Becomes Trump a dictator?
- Thread starter wolfwint
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
No no no translation is: Trump is going to win for the 3rd time because you liberals have no identity, are confused, full of TDS and really have no strategy on how to defeat Trump besides raging against him without realizing that you're making him more popular.
I know that this is a complicated translation for you which you may not understand but just saying it for clarification.
I know that this is a complicated translation for you which you may not understand but just saying it for clarification.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, who Trump has been feuding with and said this week he’s considering firing, has a 37% approval rating, beneath the lowest approval ratings for the previous three federal reserve chairs, but above his 36% average approval rating in 2023, Gallup found.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarado...sapprove-of-trump--and-powell-in-latest-poll/
What until the tariffs take effect his popularity will soar!
I've made multiple attempts to have a reasonable conversation with you and have asked clarifying questions because that's how a conversation works.
If your point is that the left tends to be unreasonable, I've already conceded that point about 52 billion times
Maybe you were just being hyperbolic about the MS-13 and the horses being women thing. But no way of knowing since you refuse to answer clarifying questions.
If your point is that the left tends to be unreasonable, I've already conceded that point about 52 billion times
Maybe you were just being hyperbolic about the MS-13 and the horses being women thing. But no way of knowing since you refuse to answer clarifying questions.
Wait wait wait ... these were the polls that said that Hillary was going to shatter that glass ceiling right?
You're hilarious.
You're hilarious.
And if you noticed there is always about a margin of error, you ever study regression analysis or any type of statistical analysis "no" you say, well then that explains it.
Same tactic you used with @Dude653.
-
1
- Show all
Yeah, I never made that assertion about Hilary.
And if you noticed there is always about a margin of error, you ever study regression analysis or any type of statistical analysis "no" you say, well then that explains it.
Same tactic you used with @Dude653.
And if you noticed there is always about a margin of error, you ever study regression analysis or any type of statistical analysis "no" you say, well then that explains it.
Same tactic you used with @Dude653.
This is about the legitimacy and the accuracy of polls which are biased.
That's what this is about !
Polls which didn't match the reality of elections because journalism is dead.
No you haven't. You've dodged my question every time.
The post you reference was about Trump policies. And then you said something about people saying MS-13 are good people and that horses can be women.
I asked you about 947 times how those two claims are relevant to that post and you still have not answered my question
The post you reference was about Trump policies. And then you said something about people saying MS-13 are good people and that horses can be women.
I asked you about 947 times how those two claims are relevant to that post and you still have not answered my question
Yes, this is the part that you can't understand, which is an observation based on your conversations with others too when they try to point out things to you.
You simply don't process them or are unaware of them.
Your "questions" are merely confusion on your part since you can't understand the initial point.
You simply don't process them or are unaware of them.
Your "questions" are merely confusion on your part since you can't understand the initial point.
Okay so maybe we're at least getting closer to a real conversation.
The topic was someone comparing Trump to Hitler and I said I don't think he will genocide anyone but I think he uses similar rhetoric like the media is bad, everyone's lying, these people are destroying the country, only I can fix it. Etc
Then you countered with people are claiming MS-13 are good people and that horses can be women.
Can you provide a citation of anyone making those two claims?
The topic was someone comparing Trump to Hitler and I said I don't think he will genocide anyone but I think he uses similar rhetoric like the media is bad, everyone's lying, these people are destroying the country, only I can fix it. Etc
Then you countered with people are claiming MS-13 are good people and that horses can be women.
Can you provide a citation of anyone making those two claims?
When you said people were claiming that MS-13 are good people, I was assuming you were probably talking about the one dude who's been in the news for the past few weeks
If he is indeed MS-13 then let him rot in prison but he didn't get his due process
Trump and his administration openly defied a supreme court order
If he is indeed MS-13 then let him rot in prison but he didn't get his due process
Trump and his administration openly defied a supreme court order
Well, why would you assume that when you yourself started the comment with a generality?
Because if you did, i would pull a page from the liberal school of thought and say: SOURCE?
Which in itself is a dumb path to follow anyway since sources today are nothing but politicized opinions and it's up to the person to say the essence of the understanding of the situation after discerning all the show talking points from both sides.
The essence of the current situation is again very simple as i've said before.
Trump is here because the left is no longer in reality and it's borderline lunacy.
So what can we learn from this?
We can learn that you can have different layers of expression in order to have a normal conversation.
Here are some high level points:
* Try to avoid comparing anything (including Trump) to Hitler. That's a bad move usually.
* If you acknowledge that Trump is here because the left is worse, try to add that in your argument so people can see that you're being reasonable and then you can discuss in gentleman-fashion the finer points of whatever you'd like to discuss.
* Try to provide some data, while also acknowledging that data is not always accurate. This shows maturity in your understanding.
* Try to avoid one-liners you give to others so when you receive them yourself, you don't confuse them with "trolling".
So in general try to be more balanced in the conversation, in order to have a normal conversation.
Because if you did, i would pull a page from the liberal school of thought and say: SOURCE?
Which in itself is a dumb path to follow anyway since sources today are nothing but politicized opinions and it's up to the person to say the essence of the understanding of the situation after discerning all the show talking points from both sides.
The essence of the current situation is again very simple as i've said before.
Trump is here because the left is no longer in reality and it's borderline lunacy.
So what can we learn from this?
We can learn that you can have different layers of expression in order to have a normal conversation.
Here are some high level points:
* Try to avoid comparing anything (including Trump) to Hitler. That's a bad move usually.
* If you acknowledge that Trump is here because the left is worse, try to add that in your argument so people can see that you're being reasonable and then you can discuss in gentleman-fashion the finer points of whatever you'd like to discuss.
* Try to provide some data, while also acknowledging that data is not always accurate. This shows maturity in your understanding.
* Try to avoid one-liners you give to others so when you receive them yourself, you don't confuse them with "trolling".
So in general try to be more balanced in the conversation, in order to have a normal conversation.
-
1
-
1
- Show all