This is totally incorrect. Pastors by definition are elders and elders must be married men with children, according to Scripture.
Show me where the Bible
defines elders as pastors. That's church tradition. Historically, they were called presbuteros-->presters-->priests. The English and Germans called the Old Testament descendants of Aaron 'priests' or something similar, also. This is probably because the Anglo-Saxons evangelized some of the Germans back when they spoke a dialect of the same language during the Anglo-Saxon mission and left them Old English church vocabulary. 'Priest' in English and the German equivalent were messy words for that reason.
Geneva during the Reformation apparently called their church leaders 'pastors'-- or that is how it translated into English when the Scotts took the city-church-government model of Geneva and expanded it into a national church system. The city councilmen 'elder' position was turned into a national church position in Scotland, so they ended up with 'pastors' and 'elders.', with the verses about 'elders' in the Bible applying to the 'pastors', initially, and the verse about 'governments' applying to their elders.
The Bible iteself does not define pastors as elders. In the Old Testament, prophets, priests, and kings were all pastors. In the New Testament, there is a Greek verb form that can be translated 'pastor'. It is closely related to 'poimen' which is translated shepherd or pastor. We see this when Paul commands the elders of the church in Ephesus to pastor the church of God in Acts 20, or when Peter commands the elders to pastor the flock of God in I Peter 5. But we also see Paul defending his own right to live of the Gospel and saying, "Who pastors a flock and does not drink of the milk of the flock."
But there is no scripture that conclusively argues that all pastors are elders of the church. Pastors and teachers are gifts to the church. If you have the gift, you may not be an overseer if you do not fulfill the lifestyle requirements laid out in scripture.
Commanded celibacy is a doctrine of devils. All the apostles were married (as Paul tells us) and Paul may have been a widower (rather than a celibate). But Paul encouraged the younger widows to marry, bear children, and manage their houeseholds.
Celibacy is required of the unmarried. If Paul were a widower, he would have been celibate until he married again.
This is an interesting passage:
I Timothy 5
11 But the
younger widows refuse: for when they have begun to wax wanton against Christ, they will marry;
12 Having damnation, because they have
cast off their first faith.
13 And withal they learn to be idle, wandering about from house to house; and not only idle, but tattlers also and busybodies, speaking things which they ought not.
14 I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully.
We may have to guess at the context here. It could be concern about marrying pagans and leaving the faith. Or maybe, in order to be on the list, some widows had to committed to be celibate, and some of them abandoned their commitment and married, so Paul just recommended marriage for young widows across the board. Paul was favorable toward celibacy in I Corinthians 7 also. I think the RCC ran wild with the idea, but many Protestants are too far on the opposite extreme of opposing it or else ignore the idea.