I could say a lot reguarding this comment. But instead, how about you read this and connect the dots yourself
“The elders who rule well are to be considered worthy of double price, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching. For the Scripture says, “you shall not muzzle the ox while he is threshing,” and “The laborer is worthy of his wages.”” (1 Timothy 5:17–18)
“You yourselves also know, Philippians, that at the first preaching of the gospel, after I left Macedonia, no church shared with me in the matter of giving and receiving but you alone; for even in Thessalonica you sent a gift more than once for my needs. Not that I seek the gift itself, but I seek for the profit which increases to your account. But I have received everything in full and have an abundance; I am amply supplied, having received from Epaphroditus what you have sent, a fragrant aroma, an acceptable sacrifice, well-pleasing to God.” (Philippians 4:15–18)
View attachment 237777
(
1 Cor 9)
This principle of amply supplying our spiritual leaders (elders) can cause hindrances in the minds of some because they assume pastors do their work for the wrong reason, but it is absolutely Biblical.
To put it concisely,
elders should never ask to be amply paid, but they also shouldn't have to.
If a church fellowship is healthy and thriving, the elders are biblically qualified. So they are men of truth, passionate, caring for the flock, good stewards, holy, etc. They are worthy of the double price. Healthy churches are generous churches ("God loves a generous giver"). When the people are generous, it is not difficult to amply pay the elders with plenty left over to give to the needy and other ministries. When we pay them well, it enables them to do what they're called to do full-time. And that is the most profitable thing for you and I and the rest of the body in the local confregation.
The elders who rule well are to be considered worthy of double price, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching. For the Scripture says, “you shall not muzzle the ox while he is threshing,” and “The laborer is worthy of his wages.”” (1 Timothy 5:17–18)
yeah again the elders and teachers ect of those days weren’t receiving a paycheck so it makes sense they had to live and eat and if they were dedicated to the gospel and overseeing the church matters in those days they lived off the generosity of the church they fed spiritually.
my point is that today pastors already make a living and are paid by whatever institution employs them. I’m not interested in making a well off pastor richer I’d rather give to the poor among us like Jesus taught. If a pastor doesn’t make a wage we should give to them but I’m not in that situation my pastor has plenty.
“This principle of amply supplying our spiritual leaders (elders) can cause hindrances in the minds of some because they assume pastors do their work for the wrong reason, but it is absolutely Biblical.”
no I’m not saying Pastors shouldn’t receive a wage I’m saying now most of them are on the payroll in those days they weren’t. so their living depended on the people of the church providing what they needed.
pastors shouldn’t be made rich they should have what they need and give also to the poor among us themselves when they have plenty.
Pastors make a wage mostly these days im sure there are some who don’t and they should absolutely be supported by those they spiritually feed but I said that in my prior post. Pastors shouldn’t be made rich because they preach it was that they didn’t make a wage then and needed to live and have food.
if my pastor relied on tithes for food and rent I’d be the first to support him financially but that’s not the case in my church he has plenty and others have needs not met, which I choose to honor God that way according to Christ and his teachings about loving others in deed and truth.
You know how Paul and then gathered money ? Thy I didn’t keep it they supported the poor churches with the generously of the richer churches. They got what they needed also food and things but it wasn’t like today where they were looking to get richer and store up bank accounts.
So you have Paul who didn’t make any wage but the churches he fed supked his daily needs
“Notwithstanding ye have well done, that ye did communicate with my affliction. Now ye Philippians know also, that in the beginning of the gospel, when I departed from Macedonia, no church communicated with me as concerning giving and receiving, but ye only. For even in Thessalonica ye sent once and again unto my necessity. Not because I desire a gift: but I desire fruit that may abound to your account. But I have all, and abound: I am full, having received of Epaphroditus the things which were sent from you, an odour of a sweet smell, a sacrifice acceptable, wellpleasing to God.”
Philippians 4:14-18 KJV
that wasn’t tommake Paul rich it was to make sure he had what he needed to live and preach the gospel .
Then you have the richer churches goving to help the poorer churches
“Moreover, brethren, we do you to wit of the grace of God bestowed on the churches of Macedonia;
how that in a great trial of affliction the abundance of their joy and their deep poverty abounded unto the riches of their liberality.
…..but by an equality, that
now at this time your abundance may be a supply for their want, that their abundance also may be a supply for your want: that there may be equality: as it is written,
He that had gathered much had nothing over; and he that had gathered little had no lack. But thanks be to God, which put the same earnest care into the heart of Titus for you.”
2 Corinthians 8:1-2, 14-16 KJV
The church is about this principle regarding money and possessions
“And
all that believed were together, and had all things common; and
sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.”
Acts 2:44-45 KJV
not about making any one person rich but those with plenty helping those with less than enough so all are supplied. That’s at least what I believe. The world today has really misshaped things and a lot of people have wants to be rich themselves but no regard for those who have less than they need
really our worldly means are just a way to keep food on our table and help to keep food and clothes ect in the lives of the needy also. But the world is about making sure we have a lot stored up for our self