead of Jesus, deceived by lies, Holy Spirit lacking, God hating, man loving, unable to identify yourself aside from your organization (or church <-- small "c" too BTW) lost soul that doesn't know the REAL Jesus. And you're just one of those anti-Christ RCC propagandist. You bash us at least as much if not more than "we" do you. What makes you any better than you accuse "us" of being?
Wow!!! why all the anger, not very Christian like accusing me with all theses accusations, if you don't mind me saying. Then you go on to say ....."You don’t know me, and I don’t know you either,(but you make it sound as if you do) but I would really love to get to know you better. I’d really love to hear how Jesus brought you in and regenerated you, reconciling your soul to the Fathers. I would love to hear about the changes in your life after this SUPERNATURAL event took place and what led up to it."
*What am I suppose to make of that?

I am also more than willing to share my testimony, you know the thing He arms us believers with (as mentioned in Luke 8:39, Revelation 12:11, Psalm 119:46, Titus 3:3-7, 2 Timothy 1:8-9, 1 Corinthians 2:1-5 and many others), with you anytime.
* Sure.... anytime.

It’s posted here for anyone to read, and I KNOW Jesus, and I was saved by Him without a doubt, as is confirmed by the complete and total change in my life, behavior, and heart and can be affirmed by those around me, and I didn’t need the RCC to get it.
Good to know.
 

If this is true (and I can assure you it is as can many others) what does anyone need the RCC’s "authority" for? Really?
Well my friend, let me put it to ya this way, it is apparent from Scripture alone that Jesus Christ founded a visible Church, gave its leaders completely authority on earth over all Christians, and promised that this Church would endure until the end of time. Since it would endure until the end of time there must have been a method to propagate its authority, and this is in fact illustrated by the New Testament as well: sacramental ordination of priests and bishops maintaining the line of apostolic succession.

A visible, hierarchal Church - must still exist today. If it does not than Christ was wrong - period. And there is only one Church that even claims to be the very specific, visible, hierarchal Church that Christ founded: the Catholic Church. The historical record demonstrates the unbroken line of authority from the first pontiff in Rome, Peter, to the current one, and also demonstrates very thoroughly that the teachings and practice of the early Church were identical in all crucial ways to current Catholic teaching (however surprising and shocking this notion may be to most Protestants/non-Catholics).

So you see Jimbo, it should be apparent that there is a need for authority and authoritative teaching in the life of Christians, and that it would thus be very strange if God did not provide this. The Old Covenant Jews had their source of living authority - the interpreters of the Torah, the Pharisees. (The uniformed might claim that Christ put down the Pharisees. But, of course, he rebuked some of them for their hypocrisy while making it clear that the Jews were bound to obey them: The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses' seat; so practice and observe whatever they tell you. That is, they carry Moses' authority - this "Seat of Moses" being an oral teaching of the Jews not found in any Scripture.)

The Jews needed a living authority partially because the Torah could not possibly address every single practical question in the life of every Jew - any more than the Bible addresses directly every practical issue of today. If it did, we wouldn't have Christians who could challenge the most basic moral laws that have been part of Tradition since apostolic times. What it comes down too, without a visible, hierarchal Church, your going to have the problems that Protestantism has today. Thousands of differnt sects, with thousands of differnt interpretations of Scripture, all claiming to be under the insperatin of the Holy Spirit. How do you know whom is correct, and who is not?
 

See the real difference here is that you identify as a "RCC member" that is what you are, you need the church to be saved, I only need Jesus Christ and He is my final authority (and everyone else’s too even if they don’t acknowledge it) not and MAN or group of MEN.
We’ve all heard the statement "no one can be saved outside the Catholic Church." Well, you have to understand that in a very important way. If someone knew and understood that the Catholic Church was indeed established by Jesus and that it was the one true Church and, in spite of that knowledge, still rejected the grace to be baptized and to enter the Church, that person is rejecting Jesus’ command and grace (Catechism of the Catholic Church, #846). Remember, it is the person who is rejecting Jesus, not Jesus rejecting that person. Jesus died for that person too.

But the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) hastens to say that "this affirmation is not aimed at those who through no fault of their own do not know Christ or his Church." It says that those "who do not know but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart and moved by grace try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience—those too may achieve eternal salvation" (CCC, #847). That statement draws a much bigger circle of those saved than some people think there should be. Thank God it is his judgment, not ours.

This statement is very broad for two important reasons: 1) God wants everyone saved (Jn 3:17). 2) Jesus died for every person without exception. He died for sinners (1 Tim 2:4 ). So no person—and not even the Church on earth—can begin to separate those saved from those not saved without placing restrictions on God’s universal will for the salvation of all his children. That is why God alone is the judge as to eternal salvation. That is why the Church will canonize saints but will never declare any specific person to be in hell. Many people can make a list of individuals they think should be eternally damned, but no person on earth can make that judgment. We just don’t know. Only God knows.

It is important to realize that the Church is the Body of Christ and that body and all who seek God, even without the advantage of knowing the true Church, are related to that body in a special way. God does not demand the impossible. People can only do what they are able to in the circumstances of their lives. As important and wonderful as it is to be graced with faith in the Church established by Jesus, human circumstances often simply make this impossible for every living human.

LOL you have to love the anti-RCC accusations, I am not on a RCC site, you are on a "protestant" (I actually hate that label) site, so who is attacking who here?
Not attacking at all..... just refuting the fallices of Catholicism. And as far as the "label" you speak of, let me ask you this. Do you follow the beliefs of John Calvin, or Martin Luther, or any other, early Protestant reformer? If so, you are protesting the Catholic Church by your actions, or your lack of actions and by your beliefs and by rejecting those Christian truths found in Catholicism... the Church that preceded all other Protestant denominations. So by doing so.... you are a Protestant, plain and simple.
 

Pax Christi
 

"from henceforth, all generations shall call me Blessed." ---Luke 1:48.



 
 
 
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
I find it interesting mwc68 you seem to have no problem with fighting against God and His Children!
If you are referring to yourself, I find no Christianity in you at all, just another bigot bent on telling Catholics we are second class citizens. You have no Love for us and this is ridiculous the way you say we are satans church. That is BS!!!
 
Feb 6, 2015
381
2
0
The Gates of Hell will never prevail against God's True Church the Protestant Church!
Really, can you back that up with showing the unbroken chain of Apostolic Succession in Protestantism, like the Catholic Church can?

The Roman Catholic Church is Satan's Church.
If so.... she is doing a pretty poor job at it!!! Lol!!
 
B

Brother_J_BELGIUM

Guest
Tell me all you Catholics, where in the Bible did God every say it was a Tradition of His Church that Mary was without sin? Where did Jesus Christ ever say Mary was without sin?

The problem with the Catholics is they do not accept the Scriptures from God as the ONLY source of the Truth. They also believe that Satan also has Truths that God does not have.

If God does not have all the Truth then who else besides God has the Truth? If you Catholics claim your Church has Truths that God does not have, then in essence you are saying the Catholic Church is equal to God.

Does this not prove that today the Roman Catholic Church is a Cult? A Cult that believes it has Truths that God does not have. A Cult that actually has Mary for their God.

Did you know mwc68 and fordman that you are caught up in a Cult?

But the Catholic Church is apostate because the Catholic Church Worships Mary as their God.
The only basis to build our faith upon, is God's Word itself. Many Catholics say that it's wrong to say that we shouldn't follow the teachings and traditions of the early Catholic church because "they couldn't possibly be wrong from the beginning in the Church era". The way REAL Christians ACTED in the beginning after all, is recorded in the book of ACTS.

The way how REAL Christians should ACT is described in the book of ACTS, logically.

They gathered on the first day of the week (Sunday), they baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, they speak about "the Church that is in his house" (!). There's no church building or organization, there's just the Church that is in someone's house. PERSONS are in houses, as we also can read in the book of Acts.
 

Budman

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2014
4,153
1,999
113
And by impotent posts like this, it's evident that you have no valid response.


Pax Christi


from henceforth, all generations shall call me Blessed.' --- Luke 1:48

Tell me Ford - do Muslims worship the same God as Christians? Pope Benedict XVI said they do. Would a true Christian ever kiss the satanic Koran? Pope John II did.

Would Jesus say or do those things?

He never would.

You belong to an apostate "church".
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
Really, can you back that up with showing the unbroken chain of Apostolic Succession in Protestantism, like the Catholic Church can?
That is simply a bare faced lie. Until round 150 AD there was no 'chain of bishops'. Any such chain is just an invention. The Roman Catholic church in Rome did not have a monarchical bishop. There were numerous joint bishops. This is evidenced by both Clement of Rome and Ignatius of Antioch. The so-called early 'chain' is simply an invention and contradictory. Futhermore, go to Leeds Roman Catholic Cathedral in the UK. They are at least honest enough to admit that the chain of Roman bishops for the first three hundred years is uncertain.

 
Feb 6, 2015
381
2
0
Tell me Ford - do Muslims worship the same God as Christians? Pope Benedict XVI said they do.
As Christians, Catholic and Protestant, we pray to the God of Abraham. So do Muslims and Jews. Muslims reject the divinity of Jesus Christ, as do Jews. Jews continue to wait for a Messiah. Therefore if I believe in the God of Abraham and say my Muslim coworker believes in the God of Abraham, and my Jewish neighbor believes in the God of Abraham, we all three believe in the same God. However, we also all three believe different things about that God.
So to answer your question.... Muslims have a very incorrect belief about the one true God, but they beleive in God none the less, the God of Abraham,Isaac,and Jacob, Allah.


Would a true Christian ever kiss the satanic Koran? Pope John II did.
Well Budman, let us look at the situation in question. At that time, the Pope has longed to go to Iraq in order to walk in the footsteps of Abraham, claimed as a father in faith by Muslims, Jews, and Christians. Pope John Paul II had seen first hand the debth of man’s inhumanity to his brothers and sisters. Our history as a world is written in blood. As illustrated in his many Mea Culpas, he strives for a new understanding between peoples where dialogue, tolerance, and cooperation will replace anathemas, persecution, and rivalry. Abraham is an integral figure of unity in turning things around politically. Looking at the incident in question, the Holy Father received a delegation that included the Shiite Imam of Khadum Mosque, the Sunni President of the council that operates the Iraqi Islamic Bank, and a member of the Iraqi Ministry of Religion. The invitation of a papal visit was renewed. They even went so far as to say that it would be "a grace from heaven". While Iraq has been guilty of real violations of human rights, this Islamic state had been the most tolerant of Christians than any of its islamic neighbors. Many Catholics held positions in government, commerce, education, etc. The Chaldean Patriarch of Babylon (Iraq), His Beatitude Raphael I Bidawid, who was a major spokesman for the delegation. He applauded the Pope’s actions and words as a true sign of concern from the Successor of St. Peter. (Christians represent 5% of the 20 million people in Iraq. Catholics of the large Chaldean rite [implementing the Aramaic language] and of the smaller Latin rite represent 80% of all Christians there.) It was said that a papal visit would confirm the faith of Christian believers while showing forth a genuine love for all in this mostly Muslim nation.

The Koran was a gift to him from the delegation. Islamic peoples are not casual in the giving of gifts. It represents the giver. They knew perfectly well that the Pope was a Catholic Christian, but they gave to him that which was regarded as most important in their life, their own holy book. Thus, at the end of the audience, the Pope showed his deep appreciation to this intimate self-donation, by bowing and kissing the Koran as a sign of respect. Such a gesture ran totally against the grain of crusades and condemnations. It did not mean that the Pope accepted all that was in the book, only that his love for the Muslim people, and the Iraqis in particular, was genuine. He made the first move, not in the capitulation of our faith, but in the recognition that the followers of Jesus and those who cherish Mohammed should not be engaged in name-calling, or worse, killing each other. The Pope appreciated the suffering of the Iraqi people, particularly the women and children. It showed he did not look down upon them but had a genuine respect for them within the brotherhood of man.

I think many of us (myself included) do not know much about Islam. The Pope understood Islam and recognized it in many common messages. People how must hate something in order to love something else are the reason why there are world wars and much suffering in the world.

Would Jesus say or do those things?
Well, lets see. He hung around sinners His whole life. He chose men that were sinners to follow Him. We are sinners, yet He loves us. So if we are to be Christ-like, true Christians are to hate sin, not sinners. One might show human respect to something like the Koran, particularly given its antiquity and meaning to so many; however, this is all a Christian and Jew can do. It is not our book. We neither acknowledge it as inspired nor as inerrant. We do not claim it as God’s Word. Indeed, it conflicts in many places with what God has genuinely revealed to us as his truth.

He never would.
Are you absolutly sure about that?


You belong to an apostate "church".
That is so ridiculous I won't even justify it with an answer. {Rolling eyes}
 
 

Pax Christi

"from henceforth, all generations shall call me Blessed." ---Luke 1:48.
 
B

Brother_J_BELGIUM

Guest
As Christians, Catholic and Protestant, we pray to the God of Abraham. So do Muslims and Jews. Muslims reject the divinity of Jesus Christ, as do Jews. Jews continue to wait for a Messiah. Therefore if I believe in the God of Abraham and say my Muslim coworker believes in the God of Abraham, and my Jewish neighbor believes in the God of Abraham, we all three believe in the same God. However, we also all three believe different things about that God.
So to answer your question.... Muslims have a very incorrect belief about the one true God, but they beleive in God none the less, the God of Abraham,Isaac,and Jacob, Allah.
I'm sorry to say this but Allah used to be the Arabian moon-god and Mohammed stated that only this god can be the real God. What Mohammed did is just APPLY and USE Scriptures of the OT and sometimes NT and changed it a bit. He modernized the moon-god a bit and claimed it was the same god as that of the Jews and Christians. But it's not.
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
Well my friend, let me put it to ya this way, it is apparent from Scripture alone that Jesus Christ founded a visible Church, gave its leaders completely authority on earth over all Christians, and promised that this Church would endure until the end of time.
Yes He gave its JOINT leadership authority working in humility together. They were to establish independent churches and act as guides to them, without interfering with their independence. They were soon expanded by the inclusion of Paul, Barnabas and James the Lord's brother. There was NO suggestion of one individual being 'over' the church. Nor did the Apostles appoint a hierarchy. They appointed a large number of independent 'overseers' (episkopoi - bishops) with each church having more than one bishop,.


Since it would endure until the end of time there must have been a method to propagate its authority, and this is in fact illustrated by the New Testament as well: sacramental ordination of priests and bishops maintaining the line of apostolic succession.
The sacramental ordination of priests is an Old Testament phenomenon. There were no New Testament priests except is so far as ALL believers were priests. There was no 'apostolic succession'. That was a later invention. And even when it was invented it was from ALL the Apostles.

A visible, hierarchal Church - must still exist today. If it does not than Christ was wrong - period.
You talk such total rubbish. Christ formed an 'invisible church' made up of all who truly believed in the Lord Jesus Christ who were saved by faith alone. His Apostles constantly warned that the visible church would contain those who perverted the truth.
They said NOTHING about a hierarchy. Each independent church was to look to its own joint leaders. It was to be founded on the word of God.

A visible, hierarchal Church - must still exist today. If it does not than Christ was wrong - period. And there is only one Church that even claims to be the very specific, visible, hierarchal Church that Christ founded: the Roman Catholic Church
You talk such nonsense. It is YOU who are wrong. Christ did not found a hierarchical church. So if a visible hierarchical church exists which CLAIMS to be Christ's it is maintaining a LIE. Thus the Roman Catholic Church which has tried to seize power over all Christians is proved to be FALSE and ANTI-CHRIST.

The historical record demonstrates the unbroken line of authority from the first pontiff in Rome, Peter, to the current one,
That is an absolute lie perpetrated by the Roman Catholic church. Peter was NOT the first pontiff in Rome, and there is no unbroken line. There was NO monarchical bishop in Rome until c 150 AD. It is all fabricated. Even the later fathers with their fabrications could not agree on a succession.

and also demonstrates very thoroughly that the teachings and practice of the early Church were identical in all crucial ways to current Roman Catholic teaching (however surprising and shocking this notion may be to most Protestants/non-Catholics).
What an extraordinary statement. Nothing could be further from true Apostolic doctrine than the doctrinal fantasies of the Roman Catholic church. Let us consider some of their heresies:


growth of RC doctrine (some dates are approximate)
1 . Prayers for the dead . …………-------------------……300 A.D.

2. Making the sign of the cross ………………………… …300 A.D.
3. Veneration of angels & dead saints …………---------…….375 A.D.
4. Use of images in worship………………………………… . 375 A.D.
5. The Mass as a daily celebration……………………………… 394 A.D.
6 Beginning of the exaltation of Mary; the term, "Mother of God" applied a Council of Ephesus……………. .----------------------------------------- 431 A.D.
7 Extreme Unction (Last Rites)……………………………… ..526 A.D.
8. Doctrine of Purgatory-Gregory 1…………………………… .593 A.D..
9. Prayers to Mary & dead saints ……………………………… .600 A.D.
10. Worship of cross, images & relics ……………………… … 786 A.D.
11 Canonization of dead saints ………………………………… ..995 A.D.

12. Celibacy of priesthood …………………………………… …1079 A.D.
13. The Rosary ……………………………………………… … 1090 A.D.
14. Indulgences ……………………………………………… …..1190 A.D.
15. Transubstantiation-Innocent III …………………………… 1215 A.D.
16. Auricular Confession of sins to a priest …………………… 1215 A.D.
17. Adoration of the wafer (Host)…………………………… .. 1220 A.D.
18. Cup forbidden to the people at communion …………………..1414 A.D.
19. Purgatory proclaimed as a dogma……………………………..1439 A.D.
20. The doctrine of the Seven Sacraments confirmed …………….1439 A.D.
21 Tradition declared of equal authority with Bible by Council of Trent…………………………………………----------------… 1545 A.D.
22. Apocryphal books added to Bible ………------------……….1546 A.D.
23. Immaculate Conception of Mary……………………………….1854 A.D.
24, Infallibility of the pope in matters of faith and morals,proclaimed by the Vatican Council ……………… 1870 A.D.
25. Assumption of the Virgin Mary (bodily ascension into heaven shortly after her death) ……………………………-----------------------------------……1950 A.D.
26. Mary proclaimed Mother of the Church……………………… 1965 A.D.

And this is just a beginning.
 
Last edited:

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
Further heresies of the RC church


21 Tradition declared of equal authority with Bible by Council of Trent…………………………………………----------------… 1545 A.D.
22. Apocryphal books added to Bible ………------------……….1546 A.D.
23. Immaculate Conception of Mary……………………………….1854 A.D.
24, Infallibility of the pope in matters of faith and morals, proclaimed by the Vatican Council ……………… 1870 A.D.
25. Assumption of the Virgin Mary (bodily ascension into heaven shortly after her death) ……………………………-----------------------------------……1950 A.D.
26. Mary proclaimed Mother of the Church……………………… 1965 A.D.


21 Tradition declared of equal authority with Bible by Council of Trent…………………………………………----------------… 1545 A.D.
22. Apocryphal books added to Bible ………------------……….1546 A.D.
23. Immaculate Conception of Mary……………………………….1854 A.D.
24, Infallibility of the pope in matters of faith and morals,proclaimed by the Vatican Council ……………… 1870 A.D.
25. Assumption of the Virgin Mary (bodily ascension into heaven shortly after her death) ……………………………-----------------------------------……1950 A.D.
26. Mary proclaimed Mother of the Church……………………… 1965 A.D.



15. Transubstantiation-Innocent III …………………………… 1215 A.D.
16. Auricular Confession of sins to a priest …………………… 1215 A.D.
17. Adoration of the wafer (Host)…………………………… .. 1220 A.D.
18. Cup forbidden to the people at communion …………………..1414 A.D.
19. Purgatory proclaimed as a dogma……………………………..1439 A.D.
20. The doctrine of the Seven Sacraments confirmed …………….1439 A.D.
21 Tradition declared of equal authority with Bible by Council of Trent…………………………………………----------------… 1545 A.D.
22. Apocryphal books added to Bible ………------------……….1546 A.D.
23. Immaculate Conception of Mary……………………………….1854 A.D.
24, Infallibility of the pope in matters of faith and morals,proclaimed by the Vatican Council ……………… 1870 A.D.
25. Assumption of the Virgin Mary (bodily ascension into heaven shortly after her death) ……………………………-----------------------------------……1950 A.D.
26. Mary proclaimed Mother of the Church……………………… 1965 A.D.
 
Last edited:
Feb 6, 2015
381
2
0
That is simply a bare faced lie.

Bare faced??? If you were to say that here in the states, you'd get laughed at! Lol!
 

Until round 150 AD there was no 'chain of bishops'. Any such chain is just an invention. The Roman Catholic church in Rome did not have a monarchical bishop. There were numerous joint bishops. This is evidenced by both Clement of Rome and Ignatius of Antioch. The so-called early 'chain' is simply an invention and contradictory. Futhermore, go to Leeds Roman Catholic Cathedral in the UK. They are at least honest enough to admit that the chain of Roman bishops for the first three hundred years is uncertain.
So lets see what ya got Pop's, (evidence) the balls in your court.


Whats funny Pop's, you are disagreeing with "your" authoritative independent witness, The Encyclopedia Britannica. Lol!


"Roman Catholic authority rests upon a mandate that is traced to the action of Jesus Christ himself, when he invested Peter and, through Peter, his successors with the power of the keys in the church. Christ is the invisible head of his church, and by his authority the pope is the visible head." (Encyclopedia Britannica ©1999)



Pax Christi


"from henceforth, all generations shall call me Blessed." ---Luke 1:48
 
Jul 4, 2015
648
6
0
[SUP]How can the Catholic Church be the True Church when it teaches just the opposite of what God says?

CCC #846, and CCC #847

The Catholic Church clearly spells out in #846 that one must be in the Catholic Church to receive Salvation. In # 847 the Catholic Church clearly says those who do not know Jesus Christ can receive Salvation by their own good works.

Ephesians 2:8-9
[SUP]8 [/SUP] For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,
[SUP]9 [/SUP] not of works, lest anyone should boast.

John 3:16-18
[SUP]16 [/SUP] For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
[SUP]17 [/SUP] For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.
[SUP]18 [/SUP] He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
[/SUP]
The Catholics always oppose the Truth from God in the Scriptures. The Catholics say Salvation is received by being in the Catholic Church. God says salvation is received by Faith and Grace.

The Catholics say a person can enter into Heaven even if they do not believe in Jesus Christ. God says all those who do not believe in Jesus are condemned and cannot enter into Heaven.

So who is lying, God or the Catholics?

Seeing that it is Impossible for God to lie I would have to say its the Catholics who are lying.

Hebrews 6:18
[SUP]18 [/SUP] that by two immutable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie,

It has to be the Catholics who are lying, but why? I believe the Catholics lie because they do not have a relationship with Jesus Christ. They only have lip service to following Jesus Christ. I truly believe the Catholics have never truly accepted Jesus Christ into their Hearts. I believe they only give lip service to believing in Jesus Christ. After all even Satan believes in Jesus but yet Satan has never accepted Jesus Christ into his Heart.

I believe this is the problem with Catholics today is that they have no relationship with Jesus Christ that it is all head knowledge and not Heart driven.

Otherwise why would the Catholics teach its only by the Catholic Church a person receives Salvation if they had a True relationship with Jesus Christ?

We are told to beware false prophets in sheep's clothing.

Matthew 7:15-20
[SUP]15 [/SUP] "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.
[SUP]16 [/SUP] You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?
[SUP]17 [/SUP] Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.
[SUP]18 [/SUP] A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.
[SUP]19 [/SUP] Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
[SUP]20 [/SUP] Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

The Catholics today are false prophets trying to deceive you into following their God Mary.
 
Feb 6, 2015
381
2
0
Further heresies of the RC church


21 Tradition declared of equal authority with Bible by Council of Trent…………………………………………----------------… 1545 A.D.
22. Apocryphal books added to Bible ………------------……….1546 A.D.
23. Immaculate Conception of Mary……………………………….1854 A.D.
24, Infallibility of the pope in matters of faith and morals,proclaimed by the Vatican Council ……………… 1870 A.D.
25. Assumption of the Virgin Mary (bodily ascension into heaven shortly after her death) ……………………………-----------------------------------……1950 A.D.
26. Mary proclaimed Mother of the Church……………………… 1965 A.D.


21 Tradition declared of equal authority with Bible by Council of Trent…………………………………………----------------… 1545 A.D.
22. Apocryphal books added to Bible ………------------……….1546 A.D.
23. Immaculate Conception of Mary……………………………….1854 A.D.
24, Infallibility of the pope in matters of faith and morals,proclaimed by the Vatican Council ……………… 1870 A.D.
25. Assumption of the Virgin Mary (bodily ascension into heaven shortly after her death) ……………………………-----------------------------------……1950 A.D.
26. Mary proclaimed Mother of the Church……………………… 1965 A.D.



15. Transubstantiation-Innocent III …………………………… 1215 A.D.
16. Auricular Confession of sins to a priest …………………… 1215 A.D.
17. Adoration of the wafer (Host)…………………………… .. 1220 A.D.
18. Cup forbidden to the people at communion …………………..1414 A.D.
19. Purgatory proclaimed as a dogma……………………………..1439 A.D.
20. The doctrine of the Seven Sacraments confirmed …………….1439 A.D.
21 Tradition declared of equal authority with Bible by Council of Trent…………………………………………----------------… 1545 A.D.
22. Apocryphal books added to Bible ………------------……….1546 A.D.
23. Immaculate Conception of Mary……………………………….1854 A.D.
24, Infallibility of the pope in matters of faith and morals,proclaimed by the Vatican Council ……………… 1870 A.D.
25. Assumption of the Virgin Mary (bodily ascension into heaven shortly after her death) ……………………………-----------------------------------……1950 A.D.
26. Mary proclaimed Mother of the Church……………………… 1965 A.D.
Care to reveal the source of your information? The Encyclopedia Britannica. Lol!
 

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
126
63
you are disagreeing with "your" authoritative independent witness, The Encyclopedia Britannica. Lol!


"Roman Catholic authority rests upon a mandate that is traced to the action of Jesus Christ himself, when he invested Peter and, through Peter, his successors with the power of the keys in the church. Christ is the invisible head of his church, and by his authority the pope is the visible head." (Encyclopedia Britannica ©1999)
Nothing funny about it. The EB is simply stating what false claims the Roman Catholic church is making. It is NOT agreeing with them.

But as you accept their authority lets look at it again.

The Papacy was not organized until the second half of the 8th century. It broke away from the Eastern Church (in the Ency. Brit., 13th Ed., vol. 21, page 636) under Pippin III; also the Papacy, by Abbe Guette."
You stated your acceptance of its authority, so now BELIEVE IT.



"from henceforth, all generations shall call me a Liar"
 

Jimbone

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2014
2,971
972
113
44
Well, God is all our final authority ultimately. No difference there whether we're Catholic, Methodist, Episcopalian, whatever. However, I thought this said Christian Chat, but since I've read yours and other's threads, clearly it's a protestant site and will honor it as such.

In passing though, something I've never understood is why there is such seeming hatred for Catholics from Protestants? I mean, I understand our differences and I could even understand intense disagreement for the beliefs one follows. but these replies throughout this and other threads are vehement. Not toward the church, but the church goer. That I don't get. We worship the same God of Israel. We both believe God through His Son Jesus offers salvation through His Grace. I, too, am confident in my personal salvation and have a testimony of positive change through faith.

I personally don't even believe most Christians could tell you why they are Methodist as opposed to Baptists as opposed to evangelical other than they were brought up that way or they have family legacy at a particular church. Not different is the congregation of Catholics. We do things differently, that's true, but so do charismatics. So I don't really understand why any fellow Christian would be so horribly insensitive to another's like faith? Do I find it really strange some of the crazy things I see in a charismatic church like acting drunk in the Holy Spirit? Sure! But I would never be so insensitive as to claim their faith was demonic and heresy. If it's part of my faith that I honor the Blessed Mother Mary, then is it really necessary to dishonor her just because you're a Protestant? A protestant is nothing more than a protester. You split ways with the Catholic Church. We now have our differences, but Catholic's aren't suddenly demonic because of that! We don't hate God - on the contrary He is the reason for our existence.

I mean, good grief, I'll find myself a Christian site to go write on. Maybe even make sure it's Catholic, but in the meantime, I'm just completely lost as to why there's such loathsome vile language and insensitivity towards the personage who is Catholic. Good luck and God Bless.
That's where you're wrong. I didn't write that out of hate I wrote it out of love and I was answering on the same level his comment was on, kind of as a "point" then went on to say I'd love to get to know him and his story better and share mine as well. Also if you think he is being nice then go back and reread some stuff. I just don't understand the logic a member of the RCC coming to a site they know doesn't believe the same thing their church teaches and claiming we are "anti-Catholic" when we don’t agree with the RCC. I'm not anti-anything I'm pro Jesus, period, and we don't both believe in the same one.

I do agree with you on the denomination thing, I don't think most could tell you why either, because Jesus Christ isn't #1 in their life. See I was one of these people for at least 5 years that sat in the pew every Sunday I felt like making it and said "I'm Christian" yet knew Him not. I was told I was saved and was now a Christian by a pastor after making a promise I repeated after him, yet I was NOT saved then. In the same way I don't feel that there is a church that can do that either. He came sideways with his comment and I let myself go down to the same level, and agree that it wasn't the right way to handle it. I have just been scooped up by the Truth and when I see folks drowning in lies and deception I want to at least try to help, even though I admittedly did a pretty poor job with that comment. I'm more than happy to share and learn more about anyone, but the whole "you all just pick on us poor Catholics" mentality on a site that openly rejects the RCC doctrine as heretical is laughable to me. It's like a black guy going to a KKK site and complaining that "everyone is mean to me", silly. I would be more than happy to talk and learn more about anyone here, as a matter of fact I've reached out in love to mwc68 on a few different occasions with no response, so please don't think I'm here to just bash one group for no reason. Fordman asked for every bit of what he gets here, even though I admit I shouldn’t have sunk to his level.
 
Jul 4, 2015
648
6
0
And your source is the corrupted Catholic Church fordman?

Its interesting that ONLY the Catholic Church seems to have the Truth and nobody outside the Catholic Church has the Truth. Did you know fordman this is the very same thing the Cults say?

Many Cults claim only they have the Truth and no one else outside of their Church has the Truth. Which is EXACTLY the same thing you are saying fordman. So now one only has to take a step back to see what the Catholics claim is the very same thing the Cults claim.

Sounds to me fordman that the Catholic Church is a Cult today.
 
Nov 14, 2012
2,113
4
0
[SUP]How can the Catholic Church be the True Church when it teaches just the opposite of what God says?

CCC #846, and CCC #847

The Catholic Church clearly spells out in #846 that one must be in the Catholic Church to receive Salvation. In # 847 the Catholic Church clearly says those who do not know Jesus Christ can receive Salvation by their own good works.

Ephesians 2:8-9
[SUP]8 [/SUP] For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,
[SUP]9 [/SUP] not of works, lest anyone should boast.

John 3:16-18
[SUP]16 [/SUP] For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
[SUP]17 [/SUP] For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.
[SUP]18 [/SUP] He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
[/SUP]
The Catholics always oppose the Truth from God in the Scriptures. The Catholics say Salvation is received by being in the Catholic Church. God says salvation is received by Faith and Grace.

The Catholics say a person can enter into Heaven even if they do not believe in Jesus Christ. God says all those who do not believe in Jesus are condemned and cannot enter into Heaven.

So who is lying, God or the Catholics?

Seeing that it is Impossible for God to lie I would have to say its the Catholics who are lying.

Hebrews 6:18
[SUP]18 [/SUP] that by two immutable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie,

It has to be the Catholics who are lying, but why? I believe the Catholics lie because they do not have a relationship with Jesus Christ. They only have lip service to following Jesus Christ. I truly believe the Catholics have never truly accepted Jesus Christ into their Hearts. I believe they only give lip service to believing in Jesus Christ. After all even Satan believes in Jesus but yet Satan has never accepted Jesus Christ into his Heart.

I believe this is the problem with Catholics today is that they have no relationship with Jesus Christ that it is all head knowledge and not Heart driven.

Otherwise why would the Catholics teach its only by the Catholic Church a person receives Salvation if they had a True relationship with Jesus Christ?

We are told to beware false prophets in sheep's clothing.

Matthew 7:15-20
[SUP]15 [/SUP] "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.
[SUP]16 [/SUP] You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?
[SUP]17 [/SUP] Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.
[SUP]18 [/SUP] A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.
[SUP]19 [/SUP] Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
[SUP]20 [/SUP] Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

The Catholics today are false prophets trying to deceive you into following their God Mary.
The problem is all you do is assume.