I have shown you from Rom 1 that men reject God as they suppress the truth in unrighteousness and that it is God's desire that all men be saved and come unto the knowledge of the truth as shown in 1 Tim 2:4.
Your response to that was to indicate that the "all" in 1 Tim 2:4 refers to believers only. You provided absolutely no Scripture to corroborate your claim.
In effect you add words to 1 Tim 2:4. God could easily have stated that it is His desire that all who believe be saved and come unto the knowledge of the truth.
But God didn't add those words and it is incumbent on you to not add to Scripture as you prop up a doctrine never intended by God.
In 1 Tim 2:4, the word "all" is the Greek word pantas (plural) and it refers to all things constituting the whole … "ALL MEN". There is no further qualifying description as you claim/infer. Just "all men" with no distinction as to whether they are believers or unbelievers.
When you add words to Scripture in order to prop up a doctrine not intended by God, you change the Word of God, and end up with an erroneous interpretation of Scripture.
When we understand that God's desire is that "ALL" men be saved and come unto the knowledge of the truth (1 Tim 2:4) and then further understand that God allows mankind to reject Him as they suppress the truth in unrighteousness (Rom 1:18), we see that there is no conflict between the two verses.
The sacrifice of my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is sufficient to cover all the sins of all mankind. The fact that some men end up in the lake of fire is due to their suppressing the truth in unrighteousness and thereby rejecting God's all sufficient grace.
Your response to that was to indicate that the "all" in 1 Tim 2:4 refers to believers only. You provided absolutely no Scripture to corroborate your claim.
In effect you add words to 1 Tim 2:4. God could easily have stated that it is His desire that all who believe be saved and come unto the knowledge of the truth.
But God didn't add those words and it is incumbent on you to not add to Scripture as you prop up a doctrine never intended by God.
In 1 Tim 2:4, the word "all" is the Greek word pantas (plural) and it refers to all things constituting the whole … "ALL MEN". There is no further qualifying description as you claim/infer. Just "all men" with no distinction as to whether they are believers or unbelievers.
When you add words to Scripture in order to prop up a doctrine not intended by God, you change the Word of God, and end up with an erroneous interpretation of Scripture.
When we understand that God's desire is that "ALL" men be saved and come unto the knowledge of the truth (1 Tim 2:4) and then further understand that God allows mankind to reject Him as they suppress the truth in unrighteousness (Rom 1:18), we see that there is no conflict between the two verses.
The sacrifice of my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is sufficient to cover all the sins of all mankind. The fact that some men end up in the lake of fire is due to their suppressing the truth in unrighteousness and thereby rejecting God's all sufficient grace.
Since you refuse to allow me to explain the meaning of scripture and force me to read it the way you see it, I win at you own game because we are not allowed to interpret scripture. In that case my view Trumps your 15 times over, winners are grinners thank you