S
HOW TO SPOT A FALSE TEACHER
My theological and church education taught me to identify false teachers by their doctrine. One New Testament passage that clearly teaches this is found in 1 John.
However, this passage may also be read to imply that any teacher with orthodox Christology is a true prophet. That is to say, true doctrine is the definitive mark of a true teacher. When evaluating the ministries and teaching of pastors, then, doctrine should be primary. Other issues––methodology, personality, even motivation––are secondary. Indeed, we seem to see this way of thinking authorized by the Apostle Paul in Phil 1:15–18.
Is this doctrine-first principle biblical? In a sense, yes. I mean, I quoted bible verses above, right? However, I would argue that this principle in isolation is not representative of the New Testament picture of false teaching and false teachers. Even more importantly, when this emphasis on doctrinal faithfulness is separated from the rest of the New Testament’s teaching, it becomes dangerous.
so we see that false teachers/prophets are recognized in both testaments and we are warned against them
to deny this truth then, is to expose a heart that defines its own truth
we should always agree with scripture
My theological and church education taught me to identify false teachers by their doctrine. One New Testament passage that clearly teaches this is found in 1 John.
Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. (1 John 4:1–3)
We may rightly conclude from this passage that an appropriate marker of true gospel teaching is an orthodox confession of the Son’s incarnation. We can also generalize this principle. Other central and historic Christian teachings serve as markers for the authenticity of gospel proclamation. So, teachers who explicitly deny such core tenets as the doctrine of creation, the divinity of Jesus, the Trinity, or the bodily resurrection should be labelled as teaching a false gospel.However, this passage may also be read to imply that any teacher with orthodox Christology is a true prophet. That is to say, true doctrine is the definitive mark of a true teacher. When evaluating the ministries and teaching of pastors, then, doctrine should be primary. Other issues––methodology, personality, even motivation––are secondary. Indeed, we seem to see this way of thinking authorized by the Apostle Paul in Phil 1:15–18.
Is this doctrine-first principle biblical? In a sense, yes. I mean, I quoted bible verses above, right? However, I would argue that this principle in isolation is not representative of the New Testament picture of false teaching and false teachers. Even more importantly, when this emphasis on doctrinal faithfulness is separated from the rest of the New Testament’s teaching, it becomes dangerous.
so we see that false teachers/prophets are recognized in both testaments and we are warned against them
to deny this truth then, is to expose a heart that defines its own truth
we should always agree with scripture
- 1
- Show all