Texas Abortion Law Leaves Planned Parenthood in Tears
- Thread starter Genipher
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
No, it doesn't.
People who conflate the 2nd amendment with abortion won't realize that.
The only semblance of relationship the OT gun topic has to this thread is among those who believe violating people's Constitutional rights keeps us safe.
How about we violate the first amendment? No more religious freedom. Because any religion's zealots pose a threat to the non-religious.
Keep your faith to yourselves. And we'll all be safe. Besides, faith is personal. It doesn't need to go public when that can upset the moral framework others hold dear.
I know, let's repeal the amendment that repealed slavery.
Just look at how contemporary black people abuse their freedoms. BLM, for instance.
Ran by racists who publicly boast they're trained Marxists.
BLM, pays for TV ad space wherein they state all lives can't matter until black lives matter.
And then their membership prices it through acts of terrorist, vandalism, and murder.
What's next? Who wants to repeal the first amendment also due to the abuses of the Cancel Culture?
If you're not free to opine,you'll be less likely to riot. Two birds with one stone, since this would also shut down BLM.
So much Constitution, so little time.
People who conflate the 2nd amendment with abortion won't realize that.
The only semblance of relationship the OT gun topic has to this thread is among those who believe violating people's Constitutional rights keeps us safe.
How about we violate the first amendment? No more religious freedom. Because any religion's zealots pose a threat to the non-religious.
Keep your faith to yourselves. And we'll all be safe. Besides, faith is personal. It doesn't need to go public when that can upset the moral framework others hold dear.
I know, let's repeal the amendment that repealed slavery.
Just look at how contemporary black people abuse their freedoms. BLM, for instance.
Ran by racists who publicly boast they're trained Marxists.
BLM, pays for TV ad space wherein they state all lives can't matter until black lives matter.
And then their membership prices it through acts of terrorist, vandalism, and murder.
What's next? Who wants to repeal the first amendment also due to the abuses of the Cancel Culture?
If you're not free to opine,you'll be less likely to riot. Two birds with one stone, since this would also shut down BLM.
So much Constitution, so little time.
-
2
- Show all
Dear God,please tell me this guy doesn't drive!
The first murder in recorded history was said to occur with the assailant using a rock. Though the actual "weapon" isn't stated.
Should we outlaw rocks?
Guns don't kill people. Cars don't kill people. People kill people.
Let's outlaw people.
The first murder in recorded history was said to occur with the assailant using a rock. Though the actual "weapon" isn't stated.
Should we outlaw rocks?
Guns don't kill people. Cars don't kill people. People kill people.
Let's outlaw people.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
First of all, there is no right to shoot children. That right does not exist.
Secondly, abortion and bearing arms is a false equivalency.
As far as license to own a gun…even if you hold that is a good position, allowing people to own a gun without a license is not the same as “ right to shoot people”.
Secondly, abortion and bearing arms is a false equivalency.
As far as license to own a gun…even if you hold that is a good position, allowing people to own a gun without a license is not the same as “ right to shoot people”.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
I think you should have liability insurance if you own a gun and it should be the law. Now if you have had a gun your whole life and you have a gun safe and there are no small children in the house I would think the insurance would be very small. But here are the advantages of such a rule:
1. Police find a bullet and casing in a crime, they can subpoena all the insurance companies. They check their records and tell the cops within hours who owns the gun and who is insuring it. Right now the US government is not allowed to keep a digital record of this as it is viewed as the first step in taking the guns away.
2. When you buy a gun the retailer is motivated to approve the sale. However, the insurance company is going to be far more selective. So someone with a whole bunch of red flags might get an estimate that is prohibitively high. Can't buy the gun without proof of insurance.
3. Whenever you buy anything related to your gun you have to show proof of insurance. Now suppose you have that guy who shot up Las Vegas. The insurance company is seeing that he has bought a dozen guns, he has bump stock with all of them, he has a steamer trunk full of ammunition. They are going to be liable for the mayhem so you can be sure they will spot this immediately with their various algorithms and notify the authorities.
4. Or you have the guy in Colorado who bought a gun legally, bought body armor, and then started seeing a psychiatrist. Once again, red flags might have alerted the police prior to the incident.
5. What really started to make cars safe was when we required drivers be insured. All of a sudden we had a huge lobbyists arguing for safety criteria, crash tests, rating cars based on safety, mandatory seat belts, mandatory air bags, etc.
1. Police find a bullet and casing in a crime, they can subpoena all the insurance companies. They check their records and tell the cops within hours who owns the gun and who is insuring it. Right now the US government is not allowed to keep a digital record of this as it is viewed as the first step in taking the guns away.
2. When you buy a gun the retailer is motivated to approve the sale. However, the insurance company is going to be far more selective. So someone with a whole bunch of red flags might get an estimate that is prohibitively high. Can't buy the gun without proof of insurance.
3. Whenever you buy anything related to your gun you have to show proof of insurance. Now suppose you have that guy who shot up Las Vegas. The insurance company is seeing that he has bought a dozen guns, he has bump stock with all of them, he has a steamer trunk full of ammunition. They are going to be liable for the mayhem so you can be sure they will spot this immediately with their various algorithms and notify the authorities.
4. Or you have the guy in Colorado who bought a gun legally, bought body armor, and then started seeing a psychiatrist. Once again, red flags might have alerted the police prior to the incident.
5. What really started to make cars safe was when we required drivers be insured. All of a sudden we had a huge lobbyists arguing for safety criteria, crash tests, rating cars based on safety, mandatory seat belts, mandatory air bags, etc.
-
1
- Show all
Also, I don’t think requiring a license would end gun violence.
a. People with drivers licenses sometimes murder with their car
b. Guns can be bought illegally
c. Sometimes the shooters use someone else’s gun.
D. It’s ok if you favor requiring a license to carry. But having a gun in your home shouldn’t require any government control.
e. I am ok with gun control for people who have committed gun related crimes in the past.
a. People with drivers licenses sometimes murder with their car
b. Guns can be bought illegally
c. Sometimes the shooters use someone else’s gun.
D. It’s ok if you favor requiring a license to carry. But having a gun in your home shouldn’t require any government control.
e. I am ok with gun control for people who have committed gun related crimes in the past.
K
What do you call credible sources? Google " how many genders are there according to science" see what answer you come up with. Maybe there's a handful of conservative scientists that would come out and say that. But who would believe them? The radicals have everyone believing there are dozens of genders.
-
1
- Show all
K
Guttmacher is an arm of Planned Parenthood, their stats are medical/rape/ incest are 4 percent of abortions. I haven't seen any other stats used. Pro- choicers use the medical/rape/ incest argument to justify 60 million abortions. 92% of abortions in America are purely elective — done on healthy women to end the lives of healthy children according to Guttmacher. So I don't get stuck on 1% if abortions due to rape. I believe that while rape is horrific, it is not the fault of the baby. Give the child up for adoption, same as incest cases. For me, life of the mother is the only situation an abortion may have to be performed. And that is extremely rare.
-
2
- Show all
Re: what do I call credible sources?
Typically, if it is a science issue, peer review would qualify. Though as to be expected in these times, that is under scrutiny as to its legitimacy.
The mental health field, sciences, have already compromised in matters of disorders that at one time identified gender confusion, DSD (Disorders of Sex Development), and homosexuality, as emotional and mental disorders. Not so much anymore.
Largely due to pressure from the LGBTQ+ community.
Perhaps, in matters of gender, science does say still that there are but two sexes. Female, Male.
Science there are only two genders
It's late here and I don't want to have that visual in my head before bed.
Typically, if it is a science issue, peer review would qualify. Though as to be expected in these times, that is under scrutiny as to its legitimacy.
The mental health field, sciences, have already compromised in matters of disorders that at one time identified gender confusion, DSD (Disorders of Sex Development), and homosexuality, as emotional and mental disorders. Not so much anymore.
Largely due to pressure from the LGBTQ+ community.
Perhaps, in matters of gender, science does say still that there are but two sexes. Female, Male.
Science there are only two genders
It's late here and I don't want to have that visual in my head before bed.-
1
- Show all