I sigh with shrugs, when I read someone say that Jesus died for some but not for others,
Why belittle or limit His atoning sacrifice. He died for us all.
We choose to reject or accept.
Taking away choice, takes away His Glory because no one is given options.
If you feel there is no choice, why do you bother with trying to prove that to be so? Is that not a colossal waste of time?
How does that serve you or anyone else?
It is the height of egoism and pride. A doctrine is promoted here that says exactly that; Jesus didn't die for the whole world, but for those God pre-s
elected.
And that death didn't actually accomplish anything at all , which makes Jesus entire ministry a lie, because
God does all the work having created a people incapable of choice. God Himself forces His pre-s
elects to enter His grace, gain faith in Him, against their will, the will of the totally depraved that He first created to be that. And then decided to change their totally depraved condition and save those few by His own will, not their own, because He had preplanned the entire thing and prior to creating anything, including the humans for whom He made such plans.
If we break down the particulars of TULIP we see it prescribes for the world not a God of mercy , but rather a Devil that articulates the antithesis of the Gospel message and the moral laws of Jesus, the ten commandments , and this is key in that, particularly the factor of love. Love of God and our capacity for love for our fellow human beings.
TULIP is at its core not only blasphemy, but if you picture the deity it describes, is also Satanic, propping up Satan rather than God.
John Calvin was evil. If his theology was of God why would he have any part in the execution of anyone under the charge of heresy?
Think about it.
TULIP, Calvin's doctrine, is the absolute plan of God in John Calvin's mind. He of course is one of God's elect, those who follow his doctrine are too. All who do not are not. What's the problem then with anyone else believing anything else when those beliefs are not the "true one" Calvin teaches?
Instead, John Calvin was party to a man's being burned alive, using greenwood, so that the victim would take longer to succumb because the green wood takes longer to catch to full fire, and because the man did not agree with Calvin's doctrine.
But that's to be expected isn't it? Being that man and all non-Calvinists are to remain Totally Depraved and destined to die in our sins because we are not the elect.
Isn't that enough? Shouldn't that be enough? That according to John Calvin, we're doomed to eternal damnation? Why trouble himself with wanting to see people killed by some court order? When he, Calvin, "knows" their destiny is Hell?
John Calvin was a prophet of Satan, not God.
As we're told, even Satan can appear as an angel of light.