Einstein Was Wrong !

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
cv5

cv5

Well-known member
#161
Nov 20, 2018
23,789
8,616
113
#161
presidente said:
cv5,

You have posted a lot of videos. Maybe you can summarize some of the main points so that readers who do not have a lot of time to watch videos can become interested in your theories.

One video said the math behind the theory of black holes required dividing by zero. Another was about Einstein's theory assuming what? No mass or something along those lines. I saw part of it, but i forget.

I'd have to take certain math courses to follow some of this. I can't see how that would be a path for uber-effective evangelism for me. I think more people can follow the stuff Ravi Zecharias says.
Click to expand...
Its going to take a while to pick it up, but you will get a handle on it trust me.

This will blow your socks off......3 minutes of your time.
Question: what are "Electric Transmission lines"?
Answer: see what the originators of EM theory have to say about it!

 
posthuman

posthuman

Senior Member
#162
Jul 31, 2013
37,954
13,615
113
#162
cv5 said:
Please post your DM/EM gravity links here I will appreciate it thanks.
I will do the same.
Thanks for your valuable input.
Click to expand...
how about consider my question. i have posed many and you haven't personally addressed any.

i can post videos and links to papers and dialogues all day but that would neither be discussion nor conversation.

if you are unwilling to actually talk your thread is utterly useless to me. I'll go buy a book and completely ignore you.
 
cv5

cv5

Well-known member
#163
Nov 20, 2018
23,789
8,616
113
#163
posthuman said:
how about consider my question. i have posed many and you haven't personally addressed any.

i can post videos and links to papers and dialogues all day but that would neither be discussion nor conversation.

if you are unwilling to actually talk your thread is utterly useless to me. I'll go buy a book and completely ignore you.
Click to expand...
Well Sir, there is no "gravity" per se according the one theory. Another theory...gravity is the polarization of the ZPE field (Barry Setterfield). Your problem? You are constantly reverting back to your old dusty textbooks, and the question itself is unanswerable in the form that you pose. There is no relation necessary at all between the two domains. Mathematics would not help either, as they are antiquated in the form as commonly used, or simply nonsensical in terms of describing the phenomenon. Totally useless.
 
cv5

cv5

Well-known member
#164
Nov 20, 2018
23,789
8,616
113
#164
posthuman said:
how about consider my question. i have posed many and you haven't personally addressed any.

i can post videos and links to papers and dialogues all day but that would neither be discussion nor conversation.

if you are unwilling to actually talk your thread is utterly useless to me. I'll go buy a book and completely ignore you.
Click to expand...
If you want to "buy a book"....start with this author. And throw out the other ones. Do you want me to dictate the contents for you as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleg_D._Jefimenko#Generalized_Theory_of_Gravitation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitoelectromagnetism
 
You must log in or register to reply here.