Who will Win

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,778
8,613
113

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,129
30,263
113
Not a problem. Things get heated in here. I think we need a "coffee and cupcake" forum here where we're all "bosom friends" and we only talk about our pets, hobbies and good things. :)
One such thread is called Speak Your Mind... it is even in the BDF! :D
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,778
8,613
113
Trump's legal team needs to do a better job with providing proof of fraud. Affidavits, expert witnesses on software programs alone, which is basically what they have, are not sufficient. Republicans should not want to set a precedent where affidavits and expert witnesses alone are sufficient. Otherwise in future elections Democrats can EASILY find fake affidavits from 2000 to 3000 people to change election results.

Their best arguments right now are Constitutional violations, but I believe only Pennsylvania has that case.
The best constitutional breach case is Wisconsin. Pennsylvania looks very good. Arizona is coming along nicely. Affidavits are fine........ all you have to do is convince the judge. Judges do this for a living they will get a good sense of the affidavits and rule accordingly.

As of now I think Trump will take this via the courts and through the legislatures.
 
May 31, 2020
1,706
1,559
113
Jenna Ellis @JennaEllisEsq This is totally unacceptable that a sitting Michigan State Representative would try to intimidate and publicly dox a witness on national television simply because she doesn’t like the witness’s testimony

Jenna Ellis on Twitter: "This is totally unacceptable that a sitting Michigan State Representative would try to intimidate and publicly dox a witness on national television simply because she doesn’t like the witness’s testimony. Sanctions???" / Twitter
I knew you were referring to that hate-filled demonic even before clicking on the thread.
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
Joe stated he wanted a diverse admin. that "looked like America. From what I've seen so far his picks are well qualified Mr. So.
This nation began in 1776 and it is now 2020 and both the Republicans and Democrats have promised to solve the problems we are facing now for 244 years and have not done so yet. They have served for four years or eight year terms in office one after the next and have always stated when running and serving in office that they would fix these issues but have not.

At some point it should occur to us that it is not an issue of who is qualified but rather who is actually willing to do it. As for his appointments they have not yet taken office but we will see if they are willing to actually do what they say they are qualified to do like we have for 244 years will we not? If not we will hire them and evaluate their performance and fire them and rehire the ones we fired four or eight years prior and continue in the same cycle we are already in.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,614
9,127
113
There is NO evidence some will accept as good enough to declare President Trump the winner.

Just like their is no evidence good enough for some to accept the lockdowns are a hoax to get people to inject poison in the bodies.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,614
9,127
113
This nation began in 1776 and it is now 2020 and both the Republicans and Democrats have promised to solve the problems we are facing now for 244 years and have not done so yet. They have served for four years or eight year terms in office one after the next and have always stated when running and serving in office that they would fix these issues but have not.

At some point it should occur to us that it is not an issue of who is qualified but rather who is actually willing to do it. As for his appointments they have not yet taken office but we will see if they are willing to actually do what they say they are qualified to do like we have for 244 years will we not? If not we will hire them and evaluate their performance and fire them and rehire the ones we fired four or eight years prior and continue in the same cycle we are already in.
Umm. Mr Ruth has had his last plate appearance.

He’s downed his last hot dog.

He has been as bannished as Pete Rose.

Fare thee well Pretend Sultan of swat!!
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
Umm. Mr Ruth has had his last plate appearance.

He’s downed his last hot dog.

He has been as bannished as Pete Rose.

Fare thee well Pretend Sultan of swat!!

It's obvious that neither of your two sides are listening to each other anymore which is sad because both have good points of argument which is why I agreed with you and ask the question several post back...
 
May 31, 2020
1,706
1,559
113
There is NO evidence some will accept as good enough to declare President Trump the winner.

Just like their is no evidence good enough for some to accept the lockdowns are a hoax to get people to inject poison in the bodies.
C’est la vie. Let them inject the poison. Like Jesus says, shake the dust off your feet.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
It's obvious that neither of your two sides are listening to each other anymore which is sad because both have good points of argument which is why I agreed with you and ask the question several post back...
At least he did not falsely present a science report on HCQ pretending it was a blind study when it was no such thing.

People drop integrity pretty quick when it does not match their hoax theories and meanwhile USA leads the world in deaths, oh that is right elderly people do not matter.
 

Truth7t7

Well-known member
May 19, 2020
7,685
2,495
113
This of course fits the observations of the election fraud counting delays perfectly.
But I think the question resolves down to chain of custody. Any votes with a breaking the chain of custody that cannot be forensically audited should be thrown away. I think Scotus is going to award all swing states to Trump. The evidence is vastly overwhelming.

Trump wins in a landslide.
Just on the fact that voting rules in these swing States were changed outside of the States own constitutional laws, that should be done by the legislature, puts a win in the Trump corner.

Curing and correcting votes in democratic precincts in violation of State laws, disregarding the US constitution in equal protection
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
At least he did not falsely present a science report on HCQ pretending it was a blind study when it was no such thing.

People drop integrity pretty quick when it does not match their hoax theories and meanwhile USA leads the world in deaths, oh that is right elderly people do not matter.

In post #2632 some of the issues he addressed though do you agree he is correct, You didn't answer
 

calibob

Sinner saved by grace
May 29, 2018
8,268
5,516
113
Anaheim, Cali.
"Abandon hope all ye who enter here".
Let me ask you though in the spirit of an non biased opinion. would you agree that the issues that many of the Trump supporters are arguing(pro life,homosexuality ect.) are an sin and need to be spoken of as such? And not that I see to attack your nation but how do you see this of your nations policies https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2020/10/23/Nova-Scotia-Lobster-War/

And not that the US is immune to these same type ideas and policies we have the same in that we say we are attempting to end racism but in the NFL who writes it in their end-zones they also boast https://www.npr.org/2020/11/23/9380...ew-to-work-tonights-monday-night-football-gam as if it is not racism to single out any one race in jobs.

Or is it correct for Joe Biden to say publicly that he was choosing a vice president who was a women of a minority race(not that I endorse discrimination) and fill his administration with peoples chosen by race and gender instead of placing them there based on qualification(regardless of race or gender)?
Three issues Id' like to address here and now. I am opposed to LBGTQ's public displays. I think they already border line on having more rights than normal people. I've even heard of Christian summer camps being threatened with closure due to sexual identification discrimination. Also the Baker that was taken to court because he refused to make a Gay wedding cake. What a load of :poop:. Since I am adopted, abortion would have ended not only me, but my children, their children etc.... Thus abortion is tantamount to geocide in my opinion.

However I will not Co-sign environmental rape and destruction or De-regulation of the banking and stock markets, Globalization and trade deals that hurt the U.S. Blue collar class, (which I have always identified with). Or the lack of healthcare coverage for every U.S. citizen which is discrimination against the poor! Working or not.

I'm fairly confident that somebody pays the NFL and the stadiums to do their bidding. It's no longer a true game devoid of politics or racism and reverse racism. It's a business. In the interest of the veneer of political correctness, they might say, do or put anything in public that makes them look good to their fan base.

For Joe Biden to say publicly that; He chose a vice president who was a women of a minority race and to fill his administration with peoples' chosen by race, ethnicity or gender, is reverse discrimination.
 
E

EleventhHour

Guest
In post #2632 some of the issues he addressed though do you agree he is correct, You didn't answer
Thinking, it requires some thought because you are bringing together different aspects of things.
I may PM if that is okay.
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
Three issues Id' like to address here and now. I am opposed to LBGTQ's public displays. I think they already border line on having more rights than normal people. I've even heard of Christian summer camps being threatened with closure due to sexual identification discrimination. Also the Baker that was taken to court because he refused to make a Gay wedding cake. What a load of :poop:. Since I am adopted, abortion would have ended not only me, but my children, their children etc.... Thus abortion is tantamount to geocide in my opinion.

However I will not Co-sign environmental rape and destruction or De-regulation of the banking and stock markets, Globalization and trade deals that hurt the U.S. Blue collar class, (which I have always identified with). Or the lack of healthcare coverage for every U.S. citizen which is discrimination against the poor! Working or not.

I'm fairly confident that somebody pays the NFL and the stadiums to do their bidding. It's no longer a true game devoid of politics or racism and reverse racism. It's a business. In the interest of the veneer of political correctness, they might say, do or put anything in public that makes them look good to their fan base.

For Joe Biden to say publicly that; He chose a vice president who was a women of a minority race and to fill his administration with peoples' chosen by race, ethnicity or gender, is reverse discrimination.

Yes I agree a lot of the arguments are from a Christian point of view and should be easy to agree on as good or evil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.