Sorry, breakfast has already been served. You missed out on a large plate of biscuits and gravy, bacon, and eggs over easy.
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I had an english muffin with butter and peanut butter on it for breakfast. It would have tasted better with jam but I don't have any.. 
I had an english muffin with butter and peanut butter on it for breakfast. It would have tasted better with jam but I don't have any..
Have you tried the Jif whipped Peanut Butter yet? It's really good.
So I'm walking in mall the other day, I guess the prom is coming up because there are prom dresses on display in a lot of stores, but some of these dresses, I'm not sure what to think. I don't want to sound like an old fart but some of them show a lot of skin. Like this one
Kind of skimpy.
Kind of skimpy.
okay, so here's a question.
when a dress is flesh-colored, is it more "revealing" or "scandalous" than the same kind/style of dress in another fabrication?
this is something i'm quite curious what you guys think, since i've recently had a debate with a friend about this.
see, one thing many people don't know (mostly men) is that dresses that are more in that hue are often lined, so even though you think you're seeing someone's "flesh" they're actually seeing the nude liner, which is obscuring what is behind it.
for reference, i'm not talking about the above dress in the previous specifically, because it is pretty scant.
but what about, say a dress such as this, below?
is it more "immodest" BECAUSE of its flesh/nude coloration? because that dress below, would pretty much blend into my skin--without much line of demarcation. please note, that this dress is 100% lined, so there would be no actual skin seen, but it might APPEAR that way because of the open lace design.
just having breakfast now. c'mon over! creamed beef over red potato hashbrowns...grapefruit with honey...coffee
I had an english muffin with butter and peanut butter on it for breakfast. It would have tasted better with jam but I don't have any..
me too with breakfast now... working on a leftover, coldish carnita taco on a homemade corn tortilla.
with raspberry earl grey tea. : )
mmmmm.
I had an english muffin with butter and peanut butter on it for breakfast. It would have tasted better with jam but I don't have any..
That is unacceptable. Here you go...
dang, girl.. you're ALWAYS hungry..or thirsty.. or both..
i'm a chunky monkey
lol
i'm a chunky monkey
then quit eating that flavor of Ben and Jerry's ice cream..lol..
I know exactly what you're talking about. When I was in band our color guard uniforms looked ridiculoously low cut, I mean like down to the waist! But upon close inspection you see that's its just a flesh-colored fabric that starts at their neck. Its a good thing for them too because we had to perform in 40 degree weather. Ever try to play drums with frozen fingers?
okay, so here's a question.
when a dress is flesh-colored, is it more "revealing" or "scandalous" than the same kind/style of dress in another fabrication?
this is something i'm quite curious what you guys think, since i've recently had a debate with a friend about this.
see, one thing many people don't know (mostly men) is that dresses that are more in that hue are often lined, so even though you think you're seeing someone's "flesh" they're actually seeing the nude liner, which is obscuring what is behind it.
for reference, i'm not talking about the above dress in the previous specifically, because it is pretty scant.
but what about, say a dress such as this, below?
is it more "immodest" BECAUSE of its flesh/nude coloration? because that dress below, would pretty much blend into my skin--without much line of demarcation. please note, that this dress is 100% lined, so there would be no actual skin seen, but it might APPEAR that way because of the open lace design.
Reminds me of a quote from Steven Wright. "When I was in high school our school color was clear. We used to say, "I AM wearing clothes, I'm in the band."I know exactly what you're talking about. When I was in band our color guard uniforms looked ridiculoously low cut, I mean like down to the waist! But upon close inspection you see that's its just a flesh-colored fabric that starts at their neck. Its a good thing for them too because we had to perform in 40 degree weather. Ever try to play drums with frozen fingers?
