.
And what of the person who is terminally ill with 6 months to live and given a choice of extending his life by 3 months if he goes thru painful processes like chemo, radiation etc. Thus making his 9 months a sort of misery versus the 6 months of a more or less peaceful decline...
Some years back I had a friend sign a 'Do not resuscitate' order towards the end of his illness - brain cancer (a miserable way to go...)
Is the above suicide..?
If faced with similar prospects and not immersing my self in the philosophical/religious debates I think i'd favor the fast way...
.
And what of the person who is terminally ill with 6 months to live and given a choice of extending his life by 3 months if he goes thru painful processes like chemo, radiation etc. Thus making his 9 months a sort of misery versus the 6 months of a more or less peaceful decline...
Some years back I had a friend sign a 'Do not resuscitate' order towards the end of his illness - brain cancer (a miserable way to go...)
Is the above suicide..?
If faced with similar prospects and not immersing my self in the philosophical/religious debates I think i'd favor the fast way...
.
The question of duration introduces the element of 'mercy' from varying perspectives... The individual might see God's mercy as the option for less duration of suffering to join him in heaven asap; and the individual may not wish to genuinely burden his loved ones any longer than necessary.
However, the family/loved ones will likely look at the situation completely differently. The loved ones will typically opt for longer time together with the aspiration of mercy via enduring efforts to reduce the individual's pain via medication and treatments; meanwhile they may very well not see to the caretaking of their loved one for additional time as a burden - rather they are likely to see it as a blessing...
- 1
- Show all