Is There A God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
p_rehbein

p_rehbein

Senior Member
#1
Sep 4, 2013
30,670
6,860
113
#1
Well, you tell me............. :)

today 008.JPG
 
Kreation

Kreation

Senior Member
#2
Sep 19, 2013
169
4
0
#2
Yes!!! you think like me! I always make myself look up from the ugly human creation ( skyscrapers, cars, concrete) to God's original creation, and believe me, I never get disappointed :)
 
p_rehbein

p_rehbein

Senior Member
#3
Sep 4, 2013
30,670
6,860
113
#3
I love these flowers..........because I see angels in each bloom.........(yes, I know, they aren't really angles....)

dec flowers 006.JPG
 
F

freakyforGOD

Guest
#4
#4
YES there one and only GOD
 
TheKringledOne

TheKringledOne

Senior Member
#6
Dec 25, 2009
423
4
18
#6
Pictures of pretty things don't prove a god. I could post pictures of ugly things; would that be evidence against God?

I can find pictures of hyenas eating out of the butts of elephants... what does that say about God?
 
Last edited:
pickles

pickles

Senior Member
#7
Apr 20, 2009
14,479
182
63
#7
I would say instead?
Prove to me there is'nt a God.

For me there is and always will be! :)

Beautiful photos! :)

In Jesus, God bless
pickles
 
N

nw2u

Guest
#8
#8
It proves that even the ugliest, most disgusting, hateful, evil things have a purpose.
 
TheKringledOne

TheKringledOne

Senior Member
#9
Dec 25, 2009
423
4
18
#9
I'll just go ahead and say that there seems to be a severe lack of evidence.
 
J

jb

Senior Member
#10
Feb 27, 2010
4,940
591
113
#10
Rom 1v20: For ever since the creation of the world His invisible nature and attributes, that is, His eternal power and divinity, have been made intelligible and clearly discernible in and through the things that have been made (His handiworks). So [men] are without excuse [altogether without any defense or justification]...(AMP)
 
TheKringledOne

TheKringledOne

Senior Member
#11
Dec 25, 2009
423
4
18
#11
That is neat. If only it was actually the case.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#12
#12
nw2u said:
It proves that even the ugliest, most disgusting, hateful, evil things have a purpose.
Click to expand...
More evidence that what which was once a paradise has been cursed by sin because of mankind's rebellion against its Creator God.
 
p_rehbein

p_rehbein

Senior Member
#13
Sep 4, 2013
30,670
6,860
113
#13
TheKringledOne said:
Pictures of pretty things don't prove a god. I could post pictures of ugly things; would that be evidence against God?

I can find pictures of hyenas eating out of the butts of elephants... what does that say about God?
Click to expand...
and, for those who don't believe in God, the hyenas would be their ancestors yes? Or the elephants..........there's something to aspire to eh? :)
 
p_rehbein

p_rehbein

Senior Member
#14
Sep 4, 2013
30,670
6,860
113
#14
...............by any other name is still a............

november 3rd 007.JPG
 
TheKringledOne

TheKringledOne

Senior Member
#15
Dec 25, 2009
423
4
18
#15
p_rehbein said:
and, for those who don't believe in God, the hyenas would be their ancestors yes? Or the elephants..........there's something to aspire to eh? :)
Click to expand...
None of what you said makes any sense.
 
AvalonXQ

AvalonXQ

Banned
#17
Sep 6, 2013
266
3
0
#17
p_rehbein said:
and, for those who don't believe in God, the hyenas would be their ancestors yes? Or the elephants..........there's something to aspire to eh? :)
Click to expand...
Nope, neither hyenas nor elephants are ancestral to human beings. Our common ancestor with both would have been pretty much rodent like, if I understand correctly.
 
p_rehbein

p_rehbein

Senior Member
#18
Sep 4, 2013
30,670
6,860
113
#18
AvalonXQ said:
Nope, neither hyenas nor elephants are ancestral to human beings. Our common ancestor with both would have been pretty much rodent like, if I understand correctly.
Click to expand...
yeah, it was a tongue in cheek comment to one who denies God......... :) I am aware of the false theory of evolution.......just thought a hyena would serve to symbolize those who deny God. Although, on reflection, it may not be fair to hyenas...... :)
 
TheKringledOne

TheKringledOne

Senior Member
#19
Dec 25, 2009
423
4
18
#19
AvalonXQ said:
Nope, neither hyenas nor elephants are ancestral to human beings. Our common ancestor with both would have been pretty much rodent like, if I understand correctly.
Click to expand...
More of a shrew like animal; as the majority of shrews are much more basal. Rodents are far too specialized.

p_rehbein said:
Well, I was just following your lead there............... :)
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure what I said was at the very least coherent. nw2u and Tintin were sufficient rebuttal, but not without its own consequences. It is a Christian site so I won't go into it in detail. Just wanted to say that pretty stuff appearing in nature doesn't hint at the existence of a god, much less a specific one; just like pictures of disgusting things do not point towards the idea of a god not existing.
 
AvalonXQ

AvalonXQ

Banned
#20
Sep 6, 2013
266
3
0
#20
TheKringledOne said:
More of a shrew like animal; as the majority of shrews are much more basal. Rodents are far too specialized.
Click to expand...
Demonstrates the limits of my knowledge, as I could not have told you there was any difference between "shrew-like" and "rodent-like". Thanks for the clarification.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.