Did man land on the moon?
- Thread starter PC123
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You have me confused with other posters. I did a search for this expression that I have highlighted in red, there are only two posters on this forum who have used that expression: Dude653 and Nehemiah6. Both of you have used this expression twice.
Therefore out of 12,000 posts I have not used it once, so your conclusion that I would use it to refer to a toaster is really not scientific. More like wild speculation from an unstable mind.
Therefore out of 12,000 posts I have not used it once, so your conclusion that I would use it to refer to a toaster is really not scientific. More like wild speculation from an unstable mind.
-
2
- Show all
As important as that is, here's something of much more significance IMHO, my friend. Check it out...V
NASA Document Unclassified
NASA Document Unclassified
"Humans have negative value' -- Seems like someone has done the math. She says we are being controlled by corporations, I guess they are focused on the bottom line.
I think this document would be very helpful in the gospel. The world has concluded you are worth more dead than alive and that you have a "negative value" but Jesus died for you. He loves you. God the Father gave His Son that you might have life and have it more abundantly.
I think this document would be very helpful in the gospel. The world has concluded you are worth more dead than alive and that you have a "negative value" but Jesus died for you. He loves you. God the Father gave His Son that you might have life and have it more abundantly.
-
1
- Show all
"The individual in question" -- I would hope that this is a reference to each individuals salvation and standing before God. It will certainly be doom and gloom if they have not repented of their sins and pleaded the blood of Jesus to wash their sins away.
That is certainly "the question" -- Where will you spend eternity? Will it be doom and gloom or will it be in the arms of Jesus with praise and thanksgiving?
This is a question that each individual must answer. You are not saved because your parents were, or because you were born in America or because you are "good". The only payment God respects for your sins is the blood of Jesus.
That is certainly "the question" -- Where will you spend eternity? Will it be doom and gloom or will it be in the arms of Jesus with praise and thanksgiving?
This is a question that each individual must answer. You are not saved because your parents were, or because you were born in America or because you are "good". The only payment God respects for your sins is the blood of Jesus.
If that doesn't cheer up your day, not sure what will! 
-
1
- Show all
I accidentally ran across this .
Hopefully posting this won't get me banned t😮😮!
Can You go to Mars?! 😄
No
Why?
Answer....
Hopefully posting this won't get me banned t😮😮!
Can You go to Mars?! 😄
No
Why?
Answer....
What do people, especially Christians accomplish by disproving that we went to the moon? IMO, the most compelling case for the moon landings isn't any one piece of actual evidence, but rather the fact that the Soviets didn't dispute it. We were ready to nuke each other back into the Stone Age, and even they admitted we got there first.
Number two piece of evidence is why bother faking it? It may sound trite but the main cost and obstacle to a moon landing - namely the massive rocket - still needed to be built and launched. If you say you went to the moon, the first thing people would ask is "how did you get there?", and the only credible answer is "in that massive rocket you watched being launched a few weeks back."
This means that if anything it would be more expensive challenging to fake it than actually go there. Hiring a soundstage, building the sets, swearing the whole crew to secrecy, faking the soil samples and moon rocks they brought back to a degree that subsequent generations of scientists would be fooled by them, developing Teflon and the other myriad spin off inventions of the Apollo program, all in addition to building and launching the massive rocket, would quickly add up.
Number two piece of evidence is why bother faking it? It may sound trite but the main cost and obstacle to a moon landing - namely the massive rocket - still needed to be built and launched. If you say you went to the moon, the first thing people would ask is "how did you get there?", and the only credible answer is "in that massive rocket you watched being launched a few weeks back."
This means that if anything it would be more expensive challenging to fake it than actually go there. Hiring a soundstage, building the sets, swearing the whole crew to secrecy, faking the soil samples and moon rocks they brought back to a degree that subsequent generations of scientists would be fooled by them, developing Teflon and the other myriad spin off inventions of the Apollo program, all in addition to building and launching the massive rocket, would quickly add up.
-
1
- Show all
Because truth is important, if for no other reason. But NASA's moon landing is the lie propping up the theory of heliocentricity, which is propping up the theory of big bangism, which is propping up evolutionism, which is the excuse for the Godless religion of atheism. Also, the government has spent billions of dollars on a fraud, which should be a concern to everyone who has taxes extorted for such purposes. Also, that the funds were used not for legitimate purposes, but spent on nefarious and Satanic plans aimed at the destruction of those who funded them. A concern for everyone, wouldn't you agree?
The Soviets and the US hierarchy were working together. This "most compelling case" is easily explained with what should now be an obvious fact.
Lol. How many rockets have been used in wars only this year and last? It's a lot cheaper building a rocket than it is getting to the moon, especially considering the latter is impossible. Think of the money, if no other reason. But go back to the garden of Eden - why did Satan lie to Eve? To sabotage God's creation. I believe Satan is behind NASA, and his aim has not changed.
Lol. You're not counting that it's cheaper to kill people than to keep paying them off. And people also have families, even if they don't care for their own safety. Stanley Kubrick, Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong are just three who tried to tell us in their own ways.
If you want to keep believing that NASA lost the technology to go back to the moon, amongst a plethora of other excuses, keep doing so. Just don't insult the intelligence of others who can see the obvious lie by trying to make out its cheaper to do the impossible than it is to fake it.
The Soviets and the US hierarchy were working together. This "most compelling case" is easily explained with what should now be an obvious fact.
Lol. How many rockets have been used in wars only this year and last? It's a lot cheaper building a rocket than it is getting to the moon, especially considering the latter is impossible. Think of the money, if no other reason. But go back to the garden of Eden - why did Satan lie to Eve? To sabotage God's creation. I believe Satan is behind NASA, and his aim has not changed.
Lol. You're not counting that it's cheaper to kill people than to keep paying them off. And people also have families, even if they don't care for their own safety. Stanley Kubrick, Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong are just three who tried to tell us in their own ways.
If you want to keep believing that NASA lost the technology to go back to the moon, amongst a plethora of other excuses, keep doing so. Just don't insult the intelligence of others who can see the obvious lie by trying to make out its cheaper to do the impossible than it is to fake it.
-
1
- Show all
It is important for folks to not overlook such things - because, the truth is sometimes plainly shown by the things that do not make sense in view of what has already supposed to have occurred.
Moses - I like the way you said this!
Notwithstanding, even without looking at the bigger picture (Flat Earth) - there is plenty-sufficient evidence to show the moon landings were faked.
Moses - I like the way you said this!
Notwithstanding, even without looking at the bigger picture (Flat Earth) - there is plenty-sufficient evidence to show the moon landings were faked.
-
1
-
1
- Show all