Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,826
527
113
Finally, Paul draws an analogy between the creation of Light in this physical world (Gen 1:3-5) and the spiritual New Creation whereby God shines his Light into his people's hearts to dispel the darkness,
So you disagree with @rogerg then about God only comparing spiritual things with spiritual? We can compare the spiritual world with the physical world and learn spiritual truths from physical things?
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,826
527
113
"God designed" parables, yes, and they part of scripture. But those weren't what I was referring to; I was referring to YOUR parables - parables that you constructed - non-biblical, humanistic parables based purely upon earthly things of your construct for demonstrating spiritual principles. I personally believe it a good idea to limit oneself to only those parables designated as such by scripture.

God tells us below that we should compare spiritual with spiritual. A scriptural parable has spiritual value.

[1Co 2:13, 14 KJV]
13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned.
That's one of the dumbest hermeneutics I have ever heard proposed.

God created the universe unlike the spiritual realm in every way apart from only those things mentioned specifically in scripture in a specifically parabolic genre?
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
7,200
2,868
113
You are correct if the Bible says: For grace and faith are ye saved; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God. Ignoring, avoiding or disregarding the words " by and through" gets one nowhere.
Sometimes a few words can make a big impact, your point is well made.
"Through faith"
The gift is salvation.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
4,167
698
113
God created the universe unlike the spiritual realm in every way apart from only those things mentioned specifically in scripture in a specifically parabolic genre?
Yes, they are apart - completely apart - and that is why God refers to them to as the new heavens and new earth - because they are unlike this world in every sense - apart, regarding their spiritual doctrine and truth amongst other things. The spiritual - the perfect -cannot be perceived, taught or learned by using a corrupted, sinful, satan controlled world as this one is, as a basis.
Since God chose to make known to us the distinction between the two in the verses you've chosen to discard, means you are blind to their truth - even treating them with distain - which is probably evidence that you remain that natural man described with the same verses, at least for now, incapable of comprehending things spiritual.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
4,167
698
113
So you disagree with @rogerg then about God only comparing spiritual things with spiritual? We can compare the spiritual world with the physical world and learn spiritual truths from physical things?
Seems to me that @Rufus was actually quoting a verse in that post, not manufacturing a parable.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
62,638
31,469
113
I don't think he understands the spiritual nature of that. 1cor2
That is a bit of an odd thing to say given how many completely disregard the differences between
the natural man and the spiritual man. You may be among them, too, but I know Roger definitely
is not, for he has an understanding many lack, and those many contradict Jesus on a regular basis.


The many who regularly contradict Jesus deny a plethora of other Scriptural verses as well.


Biblical truth concerning the natural man: The flesh craves what is contrary to the Spirit, and the Spirit what is contrary to the flesh. They are opposed to each other. The mind of the flesh is hostile to God: It does not submit to God’s law, nor can it do so. Flesh serves the law of sin. Good itself does not dwell in me.
:)
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
62,638
31,469
113
Okay, then enlighten me, I'm always ready to learn.
Heh, I doubt they can. They would probably just as soon tell you that the natural man can
receive and comprehend the spiritual things of God even though Scripture says otherwise.


That darkness loves the light. That a corrupt tree can bring forth good fruit. That the stony ground
of the natural man's uncircumcised heart is perfect for growing the fruit of faith. That the inherently
hostile-to-God mind will simply decide to believe that which is foolishness to them. Etc etc LOL
It is amazing how much gets overthrown for them generally speaking) to hold to their view.



Psalm 14:1-3; Job 15:16
 
Nov 17, 2015
4,187
983
113
That's one of the dumbest hermeneutics I have ever heard proposed.

God created the universe unlike the spiritual realm in every way apart from only those things mentioned specifically in scripture in a specifically parabolic genre?
Paul also uses many comparisons of spiritual things to earthly things, perhaps, he cannot comprehend the spiritual nature of parables. 1cor2
1 Cor. 3
3 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.

2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.
 
Nov 17, 2015
4,187
983
113
Yes agree, along with lumping the Good News into what Paul was addressing, which would be incorrect.
Here's the gospel that needs to be received. Understanding the spiritual nature of this is the need to receive it or believe it according to the scriptures. Believing the gospel saves, rejecting it condemns.
1 Cor. 15
15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;

2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.

3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;

4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
4,167
698
113
Heh, I doubt they can. They would probably just as soon tell you that the natural man can
receive and comprehend the spiritual things of God even though Scripture says otherwise.


That darkness loves the light. That a corrupt tree can bring forth good fruit. That the stony ground
of the natural man's uncircumcised heart is perfect for growing the fruit of faith. That the inherently
hostile-to-God mind will simply decide to believe that which is foolishness to them. Etc etc LOL
It is amazing how much gets overthrown for them generally speaking) to hold to their view.



Psalm 14:1-3; Job 15:16
Yup, that's what I'm kinda expecting, Magenta.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
7,200
2,868
113
Here's the gospel that needs to be received. Understanding the spiritual nature of this is the need to receive it or believe it according to the scriptures. Believing the gospel saves, rejecting it condemns.
1 Cor. 15
15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;

2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.

3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;

4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
I just want to add in context, there were people who going about stating that Jesus had not risen from the dead and Paul was reminding them that if Jesus had not risen from the dead then their belief was in vain.

They were saved, but were falling prey to false teachings because they were being persuaded by human reasoning... yet Paul is reminding them that they need to rely upon the spiritual understanding they have been given after their conversions.

Tiresome how Calvinists rip texts out of context. Very tiresome.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
62,638
31,469
113
Yup, that's what I'm kinda expecting, Magenta.
Since they lack the spiritual discernment to differentiate who and what the natural man is compared to
the spiritual man, it is understandable that they ascribe to one what only the other possesses, but it
makes them no less wrong in their thinking and beliefs. Still it is somewhat puzzling how such a huge
part of Scripture gets overlooked, denied, and swept under the rug. That guy that Scripture has so much
to say about in the Bible, the very reason Jesus came to save us, does not exist in their mind sets.
 
Nov 17, 2015
4,187
983
113
I just want to add in context, there were people who going about stating that Jesus had not risen from the dead and Paul was reminding them that if Jesus had not risen from the dead then their belief was in vain.

They were saved, but were falling prey to false teachings because they were being persuaded by human reasoning... yet Paul is reminding them that they need to rely upon the spiritual understanding they have been given after their conversions.

Tiresome how Calvinists rip texts out of context. Very tiresome.
Yes, they play out of context.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
4,167
698
113
Since they lack the spiritual discernment to differentiate who and what the natural man is compared to
the spiritual man, it is understandable that they ascribe to one what only the other possesses, but it
makes them no less wrong in their thinking and beliefs. Still it is somewhat puzzling how such a huge
part of Scripture gets overlooked, denied, and swept under the rug. That guy that Scripture has so much
to say about in the Bible, the very reason Jesus came to save us, does not exist in their mind sets.
Yes, its huge and foundational to the whole gospel, yet apparently, invisible to them.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
62,638
31,469
113
Yes, its huge and foundational to the whole gospel, yet apparently, invisible to them.
Not only invisibly non-existent, but to that is added the belief that God is unfair to act unilaterally
in drawing us with loving kindness. I saw one such claim in another thread that she preferred not
to put God in a box, but that is exactly what they do. They are blind to their own folly, as well.
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
4,167
698
113
Not only invisibly non-existent, but to that is added the belief that God is unfair to act unilaterally
in drawing us with loving kindness. I saw one such claim in another thread that she preferred not
to put God in a box, but that is exactly what they do. They are blind to their own folly, as well.
And you know what happens when the blind leads the blind.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
62,638
31,469
113
And you know what happens when the blind leads the blind.
One mile of road, two miles of ditch. Many end up in the ditch.


Revelation 3:8; Luke 13:24 ~ Behold, I have placed before you an open door, which no one can shut. Make every effort to enter through the narrow door. For many, I tell you, will try to enter and will not be able.