Clyburn "US will Repeat Nazi Germany if Republicans Get Power

[kaylagrl]

Like I said, Margaret Sandra has been deceased for 60 years and it's not the same organization anymore
Just like today's Germans are not complicit for what Hitler did

No, Planned Parenthood is the exact same organization. They are still practicing eugenics, still killing the innocent. Your argument of poverty is the very excuse Sanger used for sterelization that turned into abortion. There is no "allegedly" she was a racist, her closest friends were racists and we have books that she wrote that can be read today. She spoke at KKK women's meetings. There is no doubt. Germany is not murdering Jews today, Planned Parenthood is still aborting and "ridding" the world of minorities, Sangers ideals have never changed, never stopped.

 

[kaylagrl]

It physically hurts me when people say the Holocaust doesn’t matter as much as abortion. I had family die in that horror. Numbers don’t make something more or less important. It doesn’t make it less awful.

I don't see where anyone here made that comment...

 

[ZNP]

This is a radical new way to look at the world. Abortion is mercy, Slavery is actually charity, domestic abuse is really just a free education, and of course we could go on with the radical new definitions for pedophilia, and many other more explicit words, but that would get censored on this site.

 

[Dude653]

So then maybe if you decrease abortion you will decrease poverty. As soon as abortion was legalized nationwide poverty increased nationwide.

How does not having children you can't afford increase poverty?
I don't see it

 

[kaylagrl]

So maybe if we can lower poverty rates you might see abortion numbers decrease also?
Since there seems to be a correlation between poverty and abortions

My grandmother raised six boys on her own. She had help from the Salvation Army from time to time. No gov't help. It can be done. Yes, you can work on poverty but even the Bible says there will always be poor. Sanger used that same argument when she founded PP. The best thing you can do is abort your child, you're one of the undesirables.

 

[Cameron143]

So maybe if we can lower poverty rates you might see abortion numbers decrease also?
Since there seems to be a correlation between poverty and abortions

There is a correlation between how much one values life and whether or not the new life comes to term.
Your argument shifts the focus from abortion to inequality.
If you want to have a discussion about inequality that is fine. No need to integrate the 2 issues unless you are trying to confuse the issue.

 

[ZNP]

How does not having children you can't afford increase poverty?
I don't see it

Quite simple really, abortion is simply a critical component for free sex and fornication lifestyle.

Science shows that you if you can get teenagers to have multiple sexual partners they won't bond with anyone, hence more likely to get divorced and divorce is what leads to poverty.

So they do many things to encourage promiscuous behavior on TV, movies, coed schools, no after school programs in the inner city, hence no supervised kids for 3-4 hours, sex ed, etc. But you need abortion to really make this feasible.

 

[ZNP]

This is a radical new way to look at the world. Abortion is mercy, Slavery is actually charity, domestic abuse is really just a free education, and of course we could go on with the radical new definitions for pedophilia, and many other more explicit words, but that would get censored on this site.

Proverbs 12:10 the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel.

 

[XavierJesusLovesIndia]

This is from liberal politico: "In 2020, Poland became the first nation in nearly 15 years to buck the liberalizing trend around the globe and roll back abortion rights. Two years later, when the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in Dobbs struck down Roe and 50-plus years of legal precedent vanished, the United States became the second ...

When abortion was delegated to the Tribunal, the panel’s October 2020 decision was no surprise: Abortion on the grounds of fetal abnormality would be banned, partly on the basis that a right to life was already enshrined in the Polish constitution.

Abortion numbers plummeted by 90 percent." https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/11/07/poland-america-abortion-politics-00065416 So much for the liberal idea that Laws against Abortion will not reduce Abortions.

Further documented in the link: https://notesfrompoland.com/2022/07...s-90-in-polands-first-year-of-near-total-ban/

"Only 107 legal abortions were carried out in Poland, a country of 40 million people, in 2021, the first year of a near-total ban on terminating pregnancies. And the majority of those are likely to have taken place in the 27 days before the new rules came into force in late January. The new figures, published by the Rzeczpospolita newspaper, mean that 2021 saw a 90% decline in the number of abortions, which in the previous three years had averaged 1,087 annually."

 

[Dude653]

No, Planned Parenthood is the exact same organization. They are still practicing eugenics, still killing the innocent. Your argument of poverty is the very excuse Sanger used for sterelization that turned into abortion. There is no "allegedly" she was a racist, her closest friends were racists and we have books that she wrote that can be read today. She spoke at KKK women's meetings. There is no doubt. Germany is not murdering Jews today, Planned Parenthood is still aborting and "ridding" the world of minorities, Sangers ideals have never changed, never stopped.

No one is being forcefully sterilized in america. That's not happening... they may have been happening in the 50s and 60s but it's not happening now so it's irrelevant

Also for the 15 millionth time, no woman in America is being forced to abort her child so the genociding black people argument fails

 

[Dude653]

Quite simple really, abortion is simply a critical component for free sex and fornication lifestyle.

Science shows that you if you can get teenagers to have multiple sexual partners they won't bond with anyone, hence more likely to get divorced and divorce is what leads to poverty.

So they do many things to encourage promiscuous behavior on TV, movies, coed schools, no after school programs in the inner city, hence no supervised kids for 3-4 hours, sex ed, etc. But you need abortion to really make this feasible.

Ok.. but I don't see how forcing mothers to have babies they can't afford helps either

 

[Dude653]

But let's just be realistic here abstinence only is not something that's going to happen in reality so I think the best we can do is encourage contraception which is usually free at the health department

 

[ZNP]

Ok.. but I don't see how forcing mothers to have babies they can't afford helps either

Well then if you can't see that at least you can see the connection between poverty and abortion and you agree that reducing poverty is a good goal.

We know how to greatly reduce poverty.

1. Graduate from High School

2. Don't have children out of wedlock.

3. Don't get married until you have a full time job.

Instead of filling HS hallways with posters about how college helps you increase your net worth over a lifetime (these posters are really misleading) why not fill the halls with posters about how having kids out of wedlock makes you poor.

Further points

1. Single parents and poverty is directly related to women in poverty. However, now that we have DNA tests I expect you will see a more equitable distribution of the poverty with the men also becoming broke. That needs to be explained to kids.

2. Get rid of Coed HS.

3. Get rid of the sexual content on the internet that kids see from a young age. The solution is simple. Any site that has explicit content must have a rating in link. Then parents can buy filters that will prevent their kids computer from seeing any of that. Also this filter must be put on phones as well. Also, you need to be able to control filters at the router. We have the technology, all we need is for the enforcement to become serious. Big fines for anyone violating the protocol and easy ability for parents to put on these filters.

 

[ZNP]

But let's just be realistic here abstinence only is not something that's going to happen in reality so I think the best we can do is encourage contraception which is usually free at the health department

OK, if you want to be realistic, make sure kids cannot access websites with pornographic material, get rid of Coed Hight schools, and pay for after school activities so that all High school kids are busy until 6 pm.

 

[Dude653]

OK, if you want to be realistic, make sure kids cannot access websites with pornographic material, get rid of Coed Hight schools, and pay for after school activities so that all High school kids are busy until 6 pm.

The only thing that can really be done about access to pornography is for parents to put blocks on adult contents on their kids devices
Segregating students between boys and girls seems a bit extreme
And before anyone strong hands me, I'm not encouraging promiscuous behavior but what I am saying is that it's pretty clear that teaching apps in this only is not working so we need to give them access to contraception

 

[kaylagrl]

they may have been happening in the 50s and 60s but it's not happening now so it's irrelevant

No may have, it's fact.

Also for the 15 millionth time, no woman in America is being forced to abort her child so the genociding black people argument fails

Take out the offending word. Planned Parenthood is using false arguments and propaganda to brain wash women into aborting their children which will wipe out the black race in America if they continue at this pace. Planned Parenthood are murdering the unborn. And they are using the eugenics model to do it.

 

[kaylagrl]

The only thing that can really be done about access to pornography is for parents to put blocks on adult contents on their kids devices
Segregating students between boys and girls seems a bit extreme
And before anyone strong hands me, I'm not encouraging promiscuous behavior but what I am saying is that it's pretty clear that teaching apps in this only is not working so we need to give them access to contraception

They have condoms in most schools, they have been handing them out since I was in high school, putting them on bananas. So that track hasn't worked so far.

 

[kaylagrl]

Ok.. but I don't see how forcing mothers to have babies they can't afford helps either

Now it's my turn, who is forcing mothers to have babies?!

 

[Dude653]

Now it's my turn, who is forcing mothers to have babies?!

Because if she is forced to carry the baby the term that is forcing her to have a baby she can't afford
But like I said if we encourage contraception maybe we will see fewer pregnancies

 

[Dude653]

Also getting rid of coed schools is not really a solution either because they're still going to socialize on social media and meet up after school
So that would be kind of pointless