Then the answer is simple. You will forever and always be lost. Been down that road many times with you and you still refuse to study it in whole. No thanks. Once in a rut, always in a rut. It will take a miracle to deviate from that. You let me know when you are serious enough to put your beliefs aside and try new things openly although I doubt that will happen.I have considered your beliefs and found them lacking. That is why I do not drink your Kool Aide. I doubt very seriously that you once believed as I do. I used to think the Rapture was real when I was younger. Then I read the Bible and couldn't find one rapture teaching. I see the Lord returning and gathering His remnant, those who survived the Tribulation, but no Rapture.
In my studies I saw that the Great Multitude in Heaven who came out of the Great Tribulation are indeed slaughtered Christians who fell for Satan's lie. I am not aware of anyone who teaches this or anyone before me who see this for what it is. I posted this idea on another site and it went viral. I am not taking credit for it as God deserves any credit due. The point is, the Rapture doctrine is harmful, it will cost untold millions their lives and great embarrassment in heaven. I am on a mission to do as much harm to the Rapture lie as I can. It is my spiritual calling, so to speak.
What is the main point you feel I have not considered regarding your views? Let's discuss it, the main point only. I want to see what it is exactly that has you are riled up.
Likewise Friend. Email me if you want. Let's respect GRA's wishes to keep this thread on topic.Then the answer is simple. You will forever and always be lost. Been down that road many times with you and you still refuse to study it in whole. No thanks. Once in a rut, always in a rut. It will take a miracle to deviate from that. You let me know when you are serious enough to put your beliefs aside and try new things openly although I doubt that will happen.
Just make sure you understand me correctly. I have changed many times because I was told I was wrong. I listened very carefully to why they said so, studied it WITHOUT trying to force MY beliefs on top of theirs.Likewise Friend. Email me if you want. Let's respect GRA's wishes to keep this thread on topic.
I agree with the thrust of your post but unsure what it is that you think I have so wrong??Just make sure you understand me correctly. I have changed many times because I was told I was wrong. I listened very carefully to why they said so, studied it WITHOUT trying to force MY beliefs on top of theirs.
This is VERY IMPORTANT!!!! I will NEVER understand what the messenger is talking about IF I keep clouding HIS issues with mine. I want to know WHY he said so and so. I want to know where he got it, why he got it and I want it backed up where there is no question about it. However, sometimes (like most all the time) you just have to accept something while not really understanding it at first. You need to assume this is correct and test it to see where it leads you. That is the most toughest thing to do. If it doesn't fit right away, it must be wrong. Not necessarily. What you think is wrong just might be very right and you will never see it because you trash canned it because it didn't fit what you think it should be. If it is correct, that means you need to redo everything around it and people just don't like to do that! Extra work, you know.
Can you tell what a 1,000 piece picture puzzle will look like with just 50 pieces? You don't even have the box top to see what the finished product will look like. It will be hard pressed to tell me what it is. You must build it up piece by piece. Trial and error. Take chances and try new possibilities.
Has anyone here ever tried using years instead of days? Why not? How do you know it won't work if you never tried it yet? God's plan takes a long time to develop and the things Jesus has said in this thread, Matt 24, (that is if you believe none or not much of the stuff written in Matt 24 hasn't happened yet) is 2,000 years old by now and we're still waiting on it. Are you (this is for the one's waiting for the 7 years to commence) that no prophecies occurred between Jesus and now? Prophecy was getting fulfilled right under our noses and yet we never see them even if it is in plain sight! Why? Because we choose not to look for them. Sad, but true.
I really appreciate seeing someone write this...Just make sure you understand me correctly. I have changed many times because I was told I was wrong. I listened very carefully to why they said so, studied it WITHOUT trying to force MY beliefs on top of theirs. {}
This is VERY IMPORTANT!!!! I will NEVER understand what the messenger is talking about IF I keep clouding HIS issues with mine. I want to know WHY he said so and so. I want to know where he got it, why he got it and I want it backed up where there is no question about it. However, sometimes (like most all the time) you just have to accept something while not really understanding it at first. You need to assume this is correct and test it to see where it leads you. That is the most toughest thing to do. If it doesn't fit right away, it must be wrong. Not necessarily. What you think is wrong just might be very right and you will never see it because you trash canned it because it didn't fit what you think it should be. If it is correct, that means you need to redo everything around it and people just don't like to do that! Extra work, you know.
Can you tell what a 1,000 piece picture puzzle will look like with just 50 pieces? You don't even have the box top to see what the finished product will look like. It will be hard pressed to tell me what it is. You must build it up piece by piece. Trial and error. Take chances and try new possibilities.
Has anyone here ever tried using years instead of days? Why not? How do you know it won't work if you never tried it yet? God's plan takes a long time to develop and the things Jesus has said in this thread, Matt 24, (that is if you believe none or not much of the stuff written in Matt 24 hasn't happened yet) is 2,000 years old by now and we're still waiting on it. Are you (this is for the one's waiting for the 7 years to commence) that no prophecies occurred between Jesus and now? Prophecy was getting fulfilled right under our noses and yet we never see them even if it is in plain sight! Why? Because we choose not to look for them. Sad, but true.
With all of the "extremist" debate that goes on around here between those who believe "all end-times prophesy is past" and those who believe "all end-times prophesy is future" ----- I have been trying to get them all to see that the truth actually lies "somewhere between" these 'extremes'.
This is the exact problem we have. YOU THINK you will have a 1,000 year period. Is that what God wants or is it what you want? If you apply a little more study on this, you too will discover that this can never happen. Build your puzzle one piece at a time. The Bible is so clear to me at this current time. I don't know anything that will happen next year because we aren't there yet. I don't even know if we have a year left!I agree with the thrust of your post but unsure what it is that you think I have so wrong??
I know 1,000 years on earth is as a day to the Lord. I get that. Peter teaches us this. To me this means the 1,000 years of Christ's reign on earth lasts just one day in heaven.
Hey!! No problem! I have no intention to change the coarse of this thread.I really appreciate seeing someone write this...
My initial idea for all three of my 'study' threads was to "present the study" in a step-by-step explanatory method - how I arrived at the conclusions that I had in these studies. Until I could find / make the time to do so - I thought it might be useful to let everyone view the 'charts' that I had made for each -- so that people could have a "pre-view"...
Well -- between not seeming to be able to do such -- and, because people did not seem to REALLY be interested in trying to understand it from my perspective -- I got very discouraged, and essentially "gave up on it"... ( the "present the study" part )
It has become very difficult to convince myself that I should spend so much time and energy - that I don't really have that much of - trying to explain . . . if all they want to do is "trash-talk" it...
I believe that the 'seals' have "unfolded slowly" over the past ~2000 years even to this time and continuing until the Second Coming of Christ.
I believe that the 'trumpets' will "unfold" in a considerally shorter period of time - no less than 3.5 years, but could be a bit longer.
I believe that the 'vials' will "unfold" in a very short period of time - hours to days - at the Second Coming of Christ.
![]()
I believe that the 'seals' have "unfolded slowly" over the past ~2000 years even to this time and continuing until the Second Coming of Christ.
I believe that the 'trumpets' will "unfold" in a considerally shorter period of time - no less than 3.5 years, but could be a bit longer.
I believe that the 'vials' will "unfold" in a very short period of time - hours to days - at the Second Coming of Christ.
No, this is what God says!!! Rev 20. Read it. Learn it. Live it. Love it.This is the exact problem we have. YOU THINK you will have a 1,000 year period. Is that what God wants or is it what you want?
The first "clue" is that verse 1 is written in the present tense -- it is literal and actual -- during the revelation experience of John.Really? Can you explain Rev 11 given the context of there being the two witnesses there if there is to be no new temple?
1 Then I was given a reed like a measuring rod. And the angel stood, saying, "Rise and measure the temple of God, the altar, and those who worship there. 2 But leave out the court which is outside the temple, and do not measure it, for it has been given to the Gentiles. And they will tread the holy city underfoot for forty-two months. 3 And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy one thousand two hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth."
The first "clue" is that verse 1 is written in the present tense -- it is literal and actual -- during the revelation experience of John.
John recorded that he was given a reed... ( i.e., "it was actually handed to him" )
What temple was he instructed to measure at that time?
At the word 'and' in verse 2, the time "focus" changes from present to future. ( from John's point of view )
![]()
I believe the actual conversation being had was - to John - in the present - at the time... Don't you?Is John seeing a vision or was he actually taken to heaven? John tells us in Rev 1 that he was in the Spirit:
10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,
Now look ahead to Rev 4 after the messages to the 7 churches:
1 After this I looked , and, behold , a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said , Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter.
Note that John is actually in Spirit in heaven seeing things which must be hereafter. I take this to mean everything from this point forward is future to John. We know John wrote Revelation from Patmos and most scholars put the time around AD 95, which is a good 25 years after the destruction of the 2nd temple. Thus John was in the future measuring a future temple. In fact almost everything John saw from this point forward was future. Don't you agree?
But hey, I'm not willing to die on there being a future temple "hill." I am open to the Lord returning to Mount Zion. It is a very Holy Place and we know He stands there with the 144K. We also know He splits the Mount of Olives and goes through the sealed East Gate of Jerusalem that leads straight to the Temple Mount too.
No, the temple was not in heaven, I think it will be in earth because Gentiles aren't going to be walking around outside in heaven for 42 months. Consider also that when Christ returns he enters through the Eastern Gate of the Temple Mount. This gate his been sealed for 2,000 years. If there is no temple on the Temple Mount, why go there? It is full of Muslims and the Dome of the Rock.If I tell you about something that is going to happen next week - I am speaking of the future.
If I hand you a ruler and tell you to measure something - I am speaking of the present.
Whatever temple John was told to measure -- it had to exist at that time - somewhere - earth, heaven, or "being shown to John in the vision"...
I seriously doubt it was heaven - verse 2 does away with that.
![]()
Revelation 1:gra,i have read much of what you have posted here and in your other post(a curiosity of the same subject on my part,so i find other ideas helpful),,,its my manner of thinking from rev.1;19,,,so for instance lets say (ad96,i know there's a lot of debate on the correct date of writing,but just for an example)
so using ad 96,,,,Christ said to john,,,
(1)things thou hast seen(past tense to john while he was alive in ad96)
(2)the things which are(present tense to john while he was alive in ad 96)
(3)things which shall be hereafter(future tense to john while he was alive in ad96)
now to me it wouldn't make sense to think that (1)things that thou hast seen to be in reference to "the vision he was seeing of Revelation" because he(Christ) uses the term "hast seen" in the same paragraph in connection with the two other "time frames present and future",,so it seems clear that in this verse he is referring to the past tense in aspect to the life time of john when he states "thou hast seen".
so to me past Christ establishing this to john he then is directing him to write "three sets of things he is about to give him in the Revelation. ,,,,
so the three in aspect to john while alive on patmos would be,,,one set of things he is instructed to write that had already taken place some where for the creation up to that exact point in time,two the things that were taking place in the history of the world at the exact time the Revelation was being given to john,and then the third set of things being given to him(john) that were future tense from the Revelation being given to him in ad96.
i do apologize for asking you here in this thread,i was following the last few post between you and the others in one of the threads you have started you may have already discussed his and i may have missed it if you could direct me to it? to it seems clear by the statement in rev. 1;19 that in or around ad96 one third of the Revelation had already taken place,one third of the Revelation was taking place when this was given to john,which would only leave "one third of the Revelation to still be fulfilled between the Revelation of Christ till the (end?)
i realize that most believe to account for the events described in the Revelation given through John from the time given until now but it as i say seems clear that according to Christ comment that, that would be contrary to the comment made by Christ to john in rev.1;19 ,,,i do apologize again if i am asking this off comment,,,