PaulThomson said: That's because your assertions went right over the bible and did not comport with reasonable rules of comprehension and logic applied to the bible.
I showed that your reading comprehension and logic were poor in a previous post to PennEd..
PaulThomson said:
Paul does not say "He chose each of us (ekaston hEmOn) in Christ before the foundation of the world." He says "He chose us (hEmas), i.e. the community of the church, in Christ before the foundation of the world; not specific individuals before the foundation of the world, who ended up added to the church.
If Paul were referring to each individual, he could have used the Greek word ekastos to say each. He didn't. So don't read ekastos into the text when it is not there.
When someone reports that a rioting mob marched down Main Street and they burned down 25 businesses, do they mean that each one burned down 25 shops? According to you the answer is yes, because obviously they is made up of individuals.
When someone reports the theft of a recovered truck full of cheeses, that they (the cheeses) were stolen in the recovered delivery truck from Main Street before 2 am on Thursday for distribution to cafes in the neighbouring county the next day, does that mean that each cheese was individually selected by brand name and packet weight at the time the truck was stolen? According to you the theives knew each cheese by name because a truckload of cheese (they) is obviously made up of individual cheeses.
Your problem is that you are applying a severe lack of reading comprehension and a poor understanding of logic to wrested biblical texts in order to prop up a systematic theology you were taught which was never based on competent reading comprehension and logic in the first place.
You are also confusing "adoption as sons" which Paul says specifically is the resurrection of the saints which will happen at the end of the age; vs. being born into God's family as new babes in Christ happening 2000 years before the adoption as sons.
"5 "... having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will..."
The us is the saints Paul is addressing who are already children of God, but are predestined for adoption as sons at the resurrection. Again you are suffering from poor reading comprehension and a poor understanding of logic.
I showed that your reading comprehension and logic were poor in a previous post to PennEd..
PaulThomson said:
Paul does not say "He chose each of us (ekaston hEmOn) in Christ before the foundation of the world." He says "He chose us (hEmas), i.e. the community of the church, in Christ before the foundation of the world; not specific individuals before the foundation of the world, who ended up added to the church.
If Paul were referring to each individual, he could have used the Greek word ekastos to say each. He didn't. So don't read ekastos into the text when it is not there.
When someone reports that a rioting mob marched down Main Street and they burned down 25 businesses, do they mean that each one burned down 25 shops? According to you the answer is yes, because obviously they is made up of individuals.
When someone reports the theft of a recovered truck full of cheeses, that they (the cheeses) were stolen in the recovered delivery truck from Main Street before 2 am on Thursday for distribution to cafes in the neighbouring county the next day, does that mean that each cheese was individually selected by brand name and packet weight at the time the truck was stolen? According to you the theives knew each cheese by name because a truckload of cheese (they) is obviously made up of individual cheeses.
Your problem is that you are applying a severe lack of reading comprehension and a poor understanding of logic to wrested biblical texts in order to prop up a systematic theology you were taught which was never based on competent reading comprehension and logic in the first place.
You are also confusing "adoption as sons" which Paul says specifically is the resurrection of the saints which will happen at the end of the age; vs. being born into God's family as new babes in Christ happening 2000 years before the adoption as sons.
"5 "... having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will..."
The us is the saints Paul is addressing who are already children of God, but are predestined for adoption as sons at the resurrection. Again you are suffering from poor reading comprehension and a poor understanding of logic.
PaulThomson said: That's because your assertions went right over the bible and did not comport with reasonable rules of comprehension and logic applied to the bible.
I showed that your reading comprehension and logic were poor in a previous post to PennEd..
PaulThomson said:
Paul does not say "He chose each of us (ekaston hEmOn) in Christ before the foundation of the world." He says "He chose us (hEmas), i.e. the community of the church, in Christ before the foundation of the world; not specific individuals before the foundation of the world, who ended up added to the church.
If Paul were referring to each individual, he could have used the Greek word ekastos to say each. He didn't. So don't read ekastos into the text when it is not there.
When someone reports that a rioting mob marched down Main Street and they burned down 25 businesses, do they mean that each one burned down 25 shops? According to you the answer is yes, because obviously they is made up of individuals.
When someone reports the theft of a recovered truck full of cheeses, that they (the cheeses) were stolen in the recovered delivery truck from Main Street before 2 am on Thursday for distribution to cafes in the neighbouring county the next day, does that mean that each cheese was individually selected by brand name and packet weight at the time the truck was stolen? According to you the theives knew each cheese by name because a truckload of cheese (they) is obviously made up of individual cheeses.
Your problem is that you are applying a severe lack of reading comprehension and a poor understanding of logic to wrested biblical texts in order to prop up a systematic theology you were taught which was never based on competent reading comprehension and logic in the first place.
You are also confusing "adoption as sons" which Paul says specifically is the resurrection of the saints which will happen at the end of the age; vs. being born into God's family as new babes in Christ happening 2000 years before the adoption as sons.
"5 "... having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will..."
The us is the saints Paul is addressing who are already children of God, but are predestined for adoption as sons at the resurrection. Again you are suffering from poor reading comprehension and a poor understanding of logic.
I showed that your reading comprehension and logic were poor in a previous post to PennEd..
PaulThomson said:
Paul does not say "He chose each of us (ekaston hEmOn) in Christ before the foundation of the world." He says "He chose us (hEmas), i.e. the community of the church, in Christ before the foundation of the world; not specific individuals before the foundation of the world, who ended up added to the church.
If Paul were referring to each individual, he could have used the Greek word ekastos to say each. He didn't. So don't read ekastos into the text when it is not there.
When someone reports that a rioting mob marched down Main Street and they burned down 25 businesses, do they mean that each one burned down 25 shops? According to you the answer is yes, because obviously they is made up of individuals.
When someone reports the theft of a recovered truck full of cheeses, that they (the cheeses) were stolen in the recovered delivery truck from Main Street before 2 am on Thursday for distribution to cafes in the neighbouring county the next day, does that mean that each cheese was individually selected by brand name and packet weight at the time the truck was stolen? According to you the theives knew each cheese by name because a truckload of cheese (they) is obviously made up of individual cheeses.
Your problem is that you are applying a severe lack of reading comprehension and a poor understanding of logic to wrested biblical texts in order to prop up a systematic theology you were taught which was never based on competent reading comprehension and logic in the first place.
You are also confusing "adoption as sons" which Paul says specifically is the resurrection of the saints which will happen at the end of the age; vs. being born into God's family as new babes in Christ happening 2000 years before the adoption as sons.
"5 "... having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will..."
The us is the saints Paul is addressing who are already children of God, but are predestined for adoption as sons at the resurrection. Again you are suffering from poor reading comprehension and a poor understanding of logic.