Simply wrong, Garee. The P's and S's knew the written law better than you or I. The problem was that they rejected the Spirit behind the law. The written law was not their nemesis.
Yes they knew it so well that they apposed it as there nemesis. Joining forces to destroy the foundation of faith as
it is written alone.
Neither can they prove the things whereof they now accuse me. But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:Acts 24:13-14
The law of the fathers worship the fathers in place of God. : They worship the fathers seen as if they were our father in heaven not seen(.no faith). Rather than again like Paul worships the one God
of the fathers (not as) they make men gods (multitude) in the likeness of men (Acts14) .Judaism in a nut shell as those who would rather obey the commandments of men seen and not God, as our one Father. . not seen
You as it seems are simply following another kind of mediator other than all things written in the law and the prophets .The reforming authority in any generation.
If they did know it better as you say rather than differently with a false zeal. Then they would of got under all things written in the law and the prophets (sola scriptura) rather than calling it "heresy" and the law of the fathers the higher authority as they did in Acts 24. shot there own self in the foot destroying the gospel
Walking by sight after what the eyes see murdering the misperceived, mis-informed law of the fathers which again made all things written in the law and the prophets without effect. No man can serve two teaching masters in that way .
Different interpretation authorities produce different results.
Sola scriptura is a Latin term from the 15th century reformation. Using it in this context is simply incorrect.
Circumcision was not changed into an oral tradition. You're also overusing the phrase, "bloody husband".
I am using bloody husband as it is used in respect the suffering of our savior. . preached beforehand through ceremonial laws .It represent Jesus the first born our bloody husband .Not a way of confirming someone was filled with something as a sign and wonder.
Using sola scriptura as all things written in the law and the prophets or as it is described in Isaiah 28 (10 For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little
Circumcision a cereimional law a sign of the first born Christ. It was changed into a work righteousness law with those who follow another law other than that of our father in heaven.