Nature of man --- a different biblical perspective worth considering ( part 1)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jul 11, 2020
539
97
28
[QUOTE="posthuman, posted

i'm reminded of this --

Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who had not sinned according to the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.
(Romans 5:14)
so there's an obvious question; what does it mean, to sin 'in the way of Adam' ?

which reminds me that Adam was not deceived ((1 Timothy 2:14)). so in the garden there was the transgression of Woman, being deceived, and Adam, not being deceived. two different 'likenesses' -- and it was through Adam sin entered the world ((Romans 5:12)) not through Woman. what's going on in Romans 5:14? there are those who sin in the way of Adam's transgression, not deceived, and those who do not sin in the way of Adam -- as Woman, deceived?

John tells us that if we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves -- so the one who says he has no sin, that's not 'after the transgression of Adam' because that's deceived, unlike Adam: and death reigned over them as well [/QUOTE]


From the scripture, we come to know
1. the original sin-- which Adam committed that brought death to the world , from Adam to Moses (Romans 5:14)
2. actual sin --- which makes us individually or personally accountable for our deeds. (Ezekiel 18:20; The soul that sins shall die. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.)
3. the original sin notwithstanding, there were people that did not die. We can say they rose above the original sin e.g Enoch/Elijah.
4/ there were also people that were noted to be righteous despite the original sin. to be righteous is different from being perfect
5. There are people who did not sin in the way of Adam and still died e.g Children who died before reaching the age of reason.

The sin of Adam/Eve is the sin of unbelief/disobedience./lack of trust in God/ignorance. The same manner of sin is witnessed in the heart of man from Adam even upto our time. Man continues to nurture the sin consciousness and continues to die as a result.

I do not know what you mean by two likenesses. In literal interpretation, we can say Adam was not directly deceived but was equally responsible because he also ate the forbidden fruit. He was the person in charge and failed in his duty. For me I do not fancy the literal sense much for there is a deeper interpretation which brings out the interplay of the male and female qualities of God in us "named" Adam and Eve, which will be too long to explain in this post. Why do you think Eve was tempted instead of Adam? Why was Adam silent while he was with Eve during the time of temptation?

In brief , when I said I am God's image and likeness and not dust, I recognise that I have the nature of God and God is my substance or essence for in him we live and move and have our being. (Acts 17 : 28). There are no two likenesses.

Yes John says so which is correct. Paul equally tells us that under the law, all have sinned and come short of the glory of God. What else do the scripture say?, "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world but that the world through him might be saved. (John 3:16 -17). Lets digress a bit

Paul says that for until the law, sin was in the world but sin is not imputed where there is no law ( Romans 5 :13. }
There are two notable laws God gave from Genesis to Moses.
1. the one he gave to Adam in the garden of Eden which Adam failed to obey. His sin was imputed to mankind and man died as a result. Though people continued to sin after the fall, nobody"s sin was further imputed to anyone. Everybody bore the responsibility of their own actual sins.

2. The law given to Moses at mount Sinai. Under this law, Paul recorded that all sinned and come short of the glory of God. But God, this time, for the love of his children, for he does not take pleasure in the death of anyone (Ezekiel 18:32), manifested himself in the flesh (Timothy 3:15) in the person of Christ Jesus who carried our sins and nailed them on the cross. (Imputing our sins unto himself)

Paul noted, as we died and were buried with him, our old man was crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed that henceforth we should not serve sin. For he that is dead is freed from sin. For in that he died he died unto sin once but in that he lives, he lives unto God, Likewise reckon you also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body that you should obey it in the lusts thereof.(Romans 6)
Neither yield your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin but yield yourselves unto God as those that are alive from the dead and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God. For sin shall not have dominion over you, for you are not under the law but under grace.
Studying the whole of Paul's letter to the Romans will help us appreciate this fact more.

Christ Jesus took our sins away and imputes his righteousness unto us as he rose from the death.(Romans 5). We can now live without sin for sin has no more dominion over us as it had when we were under the law. As I said before, in the same way we have nurtured the seed of Adam in the past, following Adam's footsteps as regards sin, we are required to nurture and grow this seed of righteousness that yields the fruits of godliness unto holiness and eternal life. We must likewise follow the footsteps of Jesus to remain righteous and holy. (1 John 2:6). But what happens, we continue to sin as if we are still under the law and therefore we continue to die.

Christ Jesus has made it possible for us to live above sin in this world. But we have refused to do so, therefore, his second coming is eminent for the reaping. Tell me, what else do we want God our father to do for us.? What manner of love has he not shown towards us? Today we still perish for lack of knowledge despite the understanding our Lord Jesus Christ have declared unto us. From Genesis till date, we see his light and love being showered on mankind to the extent of allowing his only begotten Son to die for us. That notwithstanding, we continue to sin and he continues to forebear and suffer long with us. Habaa!!.

Since we have continued to sin as St John noted, It is important to repent of our sins with a true heart and embrace Christ Jesus for God searches the heart, not appearances and continue to walk in the understanding and truth he gave us as well as in his footsteps as he has physically exemplified the way for us.
 
Jul 11, 2020
539
97
28
"Infinite_Ark, posted

"]Why would God create man to fall?[/QUOTE]


Did God create man to fall? Not my belief.
 
Jul 11, 2020
539
97
28
[QUOTE="posthuman, posted

why do you delete part of the quotation code[/QUOTE]

I did not. Lenna did. Maybe she should answer the question why she deleted that.
 
Jul 11, 2020
539
97
28
[QUOTE="Mii, posted

]Yeah np, I haven't read part 2 yet and I may have even overspoke. Every believer that is a bit "mystical" needs to be mindful of lying spirits. There are so called deep things of Satan and since what you are scratching at is mirrored in a lot of religions without Christ as a cornerstone it's just something to be careful about. Wondering why no one is where you are in your walk or having the understanding that you do.

It doesn't mean that the Lord isn't showing you and you are a forerunner. I do not know. It is unclear I'm just putting this forward for consideration :)

I don't recall if I said I was going to read part 2 or no, but I may yet.[/QUOTE]

First, I am not claiming to be a forerunner of anything. I only explain the way I understand the scripture. Moving from the principles of the doctrine of Christ Jesus unto perfection as Paul enjoins us to do in Hebrews 5 and 6, requires us having deeper spiritual understanding of the scripture as regards our relationship with our Father, God. I do not believe that what I am saying is mirrored in religions that do not have Christ as a cornerstone because Christ remains the cornerstone of what I am saying. And that is why the deep things of Satan have no part in what I am saying.

God meets us at our individual point of need. This I believe. I know there are people that subscribe to my point of view. It is not the general consensus and truth is that it does not have to be.
 
Jul 11, 2020
539
97
28
[QUOTE="Mii, posted

]OH KAY. I have finally read "most" of part 2 (I scanned a little bit).

See here's the thing. I resonate with 90% of what you are saying in this post. It's the 10% that has drawn my attention that "perhaps" it may not be best to speak publicly on the 10% I am uncertain about.

Of course, at the same time, I have this sort of "rule" that I won't talk about the things that I am not sure about until someone brings it up (if ever). Still this rule is "my rule" and I don't know if it's the Lord's directive or not.

That being the case, I will couch what I say similarly to my last post. On the male and female attributes being within the Lord and both within us but separate in a unique equation that brings Glory to himself by our union (holy matrimony)...I used an eastern religious symbol to explain what you related in a private conversation. I am uncertain if it is true or not, but it seemed to make sense. Then again, we aren't told. Each of us probably has to draw our own conclusions on that. What we do know from scripture is that it is a mysterious thing (from Paul I think) and while we are allowed to search out deep mysteries, the nature of a mystery means that even if I feel like I have "solved" it...I may have merely pierced it.

Caught a glimpse of the fullness of the mystery if you will. Besides, if someone else sees the same thing, their journey to solving it will be by default, somewhat different from my own, in that we are all unique.

While I do think there is standardization within the body (agreement) the standard may sometimes have to be confirmed by the Lord since there is so much diversity in Christ. Ex: a native islander vs an English Lord who both know the Lord but are in different worlds. Still we should be able to resonate with each other and if we can't resonate in the Lord (excepting ourselves)...then perhaps we are not from the same kingdom and further considerations on continued involvement should be seriously considered.

In any case, not sure why I'm saying all this. I'd like to teach what you are suggesting because that type of knowledge does flow and seems pretty neat but because I see eastern religions teaching a similar thing without Christ, it is confusing to entertain further when I guess the Lord shows me that this goes on. It brings up more questions but I just table it. Like it is a strong message against sexism and even subjugation of women by some Christian males. Not sure, all I know is that I believe that because Eve was taken out of man. A piece of man necessarily is within her and even a rib being a compatible tool suggests that man likewise is an open conduit to his counterpart. It's a cool thing to discuss in what to me is poetry/allegory but unless I am reading your posts too liberally (into licentiousness) then it seems reasonable what you posted...just worded in a different way.

Like the last post, I just caution you to be cautious. There once was a time where I looked in strange places for truth due to a saying I heard in university ("all truth is God's truth") that may be true, but willing looking at lies to discern the truth within a lie not by necessity but almost as a pursuit is unwise to me at this stage of maturity. Used to not be because I think what I need to understand will find me. I don't need to go looking. I'm not saying you do, but it's just a warning.

It's cool to see someone perceive it in a similar way that I "wish" was true. It may be. I don't know right now. Could be that some of it will make more sense after I wed but Idk.[/QUOTE]



Wow! 90%. that's not bad at all. I can understand the rest and I respect your opinion.

I am intrigued by your post and it seems to me that you even have more understanding of what I am trying to put across.
If the Eastern Religions do not preach Christ, then, I am 100% sure that my belief is different from theirs. I actually concentrate more on my bible than any other book or teachings. I will make out time to read about them in the Net and know what they teach. I Know I have reached a stage in my life where my convictions cannot be swarved by every wave of doctrine.

Thank you for your warning. I take it. I believe the Holy Spirit will guide us all into all truth if we open our hearts in sincerity towards God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord and saviour.

Remain blessed.
 
Jul 11, 2020
539
97
28
[QUOTE="infinitekhanol, posted

]I am signing off. ' will comment on this post and the rest when next I sign in. Thanks for chatting.[/QUOTE]

@posthuman

I am so sorry for responding to your post late. Not on CC most times in view of other things taking up my time. 'hope you understand.
 
Jul 11, 2020
539
97
28
[QUOTE="posthuman, posted

um,

Genesis 1:27-28 --- God made man, male & female, and blessed them
Genesis 1:31 --- God looked at all He had created and indeed it was very good


is sin "very good" ? [/QUOTE]

oh. okay. I have not responded to this. There seems to be misunderstanding of what I wrote, maybe, because of the way i framed it.

God saw everything he made that it was very good. No question about that for God did not create sin. What I meant is that sin came in after God has finished creation including the separation of female element from Adam and making them living souls as man and woman.
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
[QUOTE="lenna, posted

the op is enamored with a book entitled Solving the Matrix of Being by someone named Eucharia Nonyelum Unegbu, a Nigerian individual

It is on this particular book, we are being instructed by the op and from which he concludes we can be sinless, as well as other particular things that are not actually Christian doctrine

he believes he was born a Christian among other irregular ideas, so don't be surprised if you do not understand what this is about

his twitter feed is the source for this information and no I am not a hacker

Some people make assumptions based on falsehood and believe the falsehood to be true. It is unfortunate.[/QUOTE]
Why did you copy and paste your op with out revealing the source?????
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
"Magenta, posted

Are you saying Adam was incapable of sinning? Sin entered the world through one man: Adam.
The Adam that was wholly Spirit - driven is incapable of sinning. If you notice in the garden of Eden, before Eve was made, Adam had a perfect relationship with God. Sin entered when Eve, the woman was introduced. The second part of my op shows why this is so.[/QUOTE]
You made that up.
If you don't get real,nobody is going to respect your view.

The only way "adam could not sin" is for God to make him a robot.

His choice was established /ability to choose ,when God commanded him not to eat of the tree.
To eat/not eat.
The devil has always helped men to sin.

All you are seeing in Adam sinning is his ability to sin.
That is all.
Unless you also can see that FROM THE START man has an obsession with the forbidden.

NOT..."adam could not sin"

Just watch......somehow that dynamic is some foundation for yet another false doctrine
 
Jul 23, 2018
12,199
2,775
113
[QUOTE="posthuman, posted

more questions:

is a view that the body is irrelevant compatible with these things God does regarding the body?
is the view that the flesh is inherently evil & should not be considered as part of man, compatible with the resurrection?

I saw where you quoted Gnosticism in one of my posts. You seem to be applying your understanding of their belief system to my op. if what they believe is what you have noted here, then, my belief is different and theirs is not compatible with what I have written in my op.[/QUOTE]
A statement of faith would clear that up as well as being honest about your teachers affiliation.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,815
29,194
113
[QUOTE="posthuman, posted

um,

Genesis 1:27-28 --- God made man, male & female, and blessed them
Genesis 1:31 --- God looked at all He had created and indeed it was very good


is sin "very good" ?
oh. okay. I have not responded to this. There seems to be misunderstanding of what I wrote, maybe, because of the way i framed it.

God saw everything he made that it was very good. No question about that for God did not create sin. What I meant is that sin came in after God has finished creation including the separation of female element from Adam and making them living souls as man and woman.
Please stop destroying the quote function/format :oops:

Place your cursor after the [ /quote] before you start typing ;)
 
Jul 11, 2020
539
97
28
[QUOTE="Magenta, posted

Scripture specifically says sin entered through Adam.

How do you figure Adam, before Eve was made, was wholly spirit?

He was fashioned out of the dust of the ground.[/QUOTE]

Oh, it seems I have not responded to your post. sorry about that.

What did Paul say in 1 Timothy 2:14 -- Adam was not deceived but the woman being deceived was in transgression. We know Adam ate the forbidden fruit too and therefore fell to the temptation. Satan worked through Eve to get to Adam if I may simplify it that way.

Adam was in charge. The responsibility to keep things according to the word of God was giving to him. so, if something went wrong, he was to blame.

To be frank i do not like to interpret the story of creation by the letter. My understanding of what we are saying here is way different but it will be another long post for me to explain it, so, i leave it at that for now. Suffice it to say that I see the story of creation as narrated in Genesis chapter 1 and 2 as a continuous story that is complete in itself and not separate from each other. When we see it as one complete story, we will have a better understanding of it, in my own opinion.

The man that was made in the image of God, which he made male and female and called Adam is wholly Spirit driven. We, ourselves can reach that level of spirituality where our actions are wholly determined by the Holy Spirit. In this state, there is neither male nor female, neither Greek nor Jew, neither Bond nor free, neither Americans nor Africans nor caucasians etc. The bible says so in clear terms. In Christ Jesus, our physical differences play no role.

He was fashioned out of dust. Yes, that is what the letter of the word says. What does the spirit in the word say. Paul tells us the letter kills but the spirit gives life. Not everything in the scripture can be interpreted by the letter. Is there another way we can look at it that agrees more with the scripture. For me, the answer is yes.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,815
29,194
113
What did Paul say in 1 Timothy 2:14 -- Adam was not deceived but the woman being deceived was in transgression. We know Adam ate the forbidden fruit too and therefore fell to the temptation. Satan worked through Eve to get to Adam if I may simplify it that way.
Adam, not being deceived, sinned willfully and knowingly.

This man, Adam, is Spirit - driven and incapable of sinning as he does not have the capacity, tendency or ability to sin.
Therefore, this statement from your OP is in error.

We are perfected through the only perfect human being, the last Adam, not the first.

His Name is Jesus Christ :)
 
Jul 11, 2020
539
97
28
Adam, not being deceived, sinned willfully and knowingly.

Therefore, this statement from your OP is in error.

We are perfected through the only perfect human being, the last Adam, not the first.

His Name is Jesus Christ :)
It seems you are jumping the gun. My discussion was on the man God created in Genesis chapter 1 and 2. At that time, Christ Jesus was not yet come in the flesh. I have not discussed the fall of man and God's plan of salvation for mankind. So I think what I discussed and what you are saying are two different things?
 
Jul 11, 2020
539
97
28
I saw where you quoted Gnosticism in one of my posts. You seem to be applying your understanding of their belief system to my op. if what they believe is what you have noted here, then, my belief is different and theirs is not compatible with what I have written in my op.
A statement of faith would clear that up as well as being honest about your teachers affiliation.[/QUOTE] My teachers affiliation? Oh wow! No comment on that.
 
Jul 11, 2020
539
97
28
Some people make assumptions based on falsehood and believe the falsehood to be true. It is unfortunate.
Why did you copy and paste your op with out revealing the source?????[/QUOTE] Thank you for making me laugh. I have been too serious trying to respond to the various posts here.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,726
13,522
113
@posthuman

I am so sorry for responding to your post late. Not on CC most times in view of other things taking up my time. 'hope you understand.
it's OK i have had a busy few months too. the nice thing about a forum vs. a chatroom is that the conversations are still here, waiting to be picked up again. :)


oh. okay. I have not responded to this. There seems to be misunderstanding of what I wrote, maybe, because of the way i framed it.

God saw everything he made that it was very good. No question about that for God did not create sin. What I meant is that sin came in after God has finished creation including the separation of female element from Adam and making them living souls as man and woman.
was Woman created on the sixth day?

((in re: Genesis 1:24-31)) --
  • vv.24-25, made the earth bring forth living souls, every beast & creeping thing after its kind
  • v.27, made man, after His image, male & female He created them
  • v.31, saw every thing that He had made, and behold! it was very good
  • v.31, there was evening and morning, the sixth day