I think scholars say that Job was either a gentile patriarch contemporary of Abraham, or lived close to the time of Abraham- if that's the case, Job could have either run into Melchizedek, and/ or God could have had a somewhat similar relationship to Job, like he did with Abraham.
What do you mean? Of course it's in the scripture.
If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong; Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days; the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother; Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you
Yes, really.
. But Jesus never forbade the death penalty to be carried out lawfully. There was nothing wrong with the law- except it doesn't work as a covenant to save people. But that doesn't mean that it was bad, or wrong. On the contrary it is and holy and from God.
But it sounds to me like you think the Gospel is a replacement for all law and government, but that's not what it is- it replaces moses' law as the covenant between God and his people.
Precisely.
Moses' law came from Jehova. Jesus IS JEHOVA. He never changed. Because the law is not inconsistent with the Gospel. It is abolished AS A COVENANT, because it was never going to be sufficient to save; but Jesus never taught that Moses' law was wrong. Insufficient but never wrong.
Jesus didn't have a problem with Moses' law. It was his law.
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
It was the faithless, merciless, Pharisees exercising poor judgement is what he really had a problem with.
“the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother; Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you”
lol that doesn’t support what you said are you saying the judges didn’t follow the judgements written in the law ? And if they did it would make them stupid ?
“You really think the elders at the city gate were supposed to just be blindly and stupidly putting people to death without asking questions? Come on...”
lol no I said. I thing like that . Your saying if they kept the commandments of Moses that made them stupid so basically it’s stupid to do what they get law said ?
if you were under the law and thought you didn’t have to carry out Gods judgements that would be stupid for sure
“And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife,
the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.”
Leviticus 20:10 KJV
What I said is
the law is not an option to follow or not follow it’s exactly what’s written in it. There was no judge who invented his own judgements under the law lol 😀
“For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written,
Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.”
Galatians 3:10 KJV
do you understand what makes up the book of the law that’s the ey had to continue doing it all ?
“There was
not a word of all that Moses commanded,
which Joshua read not before all the congregation of Israel, with the women, and the little ones, and the strangers that were conversant among them.”
Joshua 8:35 KJV
that’s thier law everything Moses commanded them, and it in no way gives the option of not carrying out all of its ordinances and commands that’s uninformed.
They are
commanded to keep
everything written in it not “ if you think it’s a good idea then obey but if you don’t go ahead and not worry about it lol
that’s funny if anyone knows the law and it’s condition.
“I mean... You can't just go around vigilante-like willy-nilly throwing rocks at people”
yeah not sure where you came up with That one must have confused my comment with another.
“But it sounds to me like you think the Gospel is a replacement for all law and government, but that's not what it is- it replaces moses' law as the covenant between God and his people.”
yep I sure do given Jesus Christ is lord of heaven and earth.
And it’s
not a replacement for the law of Moses
it is the fulfillment of the law and prophets promise that the messiah would come and give Gods true law of light and salvation
“
Hearken unto me, my people; and give ear unto me, O my nation:
for a law shall proceed from me, and I will make my judgment to rest for a light of the people. My righteousness is near; my salvation is gone forth, and mine arms shall judge the people; the isles shall wait upon me, and on mine arm shall they trust.”
Isaiah 51:4-5 KJV
Israel’s covenant the one through Moses is very much still here it’s just a curse because they broke it like he said they would that’s why there’s a mosque on thier Temple Mount declaring “God has no son” it’s desolate now been fulfilled and the new covenant has come
But honestly I think I see a lot of wasted time and energy to continue with you in this one. Seems like one of those constant arguments that will go no where for either of us
but if you think the law was optional , you should study it a little more and come to the conclusion Paul did that you have to keep every word that’s written or it’s a curse.
also you should compare this that Moses said
“Ye have heard that it hath been said,
An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.”
Matthew 5:38-39 KJV
yeah those are the same for sure ☺️
anyways I’m gonna move on I see a waste of time and argument ahead