The law works like this, the prosecution bears the burden of guilty to present a case beyond a reasonable doubt.... so it not at the level of a clear cut case.
Lawyers, in retrospect have examined the evidence and the testimonies of the case and have affirmed it met the threshold of "beyond a reasonable doubt."
And please do not bring in the racism card because the police brought in a black man and found him believable and let him go.
He was pronounced guilty by a white all male jury and he was white and it was based on the evidence and the testimonies.
It was only after successful powerful lobbing of certain organizations in backroom deals was his sentence commuted.
Frank's pedantry is on record.
Lawyers, in retrospect have examined the evidence and the testimonies of the case and have affirmed it met the threshold of "beyond a reasonable doubt."
And please do not bring in the racism card because the police brought in a black man and found him believable and let him go.
He was pronounced guilty by a white all male jury and he was white and it was based on the evidence and the testimonies.
It was only after successful powerful lobbing of certain organizations in backroom deals was his sentence commuted.
Frank's pedantry is on record.
- 1
- Show all