Any query into the Jewish demographics brings about instantaneous charges of "Pogrom Planning." So, much stays hidden, by design.
Anyway, the problem in answering a question on
"who the Jews are" is that they are not one people. They are really not even
a people, as we consider people's such as Anglo-Saxons of Europe, the African Negroes, or the Chinese of China. Now those are one people, descended from one main racial tribe.
With the so-called Jews of today this is not so. That is why you can't always tell a Jew by looking at him. But look at a Negro of Africa or a Chinese person of China, and you will have no difficultly identifying him. You might then say that a Black and a White may mix, and you can't always tell them apart; or, that a Chinese and a White may mix and you can't always tell what race they are. But that is exactly my point, when a Black and White mix, their children lose both races and become a new one, in the case of the Black/White they become Mulattos, in the case of the Chinese/White they become what many call Amerasian.
There are more technical terms for these racial divisions, but most research in that field has been quashed, and most older (more honest) studies on race have been censored and suppressed. Today, to study the racial differences in people or the differences in the races; or to even dare mention that the races are different and have different strengths and weaknesses; is tantamount to being a cross-burning racist. No PHD., no aspiring University professor, or hopeful-on-grant-money researcher, having spent 14 years in college to gain his position and esteem, is going to risk his career researching, documenting, and/or writing on topics that have become socially taboo. The truth be damned.
Now, the people of today who call themselves Jews have a long and winding road regarding their racial make-up. Which is exactly why the International Judaics are at the forefront of all efforts to dissolved racial bounds. It is not that they cared for the Negros' plight in the 1960's that they sparked the race riots and the "equality movement." It was just that they were using the Negroes as a surrogate to preserve themselves. They do the same thing with the Homosexual Agenda.
So, to say that a Jew is of, say,
this people; and then say that he is of
that people, would both be correct. A Jew
can be from Japheth, and from Cain, and from Esau, and from the Mongols, and from Ishmael, and from the Canaanites, etc.
If a particular Jewish person is of Esau many generations ago, and then she marries a Kenite; her child is of both Esau and Cain. Do you see my point? And this is why God told the Israelites not to intermarry with the other races in the land. And for the most part, Israel obeyed that. The ones didn't were cast off:
Ezra 10:1-8
10:1 Now when Ezra had prayed, and when he had confessed, weeping and casting himself down before the house of God, there assembled unto him out of Israel a very great congregation of men and women and children: for the people wept very sore.
2 And Shechaniah the son of Jehiel, one of the sons of Elam, answered and said unto Ezra, We have trespassed against our God, and have taken strange wives of the people of the land: yet now there is hope in Israel concerning this thing.
3 Now therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my lord, and of those that tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be done according to the law.
4 Arise; for this matter belongeth unto thee: we also will be with thee: be of good courage, and do it.
5 Then arose Ezra, and made the chief priests, the Levites, and all Israel, to swear that they should do according to this word. And they sware.
6 Then Ezra rose up from before the house of God, and went into the chamber of Johanan the son of Eliashib: and when he came thither, he did eat no bread, nor drink water: for he mourned because of the transgression of them that had been carried away.
7 And they made proclamation throughout Judah and Jerusalem unto all the children of the captivity, that they should gather themselves together unto Jerusalem;
8 And that whosoever would not come within three days, according to the counsel of the princes and the elders, all his substance should be forfeited, and himself separated from the congregation of those that had been carried away KJV
Continued on down to verse 44:
Ezra 10:44
44 All these had taken strange wives: and some of them had wives by whom they had children. KJV
What became of these children? They were not killed, they were driven out of Israel, forever relinquishing the promises of God to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob;
i.e., to Israel. The ones that did not obey, and who had children by the strange wives, went on to become the ancestors of many of today's so-called Jews.
Now perhaps you can understand why a Jew, truly desirous to be a full Jew, necessarily hates the Anglo-Saxon true Israel people? I think that people can understand that a thing is true if they can find some reason behind it. There is your reason--the Jews want to take the kingdom from the true Israelites. And for moment in time, at the end of time, they shall indeed accomplish this sin. Then Jesus Christ returns in the fury and wrath of God to execute His righteous judgments.
But they didn't stop mixing in the land of Canaan, nor in Assyria, nor in Babylon, nor in Persia, nor in Esau-mixed second-temple-period Judea; they kept right on mixing with everyone as they coursed through Asia, Africa, Russia, Europe properly, and to all the nether regions of this planet; cursed, rejected, from ghetto to ghetto, till they became strong enough to begin dominating this world. And they are very strong. They took the land of Israel in 1948 by intrigue and treachery from the Anglo-Saxon nation of England (who had mandate over it at the time [not the Palestinians, as is commonly and errantly suggested] Search Internet under search terms
Balfour Declaration, bearing in mind that the Rothschilds are a powerful bonafide card-carrying
Kenite family). And time is short away from when they will finally expel the Palestinians, scrape the temple mount of the Islamic blasphemies that sit on God's rock, and build the abomination of all abominations―antichrist's temple, the temple of satan―upon the very sockets and foundations of the Temple of God at Temple Mount, Jerusalem City, Israel. Then will the stones cry out! You shall live to see that day, my friends.
Back to the racially mixed so-called Jews of today: That is why you have Black Jews, Asian Jews, and yes, even some (though very few) blue eyed Jews, etc. But these last type are not Jews by blood, but rather by religion. Now, it would not be so important that Jews are racially mixed―had not the Jews claimed to be of pure descent from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Israel). Nobody debates over a Mulatto or Amerasian. Though they do not lie and say that they are something that they are not, and that by merit of being that something that they are not, we must give them
this or
that, because, "God pledged it to them." As is the case with the so-called spurious Jews of today.
This brings further difficulty to our study. One may be a Jew simply because he has accepted the religion of Judaism, regardless of his racial make-up. Yes,
Virginia, they have made it hard to exactly identify them, or as to what would even constitute an accurate criteria for such an identification. Let's allow the official Israeli Government's Ministry of Foreign Affairs to explain what I have just said. Perhaps it is even more shocking that it comes directly from them:
When asked the question,
"Who is Israel? - Who is a Jew?", the Israeli Government's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) unhesitatingly answered thus:
“The term Israel
ite is purely Biblical.
An Israel
i is a citizen of Israel, regardless of religion.
A
Jew is a person anywhere in the world born to a Jewish mother,
orconverted to
Judaism, who
is thus identified as a member of the Jewish people and religion.”
― Information Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Jerusalem; Feb, 1998.
Or, here is a candid moment of honesty from the Jew's own
Jewish Almanac:
"Strictly speaking,
it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew." Or to call a contemporary Jew [an] "Israelite," or a "Hebrew."
The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all, and contemporary Palestinians, by their own definition of the term "Palestinian," have to include Jews among their own people."
― The Jewish Almanac, Oct., 1980, page 3, Bantam Books, Inc. Under a headline entitled "A brief History of the Terms for Jew"
Every Jewish person is different, or better said: there are distinct subgroups within Jewry.