This Corona virus pandemic could be the weapon that takes our liberties away , all in the name of saving lives?
- Thread starter Whispered
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Censorship in science...
Two groups of experts have different views on something but instead of going ahead with the scientific procedures one group gets cancelled by social media and mainstream media who themselves are not qualified to make such discernments...
The only way i can see this happening is if one group pays these media outlets to cancel the other group thus avoiding the science and debate all together... Not only do i regard this as unscientific but it makes me very skeptical of the party that is paying these media outlets to avoid science.
Proven according to one side. Unproven according to the other... Who decides to censor???
Science should take place and after some scrutiny and debate the truth prevails.
Instead the unqualified media is making these decisions which opens it up to corruption
And to say they were right to censor is just an admission of being unscientific
Two groups of experts have different views on something but instead of going ahead with the scientific procedures one group gets cancelled by social media and mainstream media who themselves are not qualified to make such discernments...
The only way i can see this happening is if one group pays these media outlets to cancel the other group thus avoiding the science and debate all together... Not only do i regard this as unscientific but it makes me very skeptical of the party that is paying these media outlets to avoid science.
Proven according to one side. Unproven according to the other... Who decides to censor???
Science should take place and after some scrutiny and debate the truth prevails.
Instead the unqualified media is making these decisions which opens it up to corruption
And to say they were right to censor is just an admission of being unscientific
-
1
- Show all
April 19, 2020 Gate’s Contraceptive Microchip to be Implanted into Women
The Eugenics (Population Control) Movement in the United States
https://education.blogs.archives.gov/2017/05/02/buck-v-bell/ “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”
Underlined Selection from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Opinion in the case of Buck v. BellBill Gates told The Financial Times April 8, 2020, “You don’t have a choice… Normalcy only returns when we largely vaccinate the entire population.” (he's referring to Covid 19)
“You Don’t Have a Choice – Normalcy Only Returns When We Largely Vaccinate the Entire Population” – Creepy Bill Gates Gets Creepier (VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
Published August 2, 2020
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Kinda makes ya wonder why false positives for Covid 19 are being reported in America. Along with what sustains the, get tested, movement behind it all, as if not being tested could cause the worst outcome, the numbers of false deaths reported due to Covid 19.
I wondered if this virus was that bad why anyone would lie about test results and death numbers. Now, it isn't that hard to figure out. If our country is lying, what about other countries? And why? To reiterate a global pandemic and push the mandate for compulsory concession to a vaccine maybe?
I wondered if this virus was that bad why anyone would lie about test results and death numbers. Now, it isn't that hard to figure out. If our country is lying, what about other countries? And why? To reiterate a global pandemic and push the mandate for compulsory concession to a vaccine maybe?
True. Try telling people down here and they try and bite your head off... Their cheering on Dictator Dan...
There is no leader in the western world that is doing a more totalitarian job than Dan i think...
He is purging the sick and old as well as the unemployed and lower class. Straight out of Stalins book
There is no leader in the western world that is doing a more totalitarian job than Dan i think...
He is purging the sick and old as well as the unemployed and lower class. Straight out of Stalins book
-
1
-
1
- Show all
S
Did you fact check this? I am not saying you are wrong. I just can't find the vaccine that he has patented. All I could find were numerous fact check sites saying that it was not true and that he is funding vaccine development for several companies. I cannot even find that he is profiting from it but I would think that his foundation would be smart enough to invest in the stock of the companies they are funding so that they can give back even more when the vaccine is a success and the stock soars sky high. It would only be wise as long as the money goes back into the foundation and back into giving for good causes like vaccines. Can a non profit do that? I have no idea.
https://www.politifact.com/factchec...-foundation-does-not-have-patent-coronavirus/
https://www.politifact.com/factchec...-foundation-does-not-have-patent-coronavirus/
-
1
- Show all
S
He does not need to make billions on the vaccine. He is giving billions to develop vaccines, and he still keeps making billions from all his current investments. I don't think there is any concerns about running out of money, and with Buffett also pledging the majority of his wealth to the Gates foundation there is no need for him to focus on profits. He says that he expects many of the companies he is funding to not pan out but if we get a couple of vaccines it will be all worth it. He knows that not all of the factories he is funding will be used, only a couple but they can't do them serially one at at time because that is too slow, they need to do them all at the same time or it will take too long and too many more people will die.
-
1
- Show all
LoL "fact checking"...
... Another new term for censoring......
"Misinformation" is another term that means censoring...
All through the 80s, 90s and 2000s there was never any censoring, no "fact checking", no "misinformation", no cancel culture...
But now, all of the sudden, its like we need to be "fact checking" and looking out for "misinformation" ok cos its dangerous... Na
I'll give a hypothetical example. Lets say that America was going to send men to the moon but are torn over which approach to take.
Half of the scientists support approach A and say that approach B will lead to a catastrophe.
The other half support approach B and say that approach A will be a catastrophe.
Now there is no science anymore its all about cancelling...
So who does Mark Zuckerberg remove as "misinformation"? Who does CNN, BBC and the other media outlets cancel???
Neither of them are qualified scientists so how do they make the decision... Easy... It becomes an auction...
The group of scientists that can "ally" with the most media outlets will have their approach promoted and the opposing approach will be demonized...
This is not science...
"The science is settled, climate change is real, there is no debate, their just deniers" That is why climate change is false
"Vaccines are safe, the science is clear, it is not debatable, their just anti-vaxers" Vaccine safety is false
"Science says that you are born gay and if you disagree your a homophobe" Homosexuality is false
"Science says that boys can be girls and girls can be boys and if u disagree your a bigot" Transgerism is false
"Science says that all of life evolved from one organism if you don't agree your anti-science" Theory of evolution is false
Beware, whenever you see such tactics being employed to stifle debate then it is most certainly false...
This is just a tactic used by the left in politics and it has carried over into science where many now think its acceptable to replace scientific processes with it... Its that typical left attitude that their right and anyone who doesn't agree is wrong either morally or scientifically...
... Another new term for censoring...... "Misinformation" is another term that means censoring...
All through the 80s, 90s and 2000s there was never any censoring, no "fact checking", no "misinformation", no cancel culture...
But now, all of the sudden, its like we need to be "fact checking" and looking out for "misinformation" ok cos its dangerous... Na
I'll give a hypothetical example. Lets say that America was going to send men to the moon but are torn over which approach to take.
Half of the scientists support approach A and say that approach B will lead to a catastrophe.
The other half support approach B and say that approach A will be a catastrophe.
Now there is no science anymore its all about cancelling...
So who does Mark Zuckerberg remove as "misinformation"? Who does CNN, BBC and the other media outlets cancel???
Neither of them are qualified scientists so how do they make the decision... Easy... It becomes an auction...
The group of scientists that can "ally" with the most media outlets will have their approach promoted and the opposing approach will be demonized...
This is not science...
"The science is settled, climate change is real, there is no debate, their just deniers" That is why climate change is false
"Vaccines are safe, the science is clear, it is not debatable, their just anti-vaxers" Vaccine safety is false
"Science says that you are born gay and if you disagree your a homophobe" Homosexuality is false
"Science says that boys can be girls and girls can be boys and if u disagree your a bigot" Transgerism is false
"Science says that all of life evolved from one organism if you don't agree your anti-science" Theory of evolution is false
Beware, whenever you see such tactics being employed to stifle debate then it is most certainly false...
This is just a tactic used by the left in politics and it has carried over into science where many now think its acceptable to replace scientific processes with it... Its that typical left attitude that their right and anyone who doesn't agree is wrong either morally or scientifically...
-
1
-
1
- Show all
S
LoL "fact checking"...... Another new term for censoring......
"Misinformation" is another term that means censoring...
All through the 80s, 90s and 2000s there was never any censoring, no "fact checking", no "misinformation", no cancel culture...
But now, all of the sudden, its like we need to be "fact checking" and looking out for "misinformation" ok cos its dangerous... Na
I'll give a hypothetical example. Lets say that America was going to send men to the moon but are torn over which approach to take.
Half of the scientists support approach A and say that approach B will lead to a catastrophe.
The other half support approach B and say that approach A will be a catastrophe.
Now there is no science anymore its all about cancelling...
So who does Mark Zuckerberg remove as "misinformation"? Who does CNN, BBC and the other media outlets cancel???
Neither of them are qualified scientists so how do they make the decision... Easy... It becomes an auction...
The group of scientists that can "ally" with the most media outlets will have their approach promoted and the opposing approach will be demonized...
This is not science...
"The science is settled, climate change is real, there is no debate, their just deniers" That is why climate change is false
"Vaccines are safe, the science is clear, it is not debatable, their just anti-vaxers" Vaccine safety is false
"Science says that you are born gay and if you disagree your a homophobe" Homosexuality is false
"Science says that boys can be girls and girls can be boys and if u disagree your a bigot" Transgerism is false
"Science says that all of life evolved from one organism if you don't agree your anti-science" Theory of evolution is false
Beware, whenever you see such tactics being employed to stifle debate then it is most certainly false...
This is just a tactic used by the left in politics and it has carried over into science where many now think its acceptable to replace scientific processes with it... Its that typical left attitude that their right and anyone who doesn't agree is wrong either morally or scientifically...
... Another new term for censoring......"Misinformation" is another term that means censoring...
All through the 80s, 90s and 2000s there was never any censoring, no "fact checking", no "misinformation", no cancel culture...
But now, all of the sudden, its like we need to be "fact checking" and looking out for "misinformation" ok cos its dangerous... Na
I'll give a hypothetical example. Lets say that America was going to send men to the moon but are torn over which approach to take.
Half of the scientists support approach A and say that approach B will lead to a catastrophe.
The other half support approach B and say that approach A will be a catastrophe.
Now there is no science anymore its all about cancelling...
So who does Mark Zuckerberg remove as "misinformation"? Who does CNN, BBC and the other media outlets cancel???
Neither of them are qualified scientists so how do they make the decision... Easy... It becomes an auction...
The group of scientists that can "ally" with the most media outlets will have their approach promoted and the opposing approach will be demonized...
This is not science...
"The science is settled, climate change is real, there is no debate, their just deniers" That is why climate change is false
"Vaccines are safe, the science is clear, it is not debatable, their just anti-vaxers" Vaccine safety is false
"Science says that you are born gay and if you disagree your a homophobe" Homosexuality is false
"Science says that boys can be girls and girls can be boys and if u disagree your a bigot" Transgerism is false
"Science says that all of life evolved from one organism if you don't agree your anti-science" Theory of evolution is false
Beware, whenever you see such tactics being employed to stifle debate then it is most certainly false...
This is just a tactic used by the left in politics and it has carried over into science where many now think its acceptable to replace scientific processes with it... Its that typical left attitude that their right and anyone who doesn't agree is wrong either morally or scientifically...
Science can be presented. There is no credible science presented about a gay gene. (except for those skinny jeans
) If your debate defense it to claim that anyone who disagrees with you is part of the conspiracy then you have no defense and your theories fall further into disrepute, as well as your reasoning capabilities.
Since such posts like the one from the Henry Ford Medical Health System study that show that HCQ cut deaths significantly are not flagged or taken down it would lead me to believe that your theory is not accurate. There is no conspiracy to take down positive news about HCQ.
But these platforms are not government entities and they can allow what they want anyway. I think we will have to pass some laws controlling the freedom of these social media platforms and then will you champion their right to control their own companies without government controls or will you be on the side of CENSORSHIP from government imposed upon these companies. When the government tells them they cannot enforce their own content policies it will be an intrusion the rights of these individual corporations.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
They were calling Bill Gates the Antichrist in the 90s and we were having to argue with nut cases back then and fact check fake websites. I remember. Where were you?
Science can be presented. There is no credible science presented about a gay gene. (except for those skinny jeans)
If your debate defense it to claim that anyone who disagrees with you is part of the conspiracy then you have no defense and your theories fall further into disrepute, as well as your reasoning capabilities.
Since such posts like the one from the Henry Ford Medical Health System study that show that HCQ cut deaths significantly are not flagged or taken down it would lead me to believe that your theory is not accurate. There is no conspiracy to take down positive news about HCQ.
But these platforms are not government entities and they can allow what they want anyway. I think we will have to pass some laws controlling the freedom of these social media platforms and then will you champion their right to control their own companies without government controls or will you be on the side of CENSORSHIP from government imposed upon these companies. When the government tells them they cannot enforce their own content policies it will be an intrusion the rights of these individual corporations.
Science can be presented. There is no credible science presented about a gay gene. (except for those skinny jeans
)If your debate defense it to claim that anyone who disagrees with you is part of the conspiracy then you have no defense and your theories fall further into disrepute, as well as your reasoning capabilities.
Since such posts like the one from the Henry Ford Medical Health System study that show that HCQ cut deaths significantly are not flagged or taken down it would lead me to believe that your theory is not accurate. There is no conspiracy to take down positive news about HCQ.
But these platforms are not government entities and they can allow what they want anyway. I think we will have to pass some laws controlling the freedom of these social media platforms and then will you champion their right to control their own companies without government controls or will you be on the side of CENSORSHIP from government imposed upon these companies. When the government tells them they cannot enforce their own content policies it will be an intrusion the rights of these individual corporations.
" cryptocurrency system using body activity data"
patent number " wo2020060606A1.
involves microchiping people.
owner of patent-microsoft.
what is in the patent number-666
so, " debunk " all you want.
i would rather use facts, like those above.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
