Will Trump Be Impeached? If not, will all of this hurt his Chances for Reelection?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Billyd

Billyd

Senior Member
#21
May 8, 2014
5,216
1,620
113
#21
President Trump should definitely be impeached. It will ensure that he will be reelected.

The Senate must also vote on the articles of impeachment that the House sends to them. Since there is no chance that he will be removed from office, it is imperative to the home folks that every senator have his name on record.
 
M

MastersApprentice

Member
#22
Sep 7, 2019
34
10
8
#22
Janeaux said:
Kind of worried cause things are not looking too good for him.
Click to expand...
Do not be fooled by the (Operation: Mockingbird) corporate media. Remember the countless times when things were "not looking too good for him" and he came out unscathed. Facts trump (pardon the pun) propaganda. The truth will come out, and he will come out on top. He always does because none of it is real.

If they had the evidence, they would hold a vote to authorize a real impeachment inquiry and hold it in public with the accused given the right to cross-examine his accuser(s). A "whistle-blower" that doesn't want to even testify in open court and expects his written "testimony" of things other people said to remove a sitting president from office? Patently absurd. What you see on TV is a circus of lies invented for your distraction.
 
L

Locoponydirtman

Guest
#23
#23
The Democrats have tried to impeach every republican president since Eisenhower.
 
tourist

tourist

Senior Member
#24
Mar 13, 2014
42,571
17,039
113
69
Tennessee
#24
PennEd said:
Actually the House ALONE impeaches a President, as they did with Bill Clinton who WAS impeached.

The Senate then decides if it will hold a trial. It did not hold a trial against Clinton, and though impeached, he wasn't removed from office. The Senate could also elect to have a trial, and even then 2/3rds of the Senate has to vote to remove a President from office.

So essentially, an impeachment by the House is the equivalent to an indictment. It carries no weight of conviction or punishment. NO President has ever been removed from office through impeachment.
Click to expand...
Actually President Clinton did have a trial in the Senate. It began Jan 7, 1999 and concluded Feb 12, 1999. He was not even close to being found guilty on any of the 4 articles of impeachment. You are correct in saying that an impeachment in the House carries no weight of conviction or punishment. It is all a dog and pony show catering to the base of the respective political party that chose to pursue impeachment. Total waste of time and resources.
 
S

Susanna

Guest
#25
#25
tourist said:
Actually President Clinton did have a trial in the Senate. It began Jan 7, 1999 and concluded Feb 12, 1999. He was not even close to being found guilty on any of the 4 articles of impeachment. You are correct in saying that an impeachment in the House carries no weight of conviction or punishment. It is all a dog and pony show catering to the base of the respective political party that chose to pursue impeachment. Total waste of time and resources.
Click to expand...
Excellent analysis of the general impeachment process regardless of what side starting it.
 
R

reneweddaybyday

Senior Member
#26
Mar 23, 2016
7,021
1,673
113
#26
[bold in article is mine]

Schiff pushed Volker to say Ukraine felt pressure from Trump
by Byron York | October 16, 2019 04:00 PM


In a secret interview, Rep. Adam Schiff, leader of the House Democratic effort to impeach President Trump, pressed former United States special representative to Ukraine Kurt Volker to testify that Ukrainian officials felt pressured to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter as a result of Trump withholding U.S. military aid to Ukraine.


Volker denied that was the case, noting that Ukrainian leaders did not even know the aid was being withheld and that they believed their relationship with the U.S. was moving along satisfactorily, without them having done anything Trump mentioned in his notorious July 25 phone conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

When Volker repeatedly declined to agree to Schiff's characterization of events, Schiff said, "Ambassador, you're making this much more complicated than it has to be."

...

Much of the coverage of Volker's testimony focused on his opening statement, which made its way to the media. (Washington Post headline: "Volker defends Biden as 'man of integrity' in testimony to Congress.") But there was much more to the testimony than the opening statement. Among other things, it showed how Schiff, as a powerful chairman in charge of impeachment, pursues his theory of the case even when a witness gives testimony that does not support it.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...olker-to-say-ukraine-felt-pressure-from-trump



 
You must log in or register to reply here.