He shares Bible quotes with minimal commentary. You are not addressing his posts at all. All you are doing is attacking his person and what you think about him.
I don't know what your background is.
However, if you do not know about SDA doctrine and its history - I advise you to check it out.
It is all smoke and mirrors.
The volume of quoted Scripture means very little when the entire point of the exercise is eisegesis (in other words reading into Scripture a presupposed meaning).
Countering it with an exegetical approach also means very little to the OP since his entire rationale for posting is only prosetylisation of the unwary and not learning.
I am not going to apologise for exposing what I consider fraud especially since he will not admit to his spiritual allegiences.
I have already shared the reasons why it would not suit him to do this because then it robs him of the ability to make many of the claims that he does. After all, if he admits that half the doctrine of the SDA church comes from Ellen G. White who is regarded as a prophet and whose writings have co-authoirty with the Bible, then clearly his claims of devotion to sola scriptura immediately fly out of the window...
On another thread just today he has made bold claims about believing in salvation by grace through faith! Yet that is utter bunkum, because the SDA position, and LGF's personal position (repeated ad nauseum) is that salvation is dependent not on grace through faith, but actually on strict adherence to SDA doctrine, including, but not exclusively Sabbath-keeping. Part of the deal is also water baptism exclusively performed by SDA clergy. He will not openly admit this.
So, LGF, is grossly misrepresenting his true position. And it needs to be exposed!
SDA doctrine is apart from Biblical Christianity and no amount of whitewashing will change that...
