KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLES
- Thread starter KingJamesVersionBibleOnly
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Pascha from Strong’s...
- the paschal sacrifice (which was accustomed to be offered for the people's deliverance of old from Egypt)
- the paschal lamb, i.e. the lamb the Israelites were accustomed to slay and eat on the fourteenth day of the month of Nisan (the first month of their year) in memory of the day on which their fathers, preparing to depart from Egypt, were bidden by God to slay and eat a lamb, and to sprinkle their door posts with its blood, that the destroying angel, seeing the blood, might pass over their dwellings; Christ crucified is likened to the slain paschal lamb
- the paschal supper
- the paschal feast, the feast of the Passover, extending from the 14th to the 20th day of the month Nisan
If I remember rightly resurrection is associated with the Feast of Tabernacles not Passover as a type/anti-type.
So resurrection does not complete Passover and turn it into easter.
That won't explain away the KJV translators blunder and inconsistency any more than trying to claim there is a difference between holy ghost and holy spirit.
So resurrection does not complete Passover and turn it into easter.
That won't explain away the KJV translators blunder and inconsistency any more than trying to claim there is a difference between holy ghost and holy spirit.
Remember, he's talking about things I haven't learned yet. What are these things he's talking about?
There's two Christs in every believer. A heresy.
The Christ inside of him is not the same Christ indwelling another believer that learned about the Christ another way. Another heresy.
He doesn't care about the originals because the KJV corrected and improved them. A joke.
Yep, I haven't learned what he's talking about, and I praise God every day for it.
There's two Christs in every believer. A heresy.
The Christ inside of him is not the same Christ indwelling another believer that learned about the Christ another way. Another heresy.
He doesn't care about the originals because the KJV corrected and improved them. A joke.
Yep, I haven't learned what he's talking about, and I praise God every day for it.
It's a snowball effect for them.
If they admit that Easter isn't the correct word used in Acts 12:4, they have to...
1) Admit the translators of the KJV weren't inspired as they translated it
2) There are errors in the KJV just like the other versions
3) Brings the KJV down off the throne as their god and makes it just like the other versions
4) The mss the KJV translators used were no better than the mss used by MV's
So I know why they won't admit it. They will never quit worshipping their god, the KJV.
If they admit that Easter isn't the correct word used in Acts 12:4, they have to...
1) Admit the translators of the KJV weren't inspired as they translated it
2) There are errors in the KJV just like the other versions
3) Brings the KJV down off the throne as their god and makes it just like the other versions
4) The mss the KJV translators used were no better than the mss used by MV's
So I know why they won't admit it. They will never quit worshipping their god, the KJV.
h...,
HERE IS YOUR SPIN;
Originally Posted by hornetguy
I have no problem calling a "bible" that espouses those things as a re-write, because it is changing basic doctrine to fit politically correct thought.
What I have a problem with is anyone insinuating that anything other than the KJV translation is a "re-write". They are translations... just as the KJV is...."
I didn't say that....nor was it insinuated by any word choice I made.
What I have a problem with is those who spin and add to a post as if it were gospel by the writer...fakely.
You apology is not necessary. Perhaps a correction to be considered.
HERE IS YOUR SPIN;
I have no problem calling a "bible" that espouses those things as a re-write, because it is changing basic doctrine to fit politically correct thought.
What I have a problem with is anyone insinuating that anything other than the KJV translation is a "re-write". They are translations... just as the KJV is...."
I didn't say that....nor was it insinuated by any word choice I made.
What I have a problem with is those who spin and add to a post as if it were gospel by the writer...fakely.
You apology is not necessary. Perhaps a correction to be considered.
Last edited:
