KJV Issue #4 - Inspiration and Preservation
By Pastor Richard Sowell

KJV Issue #4 - Inspiration and Preservation - SermonAudio.com
By Pastor Richard Sowell

KJV Issue #4 - Inspiration and Preservation - SermonAudio.com

I recommend listening to the whole sermon series.
And in regard to the 1769 Edition of the King James Bible, one of the main factors for this edition was to standardize the spelling of words in the Authorized Version.
The spelling of English words did not begin to take a stable form until the 18th century. Hence, the 1769 edition of the Authorzed Version with the standardized spelling was published.
And as far as your last comment is concerned. There is no heresy being taught.
I recommend listening to the whole sermon series.
And in regard to the 1769 Edition of the King James Bible, one of the main factors for this edition was to standardize the spelling of words in the Authorized Version.
The spelling of English words did not begin to take a stable form until the 18th century. Hence, the 1769 edition of the Authorzed Version with the standardized spelling was published.
And as far as your last comment is concerned. There is no heresy being taught.
Why don't you just believe the Book?
So basically what you are doing is making changes to it that you feel should be made. Is that the case?
You don't correct God's Book; but rather, you let God's Book correct YOU.
I recommend listening to the whole sermon series.
And in regard to the 1769 Edition of the King James Bible, one of the main factors for this edition was to standardize the spelling of words in the Authorized Version.
The spelling of English words did not begin to take a stable form until the 18th century. Hence, the 1769 edition of the Authorzed Version with the standardized spelling was published.
And as far as your last comment is concerned. There is no heresy being taught.
not even in the Oxford edition where we find the word spirit with a LOWER CASE S where it CLEARLY is referring to the Holy Spirit!!!???
What makes the KJV or AV (1611) Pure compared to say the ESV? Does that mean the language we speak now is wrong, and that would then mean that American English could be classed as a disgracefull blasphemy.. if used in a bible translation?
Interesting.
Yet in another thread you condemn spelling differences as being satanic, or do you see the 1769 as satanic?
Cambridge is equally guilty.
1 John 5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one. (c. 1900 "Pure" "Cambridge" "Edition")
1 John 5:8 And there are three that beare witnesse in earth, the Spirit, and the Water, and the Blood, and these three agree in one. (KJV)
Keep in mind that the English language itself was going through a refining and purification process in the 17th and 18th centuries. Therefore, there was really no need for further refining after the 1769 edition of the Authorized Version. And as David Reagan said, 80% of the corrections were made by 1638. And those corrections were for the earlier printing and typographical errors which had occurred. So again; as stated before, the main purpose of the 1769 edition, and also the 1762 edition was simply for the standardization of spelling.
And the second thing that was mainly being discussed in that other thread was the fact that in Bible Numerics, the number seven means completion, purity, and spiritual perfection. And that the number 6 is the number of man.
So the word Saviour (7 letters) means we a have a perfect Saviour. And Savior (6 letters) could be a reference to anyone. Remember 7 is the number of completion and perfection. 6 is the number of man. So concerning this change, in Bible Numerology it is a very serious one.
Therefore, my convictions regarding this difference remains firm. And a lot of the other Bible believing brethren also have conviction about this.
ANother typically poor intellectual thinking and logic by your cult.
Language is continually evolving, there is no such thing as a perfect refined language. The language we speak and write is different from what it was 200 years ago, in 200 years time the language of today will be strange.
spelling was not very important and OUR and OR were in common use for centuries, when you look into it,the ridiculous claims you make over savior or saviour is pathetic at best.
Your cult is an embarrassment to Christianity.
it is true that English is devolving; this is what happens to a language which either does not have the word of God in that language or abandon the teaching of the word of God
the fact is the KJV is single handedly responsible for the greatest missionary movement in history

So that's why the KJV is the only translation with the term "unicorn", they were hunted out of existance after it's publication?
it is true that English is devolving; this is what happens to a language which either does not have the word of God in that language or abandon the teaching of the word of God
The reason that the English language devolved is because of vnicorne extinction. The only way to reverse this tragic trend is to use the KJV 1611 only.
I started a new thread and would appreciate everyone's comments:
http://christianchat.com/bible-disc...enies-divinity-jesus-christ-john-14-14-a.html