Excellent last thread for me. I feel a little guilty for staying up this late as I usually do. Such a nice evening though.
@Tinkerbell725 I take issue with footnotes. They are distracting but at the same time have been useful as well. The only thing that I can recall learning from a footnote that I think is pretty fun is why the little town that Lot fled to was Named Zoar (small I think). Just so generic. This is a blink and you miss it town so we shall name it small. I have a KJV that I got at a thrift store because I wanted an extra but in places half of it is footnotes and a bunch of other stuff. It's a study bible but I find it irritating and not too useful because it almost makes one lazy with older English, and it feels a tiny bit like spoon-feeding so it's just my "car copy".
@GdaxBbb I'm glad I saw someone else say this because it's been a while. Consider when the Lord opened Hagar's eyes and she saw a well. This is a frequent experience and when I'm frustrated and missing something and I feel like I should read in a particular place I am inclined to be more voracious for this reason, because it is highly likely that my eyes weren't opened to it when I read it the first time and so the excuse "I've already read that" Doesn't apply or "I already know that"...Quote it then...Oh alas, I cannot. So...read it again. and again. and again.
For this reason I don't memorize scripture the normal way. Precept upon precept can't be memorized in the traditional sense. How could you when there are certain things you don't get until decades later? So I go for a more randomized approach.
Do I think I've read all the way through it? I can honestly say I don't know for certain. "Actually" read it through cover to cover breathing each word in and meditating on it day and night? That's quite the claim.
I took OT survey in the 9th grade and we had to read each book and write journals on it. Some of them I skimped on, some I skimmed. I've "scanned" it all. That I can say with much more confidence.
Somewhere around the 9th grade I recall reading each of the gospels at least once in a short period of time. I think it was the same day or the weekend. I was consistently searching a lot of my life so I'd be amazed if I hadn't read all of the NT. I would say I've read it fully but somehow the OT is more firmly in my mind.
Every time there is some book by book study or read through in a year or something I shy away from it. I haven't a clue as to why but I will think on it. I guess because each day my appetite is different. Certain sections I would skim one day and feast on the next. Even when I have multiple "erudite" days in a row and endure a sequential study I usually only make it through a book.
Such an interesting thing to think about and it's cool to have a topic on it. Usually when I bring it up, I don't get much discourse but I have listened to pastors and preachers over the years mention it and that's encouraging.
I would be remiss if I didn't mention there are days when I don't want to read. Where it's a chore and an irritating compulsion. I don't think you "have" to read every day. Mediating on the word doesn't require reading. I'm actually considering breaking that habit more forcefully by switching things up through more creative methods. There are times where it was almost like a checklist before I slept but still feels good to have checked. Idk, it's hard to define and I'm wondering if anyone has had this crop up.
I guess a good way to describe this is by comparing scripture reading to brushing teeth. It is compulsory for good oral hygiene but thorough brushing. Is a quick 10 second brush effective? Is overbrushing counterproductive? Are there alternative methods of oral hygiene that are equally as effective? Can certain foods be avoided and simple hydration be effective? I suppose more exploration of this analogy might serve but it has me thinking.
Somehow I continue to be long-winded today. It's been a lifelong thing since around the time I started to read (although I do not distinctly recall it being the first thing I read) I'll try and remember...my earliest memories of reading were hooked on phonics and while I did read it back then I had to be encouraged often.
Funny story though, I did "cheat read" before I could read in order to impress my mother and whomever else I was with (I think it was my Grandma) I was with my Father's mother and husband (who have titles as well
) and I asked what a particular sign said. They told me "Big lots" so I logged it away intentionally, so that when I was later with my mother I could pretend. "Look that sign says Big lots" and they were so impressed...I told them of course that I didn't actually read it and explained but it was a bit persnickety and I still giggle a bit at the memory. I presume I felt guilty and told them because it felt like lying (I told on myself often), but looking back it's useful in gauging children.