I was thinking about the problem being expressed here.
If we are talking ideas and how people express them or other handle them, it is difficult
to talk about "false witness".
This is because other than quoting the exact words used some could claim they are not
being handled correctly. So I tend to talk about the idea and not the person who expressed
it or even how they expressed it. It is the idea that matters not the person who expressed it.
Some call this lying, yet this is the basis of discussion and debate. Ideas and concepts is what
bdf is about. At the end one hopes agreement can be reached and opinions formed.
God was talking about false witness in terms of I saw x doing y when x did not do y.
It is about concrete events in time and which are not a matter of argument but fact.
Now if one wants to create condemnation and judgementalism and guilt in others one
can mix the two. I do not recommend this as it is very confusing in the world of ideas,
and is actually pointless.