E
The entire report needs to be put in the trash can, or if its in England....then into the Dustbin. When it comes to science the three most important things are #1 Data, #2 Data and #3 Data. This report did not have enough data to draw the conclusions that it did....so anything it has to say should be disregarded. The authors relied too heavily on incomplete (and perhaps fraudulent) data from China as well as woefully inadequate reporting from Italy.
There was another report put out by a team from Oxford (I have not read that actual report) that forecasts that the pandemic has pretty much run its course, suggesting that up to half of the British population has been exposed, and has thus built up an immunity....the oft cited "communal immunity". Again, there isn't enough data yet to draw that conclusion...but ultimately I do agree with the need to scale back mitigation efforts and to get people back to work.....continuing these draconian measures is going to cause lots of harm and in my opinion the harm of 'mitigation' is worse than any benefits.
There was another report put out by a team from Oxford (I have not read that actual report) that forecasts that the pandemic has pretty much run its course, suggesting that up to half of the British population has been exposed, and has thus built up an immunity....the oft cited "communal immunity". Again, there isn't enough data yet to draw that conclusion...but ultimately I do agree with the need to scale back mitigation efforts and to get people back to work.....continuing these draconian measures is going to cause lots of harm and in my opinion the harm of 'mitigation' is worse than any benefits.
The real problem is the people rely on government .. if people relied on themselves they could whether the storm.