Living communally, not every person needed a house of their own, and their relinquishing of their personal property was by choice, not force, a choice from which they also drew benefits. In communism, the state seizes everything whether the individual gives consent or not. They don't have a choice in the matter.
As far as being by choice, buying stock in IBM when it was first being offered was a choice, because the person wouldn't lose anything as a direct result of their decision to buy the stock, nor would they be cast into hell if they decided not to buy the stock.
As far as relinquishing their property by choice and not force, according to the NIV it is written in Acts 5:4, "Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied just to human beings but to God."
So if the land belonged to the person before they sold it, then wouldn't the money belong to them after they sold it? So if they didn't give all the money to the Apostles, then why did Jesus kill Ananias and his wife Sapphira for keeping back part of the price they sold they land for?