Churches that Don't Allow Tongues and Prophecy in Meetings disobey Bible

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
since they dont seem to want to obey and submit to testing (which Paul didnt have a problem with), too bad.
Show me where you have authority to demand people to go search prophecies for you so you can test them. If you despise prophesyings from the get go, how are you going to test them?
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
Acts 2:17
16but this is what was spoken of through the prophet Joel: "'In the last days, God says, I will pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your young men will see visions, your old men will dream dreams.

this happened, according to the promise; given to israel; at Pentecost. peter confirmed it.
you deny that.
You need to read the rest of the passage.

Acts 2:39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off--for all whom the Lord our God will call."

(NIV)(emphasis mine)

and how should we interpret this concerning the Gentiles:

Acts 10
[SUP]15 [/SUP]“As I began to speak, the Holy Spirit came on them as he had come on us at the beginning. [SUP]16 [/SUP]Then I remembered what the Lord had said: ‘John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.’ [SUP]17 [/SUP]So if God gave them the same gift he gave us who believed in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I to think that I could stand in God’s way?”

(NIV)

Don't blame me. I don't write them. I just quote them.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
I would not say that 'perfection' or the completion here means exactly 'complete knowledge.' That's part of it. But the completion to come also replaces prophesying 'in part.'

It is not, grammatically, referring to Jesus. I believe that the completeness will come either when Jesus comes back or some time later (perhaps when Christ delivers up the kingdom to God.)

The problem with your viewpoint is Paul's statement that when he was a child, he spoke as a child, he thought as a child, and he understood as a child. But when he became a man, he put away childish things. He is comparing what his knowledge will be like before completion comes to what it will be like after.

1. He is comparing HIS OWN KNOWLEDGE. Paul was asleep in Christ when John stopped writing. And supposing you want to interpret loosely and take Paul out of the equation.
2. Having the Bible does not make your knowledge superior to Paul's.
3. Having the Bible does not make your knowledge so superior to Paul's that he is like a child compared to you.
i'm going to turn this back on you - LET'S FIND AN APOSTLE WHO IS EQUAL TO PAUL OR PETER TODAY.
forget partial or superior.

EQUAL....name ONE.

having the Bible doesn't make ME superior to paul:rolleyes: - it makes COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE/REVELATION (which GOD GAVE in ALL OF SCRIPTURE) superior to PARTIAL.

you can read the WHOLE thing today. if you started studying as a kid and never stopped, you'd know everything Paul is recorded to have known AND THEN SOME. because you have everything all in one place - including the visions of New Jerusalem John saw, by which time the others had died or been killed. so did THEY live to see the COMPLETE COME?

NO.

Peter got the vision of the unclean animals. did he know what that meant before he found out?

did Peter live to find out the vision John got?
how about John the Baptist?
did he even live to see anything the Apostles did?
and yet he was Jesus' cousin and the forerunner.
he had to send his own disciples to ask: Are You the Messiah or should we KEEP LOOKING FOR ANOTHER!
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
Why do you attempt to confuse apostolic gifts with the charismatic gifts? Shame on you.
The conversion of 3000 on the day of Pentecost is not attributed to the evidence of tongues but to the preaching of Gods word by Peter. How is it that you overlook the heart of the matter? Men are converted by the hearing of Gods word. Rom 10:17
I agree with you that the men on the day of Pentecost were fake, but if you maintain that tongues were fake, then how can you hold that Acts 2 is telling the truth?

When Paul says that he 'speaks with tongues more than ye all' in the context of discussing a spiritual gift, do you think he wasn't talking about a spiritual gift of tongues?

And why wouldn't the gifts of the apostles be charismata also? Don't they come from grace? Paul said he outlabored the other apostles, yet not he, but the grace that was with him. Don't you think God's grace (charis) worked through Paul when he did what you called 'apostolic gifts.' If so, then why would they not be charismata?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
You need to read the rest of the passage.

Acts 2:39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off--for all whom the Lord our God will call."
Acts 2
37Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” 38And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 39For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” 40And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” 41So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.

Repent
and be baptized
every one of you
in the name of Jesus Christ
for the forgiveness of your sins
and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

what was the Promise?
tongues?

OR: the forgiveness of your sins, the gift of the Holy Spirit.

does it says GIFTS?
or the GIFT of the Holy Spirit?

were they then baptized in WATER?

ya? no?

Ephesians 1
Spiritual Blessings in Christ

3Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, 4even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love 5he predestined usb for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will, 6to the praise of his glorious grace, with which he has blessed us in the Beloved. 7In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of his grace, 8which he lavished upon us, in all wisdom and insight 9making known to us the mystery of his will, according to his purpose, which he set forth in Christ 10as a plan for the fullness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth.

11In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will, 12so that we who were the first to hope in Christ might be to the praise of his glory. 13In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit, 14who is the guarantee of our inheritance until we acquire possession of it,e to the praise of his glory.

anything in there about them all becoming apostles or prophets or speaking in tongues?
no - paul clearly said WE WHO WERE FIRST TO HOPE....then THEY ALSO, when they HEARD the....what? gibbering? OR THE GOSPEL.

or is he saying they received forgiveness of sins and the Comforter, the down payment on God's purchased possession?

THE NEW COVENANT WAS THE PROMISE.
WITH THE LIVING HOLY SPIRIT AS THE GIFT.

nothing there about tongues or prophecy dude.
 
Last edited:

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
If one thousand trillion "christians" down through history didn't believe in the gifts or show fruit of it, & if one thousand trillion "christians" abuse them or turn it into a circus, GOD'S WORD IS STILL TRUE & CHANGES NOT.
Romans 3:3-4 (KJV) 3 For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? 4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.
you quote israelites refusing to believe Jesus was the Messiah and come into the New Covenant as proof you got da gifs?

if one thousand trillion "christians" today manifest stuff claiming they have the gifts fake it, & if one thousand trillion "christians" keep lying to themselves and others, and and make the joy of the simple Gospel of salvation into a circus, GOD'S WORD IS STILL TRUE & CHANGES NOT.

2 Corinthians 11:13
Paul and the False Apostles

12But what I am doing I will continue to do, so that I may cut off opportunity from those who desire an opportunity to be regarded just as we are in the matter about which they are boasting. 13For such men are false apostles, deceitful workers, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. 14No wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.

you didn't see Jesus, you weren't called as a special apostle (EYEWITNESS), you ain't a prophet, and tongues wasn't dscbkkueqeqkzklkxLKDHEDS.

deal with it.


you planning to correct your false teaching that they were not especially above all eyewitnesses of His Resurrection?
hence: YOU ARE MY WITNESSES - duh.
doubt it.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
What is it about the book of Revelation that makes Paul's doctrines seem childish by comparison?
okay. you're deliberately being obtuse.

moving on. do what you like.

sign up today to be part of the Five-Fold Ministry.
your dogmatic error will make you a perfect candidate.

good luck on your NEW house.
your foundation is some other house.

some other gospel coming from it, too.
'parently the one we got from HIS WITNESSES ain't good enuff.

bye then
 
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
Why don't we turn the focus back on the passage of scripture? How would Paul's immediate audience know and do these things? The speakers in tongues spoke mysteries that others could not understand. Yet Paul's instructions allowed for him to speak and for one to interpret. If all those concerns you raised are supposed to stop the gifts from functioning, how was the church supposed to deal with these issues? If these concerns are supposed to cripple people and keep them from obeying the passage, why doesn't Paul raise these concerns?

The Bible says to 'let all things be done unto edifying.' If you don't know the tongue, you can't say 'amen' to it. But that doesn't mean you don't allow it, because it is written 'forbid not to speak with tongues.' The church may be able to tell if the interpretation is edifying.




Maybe, but what do you base this one?

Where does testing not allow it? When John says to test the spirits is that not to verify the spirit behind it?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
Show me where you have authority to demand people to go search prophecies for you so you can test them. If you despise prophesyings from the get go, how are you going to test them?
that post didn't say go get prophecies.
i find them e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-everywhere.
just asking you prophets to be subject to the prophets and tell us who is fake and who ain't.

you already endorse the fake repeatedly. so i can't trust your discernment.

so (hence) perhaps one day i will go to such a place and speak gibbering nonsense and wait to see what happens.
unlike you all, i'll record it.

if it's the real deal - i'll be the first to say so.
either way, testing is commanded. like it or lump it.
 

ForthAngel

Senior Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,171
91
48
Just an example of modern day prophecy. Is this what we are to allow today? Words of knowledge?

[video=youtube;E357PL-TJK4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E357PL-TJK4[/video]
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
you already endorse the fake repeatedly. so i can't trust your discernment.
I don't think I've endorsed a single person the whole time I've been on this forum. Maybe you have your posters mixed up.

You've endorsed a lot of ideas that contradict scripture, sometimes in the name of a doctrine about scripture.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
Sorry, lost my train of thought while posting something in a previous post to notuptotme. Someone was asking me something in 'real life' while I was posting.

I meant to write something along these lines.

"I do not agree with you that the speaking in tongues on the day of Pentecost was fake, but if you maintain that tongues were fake, then how can you hold that Acts 2 is telling the truth?"

Of course, I don't agree with notuptome that speaking in tongues is fake, and I believe that the apostles spoke in tongues genuinely, and that many people do so today.
 
Last edited:

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
What is it about the book of Revelation that makes Paul's doctrines seem childish by comparison?
okay. you're deliberately being obtuse.
moving on. do what you like.
No I am not, but whether your being obtuse is deliberate or not I am not sure.

This is the clear conclusion to be drawn by your interpretation.

Do you skip over verse 11 when you read the passage?

[SUP]11 [/SUP]When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
 
Dec 26, 2012
5,853
137
0
No I am not, but whether your being obtuse is deliberate or not I am not sure.

This is the clear conclusion to be drawn by your interpretation.

Do you skip over verse 11 when you read the passage?

[SUP]11 [/SUP]When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
UMMM Do you understand that 1 Corinthians is one very long rebuke?

Why should First Corinthians contain more teaching on tongues than any other book of the Bible? The answer is simple: The Church of Corinth was a very confused church. This Church 1) had divisions among themselves based on personalities (I Corinthians 1:10-13, 3:1-11), 2) they were mixed up on, of all things, the resurrection (I Corinthians 15), 3) they were taking each other to court (I Corinthians 6:1-8), 4) they tolerated immorality (I Corinthians 5:1-13, 6:15-20), 5) they were confused about marriage and divorce (I Corinthians 5:1-13, 6:15-20), 6) they were mixed up about Christian liberty (I Corinthians 8), 7) they did not understand their responsibilities concerning the Great Commission (I Corinthians 9:1-14), 8) they had idolatry (I Corinthians 10:7, 14-22), 9) they had insubordinate man and women (I Corinthians 11:3-15, 14:34-35), 10) they were sinning at the Lord’s Supper (I Corinthians 11:20-34), and 11) they were confused concerning spiritual gifts in general (I Corinthians 12), and tongues in particular (I Corinthians 14). The Church of Corinth was really messed up, and almost all of Paul’s first letter to them was rebuking them for their various errors. They were in so much error on spiritual gifts that Paul wrote three whole chapters to try to straighten them out especially on tongues (I Corinthians 12-14).


New Testament Tongues Versus The Modern Tongues Movement
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,160
1,787
113
UMMM Do you understand that 1 Corinthians is one very long rebuke?

Why should First Corinthians contain more teaching on tongues than any other book of the Bible? The answer is simple: The Church of Corinth was a very confused church. This Church 1) had divisions among themselves based on personalities (I Corinthians 1:10-13, 3:1-11), 2) they were mixed up on, of all things, the resurrection (I Corinthians 15), 3) they were taking each other to court (I Corinthians 6:1-8), 4) they tolerated immorality (I Corinthians 5:1-13, 6:15-20), 5) they were confused about marriage and divorce (I Corinthians 5:1-13, 6:15-20), 6) they were mixed up about Christian liberty (I Corinthians 8), 7) they did not understand their responsibilities concerning the Great Commission (I Corinthians 9:1-14), 8) they had idolatry (I Corinthians 10:7, 14-22), 9) they had insubordinate man and women (I Corinthians 11:3-15, 14:34-35), 10) they were sinning at the Lord’s Supper (I Corinthians 11:20-34), and 11) they were confused concerning spiritual gifts in general (I Corinthians 12), and tongues in particular (I Corinthians 14). The Church of Corinth was really messed up, and almost all of Paul’s first letter to them was rebuking them for their various errors. They were in so much error on spiritual gifts that Paul wrote three whole chapters to try to straighten them out especially on tongues (I Corinthians 12-14).


New Testament Tongues Versus The Modern Tongues Movement

The Corinthians had their faults, but the epistle is still profitable for doctrine. It has some of the most in-depth passages that instruct us in regard to what to do in our church gatherings, both in terms of the Lord's Supper and spiritual gifts.

It is sad, though, that the Corinthians were so immature, yet they knew of and experienced spiritual things many churches today have little knowledge or experience of.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
I don't think I've endorsed a single person the whole time I've been on this forum. Maybe you have your posters mixed up.
maybe i do.

could you please name a prophet or apostle alive today or back through time (not the Biblical ones) that you endorse?
if you don't know of any - how can that be when there are millions of them, and you claim they exist?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
It is sad, though, that the Corinthians were so immature, yet they knew of and experienced spiritual things many churches today have little knowledge or experience of.
they knew of and experienced spiritual things no churches today have knowledge or experience of...except by reading about it.
'parently that's not good enough - we want da gifs.

but the gifts ceased - BY THE WILL OF GOD.
just as they were intended to.