Why is praying in tongues necessary?
- Thread starter TheLearner
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
No, Garee. Acts 10 shows that some Gentiles spoke in tongues when the Holy Spirit fell on them. They were in the presence of Christians (who were formerly Jews), and of other Gentiles who were saved at the same moment.
There was nobody present who had "no faith". There was nobody present who refused "to believe in the authority of as it (sic) is written".
Your view doesn't make sense.
There was nobody present who had "no faith". There was nobody present who refused "to believe in the authority of as it (sic) is written".
Your view doesn't make sense.
-
2
- Show all
Nobody or just you ?
Are you agreeing with me that the sign confirms those who do not believe God and it has to do with words that have a clear understanding. or are you saying they can be sounds without clear understanding and therefore widen the authority of prophecy, the word of God..
What does the law of tongues confirm ?
Are you agreeing with me that the sign confirms those who do not believe God and it has to do with words that have a clear understanding. or are you saying they can be sounds without clear understanding and therefore widen the authority of prophecy, the word of God..
What does the law of tongues confirm ?
Whats is the (sic) in "to believe in the authority of as it (sic) is written". thanks?
Acts 10 shows that some Gentiles spoke in tongues when the Holy Spirit fell on them giving them the faith of Christ needed to believe in a God not seen previously having no faith that alone comes from hearing as it is written.
They were in the presence of Christians (who were formerly unconverted Jews), and of other Gentiles who were saved at the same moment of hearing the gospel they believed God and prophesied the word of God in the own language while other heard it in their own.
While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which "heard the word". And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?Acts10;44-47
Acts 10 shows that some Gentiles spoke in tongues when the Holy Spirit fell on them giving them the faith of Christ needed to believe in a God not seen previously having no faith that alone comes from hearing as it is written.
They were in the presence of Christians (who were formerly unconverted Jews), and of other Gentiles who were saved at the same moment of hearing the gospel they believed God and prophesied the word of God in the own language while other heard it in their own.
While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which "heard the word". And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?Acts10;44-47
Oh gosh, I have to say that some of the responses of this read are very entertaining and comical! Lol!
It is like watching an Abott and Costello skit......”Who’s on First?”
It is like watching an Abott and Costello skit......”Who’s on First?”
-
2
-
1
- Show all
It shows that the error (grammatical, spelling, word choice, or similar) was in the original quoted and is not an error on the part of the person doing the quoting.
You have an amazing ability to convolute the simple. Acts 10 shows that some Gentiles believed the gospel and were filled with the Holy Spirit, the evidence of which was that they spoke in tongues.
Yes.
No. It says they spoke in tongues. It says nothing about them prophesying. It says nothing about "their own language". It says nothing about "other (sic) heard it in their own". You're mixing up Acts 2 with Acts 10.
You keep quoting Deuteronomy 4:2 and Revelation 22:18-19, but you aren't follow them yourself. Read what the text of Acts 10:34-48 actually says, and don't inject your own words into it so that it fits your view.
You have an amazing ability to convolute the simple. Acts 10 shows that some Gentiles believed the gospel and were filled with the Holy Spirit, the evidence of which was that they spoke in tongues.
Yes.
No. It says they spoke in tongues. It says nothing about them prophesying. It says nothing about "their own language". It says nothing about "other (sic) heard it in their own". You're mixing up Acts 2 with Acts 10.
You keep quoting Deuteronomy 4:2 and Revelation 22:18-19, but you aren't follow them yourself. Read what the text of Acts 10:34-48 actually says, and don't inject your own words into it so that it fits your view.
-
1
- Show all
I don’t know is on third base! Lol!
-
1
-
1
- Show all
