Is there such a thing as an atheist?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
Regardless of what else you may think of the Bible, the Bible is among other things a set of revealed constraints. It regulates how man is to represent what is right and wrong, good and evil, true or untrue. It enables us to conduct our lives in a more noble fashion. If God is acknowledged as real and the Bible as the word of God this would require a transformation of human conduct at the most basic level in the way we think, speak, and behave. If God is not real and if the Bible is not the world of God then there are no standards of right and wrong beyond what can be determined as such by the collective will of a society. Since all societies are so diverse, this would mean there is no concrete or absolute standard. Nothing essentially matters.
Of course things matter, in fact they matter a lot more. There would still be fallout and repurcussuons for our actions. The fact that non believers don't believe in an afterlife is all the more reason to make sure this life spent as best as possible and not in a jail cell or whatever
 

JimmieD

Senior Member
Apr 11, 2014
895
18
18
Plus there is a major difference between an atheist and a Christian.
Is it very rigorous to refer to a difference between such large groups of people? Inevitably, you will end up mischaracterizing things in your attempt to simplify the world.

Maybe what follows is a difference between some atheists and some Christians, but I think it's an obvious categorical mistake to make such general inferences about the entirety of such large groups. For someone who regards themselves as a paragon of using "solid evidence" and "facts" and "informed decissions", it seems a little amaterurish.

If an atheist was shown solid evidence that God was real then the atheist would start believing in God. Because that's how atheists work.
I don't know how you can possibly make a conclusion like that except based on anecdotal information.

They analyse the facts and evidence available to them to make an informed decision (well, the atheists I know anyway lol)
Yes, anecdotal information. It's not very useful.

However if a Christian was shown solid proof that God doesnt exist then the Christian would dismiss it and say it was the work of Satan or something.
They would? Based on what?

See the difference in thought processes?
The difference is pure fiction.
 
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
Is it very rigorous to refer to a difference between such large groups of people? Inevitably, you will end up mischaracterizing things in your attempt to simplify the world.

Maybe what follows is a difference between some atheists and some Christians, but I think it's an obvious categorical mistake to make such general inferences about the entirety of such large groups. For someone who regards themselves as a paragon of using "solid evidence" and "facts" and "informed decissions", it seems a little amaterurish.



I don't know how you can possibly make a conclusion like that except based on anecdotal information.



Yes, anecdotal information. It's not very useful.



They would? Based on what?



The difference is pure fiction.
What about all the Christians who "know God" and "spend time with God" or have had things revealed to them by God... Which most claim.

What would they then say is responsible for those experiences?
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
Of course things matter, in fact they matter a lot more. There would still be fallout and repurcussuons for our actions. The fact that non believers don't believe in an afterlife is all the more reason to make sure this life spent as best as possible and not in a jail cell or whatever
If there is nothing beyond this life, what difference does it make?
 
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
If there is nothing beyond this life, what difference does it make?
A lot of difference. Would you rather spend your short life with your friends, loved ones and your kids and see the world etc? Or would you rather spend it in a jail cell.
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
ColinCat said:
So it was all set up that the majority of all people will go to hell?
Jimbone said:
Yep. Scary huh?
ColinCat said:
Absolutely. Just count yourself lucky you weren't born in India.
Why? Indians can be saved too, I'm pretty sure there are a few on here.
Eighty percent of Indians follow Hinduism, according to the 2001 census. That's some 800 million people. Guess they are all going to Hell? Christians comprise only slightly more than 2% of the population of India. It's hard to fathom how an all-powerful and all-loving deity could consign so many to damnation, and all for the crime of not believing the correct things about him (sounds like something the Supreme Leader of North Korea might do). Forgive me, but this doesn't sound like a loving God.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
A lot of difference. Would you rather spend your short life with your friends, loved ones and your kids and see the world etc? Or would you rather spend it in a jail cell.
This kind of philosophical defense places the quality of human experience over and above all else. At the end of your life what possible difference would it make which one you chose?
 
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
This kind of philosophical defense places the quality of human experience over and above all else. At the end of your life what possible difference would it make which one you chose?
It sound like you have no real value on this life whatsoever and are concentrating all your efforts on the next one.
 

JimmieD

Senior Member
Apr 11, 2014
895
18
18
What about all the Christians who "know God" and "spend time with God" or have had things revealed to them by God... Which most claim.

What would they then say is responsible for those experiences?
I'm not sure what this has to do with the categorical error you made. Rather than just admitting the mistake and moving along, you're now choosing to throw out a red herring, for what reason I'm not real sure, but I surmise in hopes that you can steer me away from pointing out your mistake again.

So you were given specific evidence of a classic categorical error that you yourself made based on some scattering of anecdotal information from your own experience. Then you try to steer the subject onto something unrelated. Sure, perhaps there are Christians who would offer you anecdotal information as "proof" the same as you just did. I guess you would be in good company then. There's not much difference in your thought process and those Christians you have in mind, which further goes to undermining your previous point.

Should I take you serious when you say that you would change your mind if given good evidence when you just didn't admit to your own mistake? I mean, now there is specific evidence that you wouldn't change anything based on good reason. Once pointed out, fallacious reasoning on our part is good reason to make us reasses our position.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
It sound like you have no real value on this life whatsoever and are concentrating all your efforts on the next one.
Quite the contrary. I have a nice family with four children and seven grandchildren. I am retired and enjoy my hobbies of hunting and fishing. I do enjoy life but, human experience, whether good or bad, must be subordinate to the eternal. When I pass from this life, the quality of my experiences will have meant nothing. All that matters is the quality of life beyond. If there is not God or if one lives as if there is no God, it is all for nothing.
 
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
I'm not sure what this has to do with the categorical error you made. Rather than just admitting the mistake and moving along, you're now choosing to throw out a red herring, for what reason I'm not real sure, but I surmise in hopes that you can steer me away from pointing out your mistake again.

So you were given specific evidence of a classic categorical error that you yourself made based on some scattering of anecdotal information from your own experience. Then you try to steer the subject onto something unrelated. Sure, perhaps there are Christians who would offer you anecdotal information as "proof" the same as you just did. I guess you would be in good company then. There's not much difference in your thought process and those Christians you have in mind, which further goes to undermining your previous point.

Should I take you serious when you say that you would change your mind if given good evidence when you just didn't admit to your own mistake? I mean, now there is specific evidence that you wouldn't change anything based on good reason. Once pointed out, fallacious reasoning on our part is good reason to make us reasses our position.
Yes. It was a very general statement. I was just mentioning how believers and non believers think. I'm not saying either one is right or wrong. But believers will say that they have some sort of personal experience with God and an atheist can't say that. So its one less obstacle for an atheist to contend with if he was confronted with evidence. An atheist has much less ties to sever and much less emotional attachment to their beliefs than a Christian so I believe it would be harder for a Christian to accept evidence than an atheist.

This is my opinion and it might well be wrong. Never said i couldn't Be.
 
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
Quite the contrary. I have a nice family with four children and seven grandchildren. I am retired and enjoy my hobbies of hunting and fishing. I do enjoy life but, human experience, whether good or bad, must be subordinate to the eternal. When I pass from this life, the quality of my experiences will have meant nothing. All that matters is the quality of life beyond. If there is not God or if one lives as if there is no God, it is all for nothing.
Would you have lived your life differently if you never believed in God? As on would you still enjoy the same things and have the same things you have now?
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
Would you have lived your life differently if you never believed in God? As on would you still enjoy the same things and have the same things you have now?
I have no doubt I would have lived my life much differently. I struggle with things as all christians do and the only thing that restrains my conduct is how God has said we regards such behavior.
 
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
I have no doubt I would have lived my life much differently. I struggle with things as all christians do and the only thing that restrains my conduct is how God has said we regards such behavior.
So I have the same sort of things you do. We both seem to enjoy life. So our beliefs don't seem to have made things different for us in general.

As a Christian... Do you believe that I live a reasonable moral life because God instilled that behaviour in me, regardless of my belief?
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
So I have the same sort of things you do. We both seem to enjoy life. So our beliefs don't seem to have made things different for us in general.

As a Christian... Do you believe that I live a reasonable moral life because God instilled that behaviour in me, regardless of my belief?
No, I believe you behave the way you do, as most people do, because people are largely are the product of their social environment. From our earliest childhood certain behaviors are instilled in us by our parents and those closest to us. As we mature our behavior begins to be influenced by wider and wider circles of social influences, church, school, neighbors, television, books, etc.... We make choices about how we will respond to restrictions placed upon us by society. Some people's behavior is restrained out of a sense of fear for consequences. Others, those we regard as the more noble of society, are constrained out of a sense of honor and integrity. All of this is nothing more than the impact of socialization on the individual.
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
You seem to be under the impression that atheists don't want God to exist.
Or they think he exists but pretends he doesn't.

That's not my stance at all.
So what is your answer to my previous inquiry:

If you are convinced he exists, will you submit to and obey him ?
 
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
So what is your answer to my previous inquiry:

If you are convinced he exists, will you submit to and obey him ?
Let's get to the belief first. I can't just jump in and say I would submit and obey lol
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,144
614
113
70
Alabama
As a Christian... Do you believe that I live a reasonable moral life because God instilled that behaviour in me, regardless of my belief?
I think what you are really asking is, where does man derive his sense of right and wrong, or who has the right the determine what is right or wrong? Would this be a fair assessment of you question?
 

Elin

Banned
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
Yes. It was a very general statement. I was just mentioning how believers and non believers think. I'm not saying either one is right or wrong. But believers will say that they have some sort of personal experience with God and an atheist can't say that. So its one less obstacle for an atheist to contend with if he was confronted with evidence. An atheist has much less ties to sever and much less emotional attachment to their beliefs than a Christian so I believe
it would be harder for a Christian to accept evidence than an atheist.

This is my opinion and it might well be wrong. Never said i couldn't Be.
It ain't about evidence.

If you were convinced that God exists, would you submit to and obey him?


That's what it's about.
 
Sep 14, 2014
966
2
0
I think what you are really asking is, where does man derive his sense of right and wrong, or who has the right the determine what is right or wrong? Would this be a fair assessment of you question?
Sort of. I believe similar to you that we are products of our environment.