The Sin Of Sodom
Sermon By Bryan Denlinger
[video=youtube;Tuiek4YsZqY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tuiek4YsZqY[/video]
Sermon By Bryan Denlinger
[video=youtube;Tuiek4YsZqY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tuiek4YsZqY[/video]
I was actually glad to see that you posted something not about the KJV. Then I see that it is another video and this one is over an hour long.
My hope was suddenly dashed to pieces.
View attachment 57042
Maybe next time..maybe next time..
Chosen you go too far in your posts sometimes, I have seen Danschanse's Posts and Danschance does indeed follow sound doctrine. You make the mistake of thinking you know Danschanse when you don't, All I ever see you do is post about how right you are about the KJV issue and anyone who does not agree with you is wrong no matter what. Who are you to accuse someone of not following sound doctrine? Do you know any ones Heart? And more importantly can you look inside yourself and know for a fact you yourself follow sound doctrine?Danschance, I post on several subjects.
Now of course the Bible Version Issue is one of the most important issues that Christians need to deal with today. And that is why I discuss it a lot. Since it is an issue over the pure words of God Almighty.
And in regard to your comment Danschance, you are actually a fulfillment of Bible prophecy:
3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. - 2 Timothy 4:3-4 (Holy Bible)
That scripture of the pure word of God Almighty did not mean people will not sit through hour long sermons...3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine;
an hour and 8 min? Can you just give us the jist?
Danschance, I post on several subjects.
Now of course the Bible Version Issue is one of the most important issues that Christians need to deal with today. And that is why I discuss it a lot. Since it is an issue over the pure words of God Almighty.
And in regard to your comment Danschance, you are actually a fulfillment of Bible prophecy:
3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. - 2 Timothy 4:3-4 (Holy Bible)
UMM Chosen,
It would be nice if those of you who only look at the one thing and not the whole reason why God destroyed Sodom
Ezekiel 16 KJV
49 Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.
50 And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.
Please don't leave out what God said was the WHOLE reason why. And please remember you keep saying this is the only inspired translation of the Bible,so why do you leave out the whole reason why God destroyed them? God is speaking to Ezekiel and those are His words.





Hi there Sarah,
Well I am definitely of the understanding that pride was part of their sin and iniquity. In fact, today at these abominable sodomite pride parades, it is "pride" that is always the core theme. You know why? Because they have exalted themselves in rebellion against God Almighty. They are proud of their sin and wickedness.
But also I agree with you that we should look at the whole counsel of God on any matter, comparing Scripture with Scripture. Now I do believe that the Scripture (Ezekiel 16) that you referenced was read in the video sermon. Bryan Denlinger covered a lot of Scripture in this sermon of his. And again, I do believe that one you mentioned was referenced in the video also.
And add to that many redefine what we are told in the account of Sodom. There is no way by definition that men with angels is a homosexual act. It is an act of strange flesh,attempted sexual assault,possibly murder but by definition it is not a homosexual act.
That does NOT mean that God did not tell that the acts are wrong and a sin.
Well again Sarah, consider what I mentioned earlier about angels. Every angel mentioned in the Scriptures is a man.
There is a myth that has been taught for a while about angels and it is the myth that angels are asexual. When we study what the Scriptures teach about angels, we see the total opposite. Angels in the Scriptures actually were able to have sexual relations. We know this because of the Days opf Noah. When the sons of God, an Old Testament term for "Angels." And these sons of God (angels) left their first estate and came down to the earth to lay with the women because they saw that they were fair:
6 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3 And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6 And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. - Genesis 6:1-6 (Holy Bible)Now also remember Sarah that the term Sodomy can also be applied to bestiality. So I think that the term "strange flesh" could possibly also be referring to bestiality in addition to the sin of Sodomy. And I do see your argument about strange flesh regarding men with angels, but again the sin would still be Sodomy because angels are men. Angels can have sexual relations.That has been established already because of the historical account given in Genesis 6.
Therefore, because angels are able to have sexual relations, the very act of angels being with men would be an act of Sodomy.
And of course, what also has been established already is that the very sin that was going on in the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah was the sin of Sodomy.
And again; in the city of Sodom, the other iniquities that were prevalent there were those listed in Ezekiel 16:49.
And add to that many redefine what we are told in the account of Sodom. There is no way by definition that men with angels is a homosexual act. It is an act of strange flesh,attempted sexual assault,possibly murder but by definition it is not a homosexual act.
That does NOT mean that God did not tell that the acts are wrong and a sin.
Chosen,
Taking it a bit further if they destroyed only for the acts of homosexuality do you then not have the women being destroyed because of what the men did? Where were the women during that time? Were they part of the group of men that came to Lot's house? Doesn't that mean then that God destroyed the women for someones else's sins? Does that make any sense at all and is that even Biblical?
UMMM Chosen,
A lot of women do not do sodomy so if the sin was Sodomy alone why were the women destroyed if it was because of Sodomy alone? Again Jude does NOT say it was Sodomy alone.
Now of course the Bible Version Issue is one of the most important issues that Christians need to deal with today. And that is why I discuss it a lot.