I really can appreciate and understand that answer MF, and until recently would have given the same answer.
I however don't now think it's a simple matter of this woman being requested to ' go call her husband' is just for test purposes.
If we believe that Jesus knows all and everything, then wouldn't he already know the woman's marital status from the beginning, and already know that she would give him a truthful answer?
I however don't now think it's a simple matter of this woman being requested to ' go call her husband' is just for test purposes.
If we believe that Jesus knows all and everything, then wouldn't he already know the woman's marital status from the beginning, and already know that she would give him a truthful answer?
I think He was just steering the conversation.
Kind of like a parent asking a child, "What did you just do?" The parent already knows, but wants the child to consider what he just did.
Kind of like a parent asking a child, "What did you just do?" The parent already knows, but wants the child to consider what he just did.
Hi Gideon; Can you explain or speculate the purpose of going through such motions when Jesus would already know the answers to, and all outcomes ?
I don't think it was a test of her honesty, nor to teach her and particular life lesson. If I were to explain my view in the modern vernacular, I think that Jesus wanted to let the woman know that "I feel ya..."
Placing myself in the perspective of the woman who afterwards realized that she "must be" in the presence of a prophet after He directed her to go and get her husband.
If her relationship coincided in any way with that He is a Jew and she is a Samaritan, and one who later would go into town telling everyone, not just Samaritan (who she earlier reasoned would have nothing to do with her let alone listen to her) then, she entertained that thought of going and getting her husband and what would come of it.
This notion I believe is offered a "third witness" in the context Jesus' declaration of those that worship in spirit and in truth as, if her "husband" were not any sort of husband in spirit then he would be in truth. And this is the reason said, "you are not wrong in saying, 'I have no husband.'"