I don't believe Jesus is SDA, not as a man, and not as the Word. I didn't use quote's from religious man, nor do I depend on the internet for my understanding. I am showing you from scriptures how your statement that "Jesus doesn't mention the Sabbath in the New Testament" is untrue.
You may somehow have been convinced that any reference from God in the Bible regarding His Sabbath, is "SDA propaganda". And you may actually believe this. The scriptures I posted are not from SDA as you preach, but from the "Lord of the Sabbath".
Well, you have some things really messed up in your mind Dan. Jesus is not SDA, nor did He participate in SDA Propaganda, at least as I see the Scriptures.
And regarding the Feast's He created for us to walk in, you preach they are Jewish, but Jesus, as the Word, tells differently;
Lev. 23:
2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them,
Concerning the feasts of the LORD, which ye shall proclaim
to be holy convocations,
even these are my feasts.
So according to the Bible, The Holy Days are His, not the Jews as you preach. And the Sabbath is His as well, not SDA as you preach. And if we "Believe on His Word" Paul also agree with him.
1 Cor. 5:6 Your glorying
is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?
7 Purge out therefore the old leaven,
that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:
8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened
bread of sincerity and truth.
So when confronted by the Popes religious preaching, and with your religious preaching, I am always placed in the position to choose between what the Word of God teaches, and what you guys preach. But the Bible also warns about this as well.
Col. 2:
8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world,
and not after Christ.
If you believe the Word which became Flesh was a Jewish member of SDA, it really doesn't matter what you preach. But if you reject these "Rudiments of the World and traditions of men" and Glorify God AS GOD, then the understanding is different. I don't care what this religious man does or that religious man. You are the one who must deflect, you are the one defending your preaching. I am simply posting scriptures and considering what they say apart from religious man.
I agree 100%. As Paul warned earlier, "beware of man". Let no man judge you in your willful obedience to the Word which became Flesh. these are from the Christ, not the Catholic Church or SAD, your religion, or any tradition soaked religion of the world.
18 Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels,
intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind,
As far as the scriptures go, we are to choose God's Ways over the religious ways of man. Do you not believe this?
Well I have learned to go to the Scriptures you refer to and look at them because you have a horrible custom of injecting your own religious traditions into them.
Heb. 7:
11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (
for under it the people received the law,) what further need
was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
12 For the priesthood being changed,
there is made of necessity a change also of the law.
So this is the part you posted. What did the Scriptures say this "change of the Law" was?
13 For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth
to another tribe, of which no man
gave attendance at the altar.
14 For
it is evident that
our Lord sprang out of Juda; of
which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood.
Who was the only Tribe that could partake of the Priesthood according to the Covenant God made with Israel? Was it not Levi? Was Levi not in charge of the Sanctuary and the atonement of sins? What was part of the New Covenant? "For I will forgive their sins". But this is a "Work" of the Priesthood. How can Jesus, from Judah, become a High Priest that was to be performed by Levites only?
"For the priesthood being changed,
there is made of necessity a change also of the law."
So the "LAW" dictating who could became a "Priest" had to be changed, and was. Just like He Promised in Jer. 31.
How is this not true?