The Chosen
- Thread starter JohnDB
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
When the Greek New Testament was translated into Latin in the 4th Century this name was written as Iesus, an exact match to the Greek that it came from. The Latin letter "I" split into two letters, "I" and "J." Originally this was two different ways of writing the same letter. So the Iesus became Jesus, but they were both pronounced the same way. Years later, some cultures began using the "I" for the vowel sound and "J" for a "Y" sound. It was not until around 1500 AD that the letter J took on the "dg" sound we are familiar with today.
From: Hebrew.org https://www.ancient-hebrew.org- where-did-the-name-jesus
From: Hebrew.org https://www.ancient-hebrew.org- where-did-the-name-jesus
-
1
- Show all
Hebrews 4:8
New International Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.
New Living Translation
Now if Joshua had succeeded in giving them this rest, God would not have spoken about another day of rest still to come.
English Standard Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on.
Berean Study Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.
Berean Literal Bible
For if Joshua had given rest to them, He would not have spoken after this about another day.
King James Bible
For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.
New King James Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, then He would not afterward have spoken of another day.
New American Standard Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken of another day after that.
NASB 1995
For if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken of another day after that.
NASB 1977
For if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken of another day after that.
Amplified Bible
[This mention of a rest was not a reference to their entering into Canaan.] For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not speak about another day [of opportunity] after that.
Christian Standard Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.
Holman Christian Standard Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.
American Standard Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken afterward of another day.
Aramaic Bible in Plain English
For if Yeshua, son of Nun, had given them rest, he would not afterward have spoken of another day.
Contemporary English Version
If Joshua had really given the people rest, there would not be any need for God to talk about another day of rest.
Douay-Rheims Bible
For if Jesus had given them rest, he would never have afterwards spoken of another day.
Good News Translation
If Joshua had given the people the rest that God had promised, God would not have spoken later about another day.
International Standard Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken later about another day.
Literal Standard Version
for if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken after these things concerning another day;
New American Bible
Now if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken afterwards of another day.
NET Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken afterward about another day.
New Revised Standard Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not speak later about another day.
New Heart English Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken afterward of another day.
Weymouth New Testament
For if Joshua had given them the true rest, we should not afterwards hear God speaking of another still future day.
World English Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken afterward of another day.
Young's Literal Translation
for if Joshua had given them rest, He would not concerning another day have spoken after these things;
New International Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.
New Living Translation
Now if Joshua had succeeded in giving them this rest, God would not have spoken about another day of rest still to come.
English Standard Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on.
Berean Study Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.
Berean Literal Bible
For if Joshua had given rest to them, He would not have spoken after this about another day.
King James Bible
For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.
New King James Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, then He would not afterward have spoken of another day.
New American Standard Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken of another day after that.
NASB 1995
For if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken of another day after that.
NASB 1977
For if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken of another day after that.
Amplified Bible
[This mention of a rest was not a reference to their entering into Canaan.] For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not speak about another day [of opportunity] after that.
Christian Standard Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.
Holman Christian Standard Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.
American Standard Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken afterward of another day.
Aramaic Bible in Plain English
For if Yeshua, son of Nun, had given them rest, he would not afterward have spoken of another day.
Contemporary English Version
If Joshua had really given the people rest, there would not be any need for God to talk about another day of rest.
Douay-Rheims Bible
For if Jesus had given them rest, he would never have afterwards spoken of another day.
Good News Translation
If Joshua had given the people the rest that God had promised, God would not have spoken later about another day.
International Standard Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken later about another day.
Literal Standard Version
for if Joshua had given them rest, He would not have spoken after these things concerning another day;
New American Bible
Now if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken afterwards of another day.
NET Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken afterward about another day.
New Revised Standard Version
For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not speak later about another day.
New Heart English Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken afterward of another day.
Weymouth New Testament
For if Joshua had given them the true rest, we should not afterwards hear God speaking of another still future day.
World English Bible
For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken afterward of another day.
Young's Literal Translation
for if Joshua had given them rest, He would not concerning another day have spoken after these things;
Jesus’ name in English comes from the Latin Isus, which is a transliteration of the Greek Iesous,
which is a transliteration of the Aramaic name Yeshua, which comes from the Hebrew Yehoshua,
or Joshua. The name comes from the Hebrew verb yasha, which means “he saves,” and the proper name
“Ya,” which is short for the name Yahweh. Put together, Jesus’ name in its original languages means
“Yahweh saves” or “Yahweh is salvation.” source
What A Beautiful Name
Joshua is the original Hebrew form of the Greek name Jesus.
Meaning: Yah Saves, Yah Will Save, Yah Is Salvation
Etymology:
(1) יה (yah), the name of the Lord, and
(2) the verb ישע (yasha'), to save or deliver.
A shortened form of Joshua is the name Jeshua (ישוע). The New Testament
was written in ancient Greek, and Yeshua, an Aramaic short form of the
Hebrew name Yehoshua, was rendered as Iesous, which became Iesus
in Latin and Jesus in English. “God is deliverance.”
which is a transliteration of the Aramaic name Yeshua, which comes from the Hebrew Yehoshua,
or Joshua. The name comes from the Hebrew verb yasha, which means “he saves,” and the proper name
“Ya,” which is short for the name Yahweh. Put together, Jesus’ name in its original languages means
“Yahweh saves” or “Yahweh is salvation.” source
What A Beautiful Name
Joshua is the original Hebrew form of the Greek name Jesus.
Meaning: Yah Saves, Yah Will Save, Yah Is Salvation
Etymology:
(1) יה (yah), the name of the Lord, and
(2) the verb ישע (yasha'), to save or deliver.
A shortened form of Joshua is the name Jeshua (ישוע). The New Testament
was written in ancient Greek, and Yeshua, an Aramaic short form of the
Hebrew name Yehoshua, was rendered as Iesous, which became Iesus
in Latin and Jesus in English. “God is deliverance.”
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Jesus willingly laying down His life - which was the purpose of His incarnation - does
not absolve those who conspired against Him of their responsibility in the matter.
1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches
in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own people the same things those
churches suffered from the Jews who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out.
Jesus is the suffering servant; “he was pierced for our transgressions [and] he was crushed for
our iniquities” (Isaiah 53:5). Jesus had to die for our sins because “we like sheep have gone astray;
we have turned—every one—to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all”
(Isaiah 53:6). It was also the will of the Jews to have Jesus crucified. We’d all die in our sins
without a Savior, but this would have never happened if it was not the will of the Father.
“It was the will of the LORD to crush him; he has put him to grief” (Isaiah 53:10).
When Peter tried to talk Jesus out of going to the cross, Jesus rebuked Peter, saying,
“Get behind me, Satan! You are a hindrance to me. For you are not setting your mind
on the things of God, but on the things of man.” (Matt 16:23)
The Jews are responsible. The Romans are responsible. We are all responsible for the need
of Jesus to die for our sins. The beautiful thing about it is that God has taken responsibility.
not absolve those who conspired against Him of their responsibility in the matter.
1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches
in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own people the same things those
churches suffered from the Jews who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out.
Jesus is the suffering servant; “he was pierced for our transgressions [and] he was crushed for
our iniquities” (Isaiah 53:5). Jesus had to die for our sins because “we like sheep have gone astray;
we have turned—every one—to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all”
(Isaiah 53:6). It was also the will of the Jews to have Jesus crucified. We’d all die in our sins
without a Savior, but this would have never happened if it was not the will of the Father.
“It was the will of the LORD to crush him; he has put him to grief” (Isaiah 53:10).
When Peter tried to talk Jesus out of going to the cross, Jesus rebuked Peter, saying,
“Get behind me, Satan! You are a hindrance to me. For you are not setting your mind
on the things of God, but on the things of man.” (Matt 16:23)
The Jews are responsible. The Romans are responsible. We are all responsible for the need
of Jesus to die for our sins. The beautiful thing about it is that God has taken responsibility.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Yehoshua – Original Hebrew Name meaning Yahweh is salvation
Yeshua – Shortened Hebrew version during/after Babylonian exile
Iesous – Yeshua translated into Greek
Iesvs – Yeshua translated into Latin
Iesus – Original King James English Edition
Jesus – Modern English Versions
Yeshua was a common alternative form of the name Yehoshuah or in the English Joshua. In Greek the spelling is Iesous. In Latin the spelling is Iesus. In English the spelling is Jesus. The name "Jesus" is fully accurate for any English translation of the Greek name.
http://gotquestions.org/Jesus-Hail-Zeus.html
Yeshua – Shortened Hebrew version during/after Babylonian exile
Iesous – Yeshua translated into Greek
Iesvs – Yeshua translated into Latin
Iesus – Original King James English Edition
Jesus – Modern English Versions
Yeshua was a common alternative form of the name Yehoshuah or in the English Joshua. In Greek the spelling is Iesous. In Latin the spelling is Iesus. In English the spelling is Jesus. The name "Jesus" is fully accurate for any English translation of the Greek name.
http://gotquestions.org/Jesus-Hail-Zeus.html
-
1
- Show all
I found this on wiki:
The English name "Joshua" is a rendering of the Yehoshua, interpreted in Christian theology
as "is salvation". This requires a different vocalization of the second name component,
reading it as related to Hoshea—the name used in the Torah before Moses added the
divine name. The modern linguistic analysis of the name, however, is "Yahweh is lordly".
"Jesus " is the English derivative of the Greek transliteration of "Yehoshua" via Latin.
In the Septuagint, all instances of the word "Yehoshua" are rendered as "Ἰησοῦς" (Iēsoūs),
the closest Greek pronunciation of the Aramaic: ישוע Yeshua. Thus, in modern Greek,
Joshua is called "Jesus son of Naue" (τοῦ Ναυή) to differentiate him from Jesus . This is
also true in some Slavic languages following the Eastern Orthodox tradition (e.g.
"Иисус Навин", Iisús Navín, in Bulgarian, Serbian and Russian, but not Czech).
The English name "Joshua" is a rendering of the Yehoshua, interpreted in Christian theology
as "is salvation". This requires a different vocalization of the second name component,
reading it as related to Hoshea—the name used in the Torah before Moses added the
divine name. The modern linguistic analysis of the name, however, is "Yahweh is lordly".
"Jesus " is the English derivative of the Greek transliteration of "Yehoshua" via Latin.
In the Septuagint, all instances of the word "Yehoshua" are rendered as "Ἰησοῦς" (Iēsoūs),
the closest Greek pronunciation of the Aramaic: ישוע Yeshua. Thus, in modern Greek,
Joshua is called "Jesus son of Naue" (τοῦ Ναυή) to differentiate him from Jesus . This is
also true in some Slavic languages following the Eastern Orthodox tradition (e.g.
"Иисус Навин", Iisús Navín, in Bulgarian, Serbian and Russian, but not Czech).
-
1
- Show all
KJ, AKJ, Darby, Webster's, Smith's Literal, Douay-Rheims, and Catholic Public Domain
Bibles all use the word "Jesus" in that verse
Heh, some of those translation
names I had never even heard before, but they came up for me on Biblehub.com
when I asked to see more translations for that verse You are welcome
Bibles all use the word "Jesus" in that verse
Heh, some of those translation names I had never even heard before, but they came up for me on Biblehub.com
when I asked to see more translations for that verse
You are welcome -
1
- Show all
This is the way net fishing happens....
This is one of the oldest methods that fishing is done.
There aren't as many plants in the Sea of Galilee as the video shows....but Peter was extremely practiced at casting his net....and it requires a LOT of practice to cast it correctly. (And pull it up)
You end up with a lot of trash in your net fishing this way. So it was when Peter is cleaning his net (to preserve it) that Jesus is coming along and preaching.
-
1
- Show all
