Is the double slit experiment proof of original sin?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 21, 2021
2,852
318
83
#62
You don't understand what retrocausality is. I'm saying history was put in place instead of physical actions.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,726
13,522
113
#63
Do you think God is bound to Time? Granting souls to Homo Sapiens didn't have to be on the day they appeared in this physical fallen reality.
God isn't bound by time. But God created time and specifically told us "when" man became a living soul.

He put us in time when He created because He wanted us in time.
 
Jan 21, 2021
2,852
318
83
#64
None of you are getting what I've done here. We can shutdown anyone that brings up evolution from now on. This is ammo to wake the sleeping.
 
B

Blackpowderduelist

Guest
#65
Y'all still responding to this twattle?
Dude spouts utter heresy and don't get banned...or warned just allowed to continue, even after being corrected many times.
 
Oct 19, 2020
723
161
43
#66
You don't understand what retrocausality is. I'm saying history was put in place instead of physical actions.
I do understand what retrocausality is, it's the definition to explain {Accidents].

You are discussing time waves and lapses.
Next, everything is energy and even though it feels like my finger tips are hammering my keyboard, in reality it's my energy force cause the reaction of the energy of the keyboard to depress.

You're not a Believer in God at all.
 
Jan 21, 2021
2,852
318
83
#67
New ideas can be scary, it's not a valid reason to vilify the guy that just handed you something capable of waking millions. But, oh right, be sure to be stuck in your ways and allow them to fry.
 
Oct 19, 2020
723
161
43
#68
New ideas can be scary, it's not a valid reason to vilify the guy that just handed you something capable of waking millions. But, oh right, be sure to be stuck in your ways and allow them to fry.


Your ideas are not new. This is old news. I proven this wrong eons ago.
 
Oct 19, 2020
723
161
43
#69
What pittsburgjoe is claiming here in plain English:


We are not experiencing life this very moment. This is a memory that happened Billions of years ago. Every day is not a new day but a replay of something that has transpired. And every once in awhile, a time wave or lapse will react and change the pattern. I've lit up some mighty creative bongs before, but i've yet to achieve the heights of this realm you're in Pitt Joe!
 
Oct 19, 2020
723
161
43
#72
Why would sin and retrocasuality have any attachments. You think miraculously a sin committed can disappear by your theory?
 
Oct 19, 2020
723
161
43
#73
Or, you think the original sin by Adam could be reversed?
 
Oct 19, 2020
723
161
43
#74
And this would have to go all the way back to sin in its particle form before connecting with humanity. Why else would you be using Retrocasuality then?
 
Jan 21, 2021
2,852
318
83
#75
We are in a fallen reality started by original sin. God has control of the future and past. If you want a morality test you don't give humans direct evidence. You generate history of evolution up to Adam sinning.
 
Oct 19, 2020
723
161
43
#76
We are in a fallen reality started by original sin. God has control of the future and past. If you want a morality test you don't give humans direct evidence. You generate history of evolution up to Adam sinning.
And how does morality merge with natural selection, since natural selection is [murder]?
 
Oct 19, 2020
723
161
43
#77
Adam has to be pure in original form. How does morality get to Adam by way of Natural Selection for Adam to be pure? Natural Selection makes Adam a murderer from original state of existence. And this is before Adam sins!
 
Jan 21, 2021
2,852
318
83
#78
Adam doesn't have a soul IN THIS FALLEN REALITY HISTORY until original sin.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,813
29,193
113
#79
I do understand what retrocausality is, it's the definition to explain {Accidents].

You are discussing time waves and lapses.
Next, everything is energy and even though it feels like my finger tips are hammering my keyboard, in reality it's my energy force cause the reaction of the energy of the keyboard to depress.

You're not a Believer in God at all.
He says energy is sin... meaning God either has no energy or God has sin.

Like I said: he destroys his own arguments :oops::giggle:
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,813
29,193
113
#80
Adam doesn't have a soul IN THIS FALLEN REALITY HISTORY until original sin.
Wrong. Man became a living soul as soon as God breathed the breath of life into his
earthly elements, but you deny that too, claiming man was not physical until the fall.