There is a big difference between "healing miracles" as direct answers to prayer (or even simply by God's grace) and the gift of healers. If the gift of healers was current, every church (even the non-charismatic) would have at least one healer. And the healers would simply go to the hospitals and apply their gifts. The fact is that there are no healers and faith healers are generally charlatans. But God does heal people all the time.
Please cite a long list of "all the time" healings by faith. Where does scripture promise a minimum of one "healer"? The Holy Spirit assigns gifts, but for anyone to exercise that gift will require faith in that person to operate in it, as well as faith in a congregation to receive healing by faith. None of us should expect to force healing miracles above what Jesus was willing or able to perform.
You judge people submitting to exercise of spiritual gifts as "charlatans"? I suppose you are critical of preachers, evangelists, etc. too?
Now this is an entirely different matter. If there were genuine healers around, they would simply lay hands on the sick and they would be healed. But James talks about the prayer of faith because God already anticipated that there would be no healers in the churches. So it is not elders doing the healing as miracle workers, but the prayer of faith making healing a reality. Big difference.
Did you notice the gift of EVANGELISTS as a current gift? Evangelists are indeed ambassadors, as are many others. But evangelists and apostles are not the same gift. There are only 12 apostles of the Lamb according to Scripture, and they were apostles because of specific criteria.
Don't forget that it is modern charismatic and Pentecostal theology that has undermined all the other gifts. I have been saying what your OP says for a long time.
There are so many gifts, yet Pentecostal denominations focus on one- speaking in tongues. (Ok, maybe the healing thing, too!) Something, let's face it, if you look at it historically soon after Jesus died, (before the fall of Jerusalem, anyway!) passed away forever. If it had been important, it would not have disappeared 20 centuries ago!
People should start looking at the gift list, and praying God will show them their gift, so they can walk in it. I figured out my husband's gift was "helps!" I got him on the building committee, and he exercises the gift all the time with our church, with family and neighbours. What a blessing he isn't sitting around all day babbling in fake tongues, but actually doing something, quietly, for the kingdom of God!
I have some of those gifts, not going to fight about it! This is not about me! However, I seem to be doing a lot of exhorting lately. One on one. It never hit me till I looked at the list.
Of course, I don't agree with 2 small things you said, but they are so small, and I want to focus on the big picture. The Bible is SO clear that tongues was a sign of the birth of the church. A sign accompanied by flames of fire and a rushing wind. A great day, an amazing day! But finished a long time ago!
Thanks for starting this thread! I know some will not like it, as we have seen. But the truth has to be made known![/QUOTE]
So you have attended enough pentecostal church services to be an expert on judging them? I have attended many and find most do not put a focus on the gift of tongues. Most I know of actually preach the blood, body, death and resurrection of Christ, and always observe the Last Supper communion as commanded by Jesus. I rarely enjoy that observance in typical mainline no0n-pentecostal/charismatic worship services. They might observe once a month or year.
So you prefer a heavily edited version that deletes pertinent facts that lead folks to Christ? This is similar to the Thomas Jefferson "Jefferson Bible" version that left out miracles and other supernatural facts.